IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v307y2025ics0378377424005699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does water rights trading cause economic losses from agricultural water scarcity? Evidence from 264 Chinese cities

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Jiajia
  • Umer, Muhammad
  • Zhao, Jun
  • Li, Qiang
  • Qu, Mei

Abstract

China’s rapid economy growth has intensified the pressure on water resources, with agriculture being the largest consumer. Insufficient water in agriculture can constrain production and lead to significant economic losses. Water rights trading (WRT) is a key mechanism for reallocating water resources within and across water-scarce regions and industries. However, WRT often reallocates saved agricultural water to more economically productive sectors. A crucial consideration is whether this shift could lead to agricultural water scarcity, thus affecting agricultural production. This study examines whether WRT contributes to potential economic losses in agriculture. Using panel data from 264 Chinese cities from 2010 to 2020, we estimate the Agricultural Water Scarcity Risk (AWSR), which quantifies the economic loss caused by agricultural water scarcity, and analyze the impact of WRT on AWSR using the Spatial Difference-in-Differences method. Our findings reveal that: (1) WRT significantly alleviate the economic production loss due to agricultural water scarcity, with the results remaining robust after various tests; (2) WRT mitigates AWSR not only locally but also in neighboring cities; and (3) the policy’s effectiveness varies by region, being most effective in the Eastern region, followed by the Central region, and least in the Western region. This study highlights the importance of rational water resource management in agriculture and provides a foundation for developing strategies to mitigate agricultural water scarcity risk in high AWSR regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Jiajia & Umer, Muhammad & Zhao, Jun & Li, Qiang & Qu, Mei, 2025. "Does water rights trading cause economic losses from agricultural water scarcity? Evidence from 264 Chinese cities," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:307:y:2025:i:c:s0378377424005699
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424005699
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Hang & Yang, Rui, 2022. "Does agricultural water conservation policy necessarily reduce agricultural water extraction? Evidence from China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    2. Pan, Junyu & Peng, Jie & Yang, Xiaodong & Xuan, Siyuan, 2023. "Does water rights trading promote resources utilisation efficiency and green growth? Evidence from China's resources trading policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    3. Liu, Duan & Yu, Nizhou & Wan, Hong, 2022. "Does water rights trading affect corporate investment? The role of resource allocation and risk mitigation channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Fang, Lin & Zhang, Lin, 2020. "Does the trading of water rights encourage technology improvement and agricultural water conservation?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Guojun He & Shaoda Wang & Bing Zhang, 2020. "Watering Down Environmental Regulation in China," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(4), pages 2135-2185.
    6. Wang, Y.B. & Liu, D. & Cao, X.C. & Yang, Z.Y. & Song, J.F. & Chen, D.Y. & Sun, S.K., 2017. "Agricultural water rights trading and virtual water export compensation coupling model: A case study of an irrigation district in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PA), pages 99-106.
    7. Flannery Dolan & Jonathan Lamontagne & Robert Link & Mohamad Hejazi & Patrick Reed & Jae Edmonds, 2021. "Evaluating the economic impact of water scarcity in a changing world," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Bekchanov, Maksud & Bhaduri, Anik & Ringler, Claudia, 2015. "Potential gains from water rights trading in the Aral Sea Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 41-56.
    9. Cuimei Lv & Huiqin Li & Minhua Ling & Xi Guo & Zening Wu & Changkuan Gu & Yang Li, 2021. "An Innovative Emergy Quantification Method for Eco-economic Compensation for Agricultural Water Rights Trading," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(3), pages 775-792, February.
    10. Sheng, Jichuan & Cheng, Qian & Yang, Hongqiang, 2024. "Water markets and water inequality: China's water rights trading pilot," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng, Jichuan & Zhang, Ruzhu & Yang, Hongqiang & Chen, Cheng, 2025. "Water markets and water rebounds: China's water rights trading policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Fang, Lan & Fu, Yong & Chen, Shaojian & Mao, Hui, 2021. "Can water rights trading pilot policy ensure food security in China? Based on the difference-in-differences method," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(6), pages 1415-1434.
    3. Wu, Zheng & Tian, Guiliang & Xia, Qing & Hu, Hao & Li, Jiawen, 2023. "Connotation, calculation and influencing factors of the water-use rights benchmark price: A case study of agricultural water use in the Ningxia Yellow River irrigation area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Naiming He & Ying Shi & Rijia Ding, 2024. "Does the Water Rights Trading Policy Improve Water-Use Efficiency? An Environmental Policy Evaluation from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Pan, Junyu & Peng, Jie & Yang, Xiaodong & Xuan, Siyuan, 2023. "Does water rights trading promote resources utilisation efficiency and green growth? Evidence from China's resources trading policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    6. Fei, Rilong & Xie, Mengyuan & Wei, Xin & Ma, Ding, 2021. "Has the water rights system reform restrained the water rebound effect? Empirical analysis from China's agricultural sector," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    7. Li, Xuxia & Wang, Huimin & Liu, Gang & Yang, Liu & Fang, Zhou & Xiao, Yi & Lai, Xiaoying & Gao, Li & Teng, Ying, 2025. "An “initial-engineering-end use” quasi-market pricing mechanism under cascading risk for cross-regional water rights trading," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    8. Handong Lyu & Hongfei Xing & Taixiang Duan, 2024. "Optimizing Water Resource Allocation for Food Security: An Evaluation of China’s Water Rights Trading Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, November.
    9. Wang, Yizhong & Hang, Ye & Wang, Qunwei, 2022. "Joint or separate? An economic-environmental comparison of energy-consuming and carbon emissions permits trading in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Chen, Xiang-nan & Wu, Feng-ping & Li, Fang & Zhao, Yue & Xu, Xia, 2022. "Prediction and analysis of water rights trading volume: Based on the water rights trading in Inner Mongolia, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    11. Zhou, Kun & Li, Jianqiang, 2024. "Impact of the comprehensive agricultural water use reform policy on food production: Quasinatural experimental evidence from China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    12. Liu, Duan & Chen, Chang & Yao, Shujie & Yu, Nizhou, 2025. "Environmental litigation risk premium in corporate equity financing costs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    13. Shaojian Chen & Yuanyuan Cao & Jun Li, 2021. "The Effect of Water Rights Trading Policy on Water Resource Utilization Efficiency: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Xu, Xianghui & Chen, Yingshan & Zhou, Yan & Liu, Wuyuan & Zhang, Xinrui & Li, Mo, 2023. "Sustainable management of agricultural water rights trading under uncertainty: An optimization-evaluation framework," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    15. Yang Qianqiu & Song Baoli, 2024. "Research on the impact and mechanisms of lean management on the green development of traditional small and micro manufacturing enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4956-4979, September.
    16. Jonathan Colmer & Ralf Martin & Mirabelle Muûls & Ulrich J. Wagner, 2020. "Does pricing carbon mitigate climate change? Firm-level evidence from the European Union emissions trading scheme," CEP Discussion Papers dp1728, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    17. Xing, Qiuhang & Li, Mengzhe & Xu, Gaoshuang, 2024. "The impact of tax enforcement on corporate energy efficiency: Evidence from a tax collection reform in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    18. Zhang, Ming-ang & Lu, Shuling & Zhang, Sihan & Bai, Yanfeng, 2023. "The unintended consequence of minimum wage hikes: Evidence based on firms' pollution emission," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Sun, Chuanwang & Tie, Ying & Yu, Lili, 2024. "How to achieve both environmental protection and firm performance improvement: Based on China's carbon emissions trading (CET) policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    20. Nazemi, Neda & Foley, Rider W. & Louis, Garrick & Keeler, Lauren Withycombe, 2020. "Divergent agricultural water governance scenarios: The case of Zayanderud basin, Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:307:y:2025:i:c:s0378377424005699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.