IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/v15y2025i6id20280.html

Unpacking Clean and Dirty Energy Market Linkages: Fresh Evidence from Quantile-on-Quantile Connectedness and Causality-in-Quantiles

Author

Listed:
  • Raggad, Bechir

    (Department of Financial Management, College of Business Administration, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, 11952, Saudi Arabia)

  • Neffati, Mohamed

    (Department of Economics, College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ben-Salha, Ousama

    (Humanities and Social Research Center, Northern Border University, P.O. Box 1321, Arar 91431, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This research investigates the interrelationships between clean and dirty energy markets, focusing on both return and volatility dynamics over the period from March 03, 2005 to August 30, 2024. Employing the recently developed quantile-on-quantile connectedness (QQC) framework, alongside a causality-in-quantile (CiQ) analysis, the study explores directional spillovers across varying market conditions. The findings reveal several key insights. First, connectedness is highly heterogeneous across quantiles, with stronger spillovers observed in the tails of the distribution-indicating that extreme market conditions foster intensified transmission between energy sectors. Second, total connectedness among directly related quantiles is consistently higher than that of reversely related quantiles, for both return and volatility spillovers. Third, the connectedness between clean and dirty energy markets surpasses that between clean energy and WTI crude oil, reflecting tighter financial integration between equity-based energy indices. Notably, while the dirty energy market initially receives shocks from the clean market, it later emerges as a shock transmitter. Meanwhile, WTI plays a more symmetric role in return spillovers but predominantly transmits volatility shocks at moderate to higher quantiles. Additionally, quantile-based spillovers show marked time variation, spiking during systemic events such as the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. CiQ analysis confirms the existence of bidirectional causality. These findings have important implications: for policymakers, they highlight the need to account for sectoral interdependence in energy transition planning; for investors, they underscore the limited hedging capacity between clean and dirty energy assets and the necessity of quantile-aware risk management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Raggad, Bechir & Neffati, Mohamed & Ben-Salha, Ousama, 2025. "Unpacking Clean and Dirty Energy Market Linkages: Fresh Evidence from Quantile-on-Quantile Connectedness and Causality-in-Quantiles," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 15(6), pages 129-143, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:6:id:20280
    DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.20280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/20280/9290
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32479/ijeep.20280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:6:id:20280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.