Microfinance Regulation In Jordan: A Comparative Perspective With Mena Countries And Other Areas
Due to the expansion of microfinance institutions? (MFIs), it has been increasingly recognized that MFIs activities need to be brought under the financial sector?s regulatory framework. In many countries, this framework is underdeveloped, in others partially applied. To ensure a fully informed policymaking process, it is important to examine the lessons of experience from the countries that have begun to address the legal and regulatory framework for microfinance. One can learn from good practice as well as from misguided practice. This paper aims to provide the necessary comparative data and analysis to support sound regulatory policy for MFIs in Jordan. When it comes to regulating MFIs, one needs to keep in mind the differences between these institutions as a group, on one hand, and the existing regulated institutions on the other hand. Some opinions suggest that institutions which do not take savings do not justify regulation. However, many countries do regulate credit-only institutions, and indeed the need for transparency, market stability, and control of unfair practices suggests that some regulation is often needed. Regulation and supervision need to be targeted in such a way that their benefits in terms of depositor protection and the safety of the financial system generally outweigh the costs and risks involved. This inevitably means that only certain classes of institutions receive full regulation, while others face less strict control, and some will not be regulated at all. This paper concludes lessons to policy makers in the field of regulation of MFIs in Jordan to attain the final goal of expanding access to financial services for the benefit of poverty reduction and economic development.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 11 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.usc.es/economet/eaa.htm|
|Order Information:|| Web: http://www.usc.es/economet/info.htm Email: |
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Arun, Thankom, 2005. "Regulating for development: the case of microfinance," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 346-357, May.
- Conning, Jonathan, 1999. "Outreach, sustainability and leverage in monitored and peer-monitored lending," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 51-77, October.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eaa:aeinde:v:11:y:2011:i:1_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (M. Carmen Guisan)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.