IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/80-2-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Angemessene und nachhaltige Renten für alle?: Die geschlechtsspezifische Wirkung des deutschen Rentensystems

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Frericks

Abstract

All across the world, pension systems are undergoing considerable change. Public pension systems have been reformed and parts of the formerly public social provision have been shifted to market based provisions. The normative pretensions of European welfare states, however, remain unchanged aiming at poverty prevention and "adequate and sustainable pensions for all" (EC-Report 2006). Current pension reforms, thereby, aim at enabling future pensioners to build up "adequate pensions" by combining public and market-related pensions. Comparative empirical studies have shown, however, that huge parts of the future pensioners will not be able to comply with this combined pension design, while pension systems strongly differ in their capacity to realise adequate and sustainable pensions. Aim of this contribution is to elaborate on Germany's current design of pension regulations and to analyse in how far it enables also women to build up so-called adequate entitlements for their old-age. Rentensysteme befinden sich derzeit in einem umfassenden Veränderungsprozess. Öffentliche Regelungssysteme werden neu formiert und zum Teil durch marktbezogene Systeme ersetzt. Dabei bleiben die normativen Ansprüche europäischer Wohlfahrtsstaaten unverändert: Neben der Armutsvermeidung sollen "angemessene und nachhaltige Renten für alle" (EC-Report 2006) realisiert werden. Gegenwärtige Rentenreformen zielen darauf ab, zukünftigen Rentnern den Aufbau "angemessener Renten" durch eine Kombination von gesetzlichen und marktbezogenen Regelungssystemen zu ermöglichen. International vergleichende empirische Studien zeigen jedoch, dass eine große Mehrheit zukünftiger Rentner und Rentnerinnen diesen Rentensystemen nicht wird entsprechen können. Dabei unterscheiden sich Alterssicherungssysteme in ihrem Vermögen, Armutsvermeidung, angemessene Renten und Nachhaltigkeit zu verwirklichen. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, die Konzeption des aktuellen Rentensystems in Deutschland aufzuzeigen und dabei insbesondere der Frage nachzugehen, inwiefern es auch Frauen ermöglicht, sogenannte angemessene Rentenanwartschaften, die unter dem Begriff des "Eckrentners" bekannt sind, aufzubauen.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Frericks, 2011. "Angemessene und nachhaltige Renten für alle?: Die geschlechtsspezifische Wirkung des deutschen Rentensystems," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(2), pages 119-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:80-2-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/doi/pdf/10.3790/vjh.80.2.119
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hills, John, 2004. "Inequality and the State," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199276646.
    2. Karl Hinrichs, 2005. "New Century – New Paradigm: Pension Reforms in Germany," Chapters,in: Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World, chapter 3 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Barr, Nicholas, 2004. "Economics of the Welfare State," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 4, number 9780199264971.
    4. Nullmeier, Frank & Ruland, Franz & Schmähl, Winfried, 2008. "Alterssicherung im Umbruch," Working papers of the ZeS 02/2008, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    5. Barr, Nicholas & Diamond, Peter, 2008. "Reforming Pensions: Principles and Policy Choices," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195311303.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Adequate pensions; gender; Germany; pension reforms;

    JEL classification:

    • E61 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Policy Objectives; Policy Designs and Consistency; Policy Coordination
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
    • P1 - Economic Systems - - Capitalist Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:80-2-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.