IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/78-4-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formen des politischen Terrorismus: ein Plädoyer für eine Differentialdiagnose

Author

Listed:
  • Ekkart Zimmermann

Abstract

The aim of the present article is to derive a more precise definition of political terrorism based on a minimal set of criteria (part 1). In part 2 typologies of violence are at issue with an emphasis on sub-state groups and political terrorism. Thereafter (part 3) a multi-level causal model is developed. This model emphasizes different levels of explanation, from the individual level via the group level and the state level to the global level. Also a few examples of causal relationships to be derived from such a model are given. Part 4 deals with some political conclusions to be obtained from more disaggregated analyses of political terrorism and the impact such analyses might have on terrorism research. The author strongly pleads for breaking down cross-national datasets according to type of terrorism and for paying more attention to the specific characteristics of different forms of political terrorism, both in analysis and in reacting to it. Ziel dieses Beitrag ist die Herausarbeitung einer präziseren Definition des Terrorismus anhand eines Minimalsatzes an Kriterien (Teil 1). Sodann werden verschiedene Typologien des Terrorismus diskutiert, mit Schwerpunkt auf substaatlichem politischem Terrorismus (Teil 2). Anschließend wird ein Kausalmodell des Terrorismus auf vier Erklärungsebenen entwickelt, von der individuellen über die Gruppen- und Organisationsebene bis zur staatlichen und globalen Ebene. Kausale Zusammenhänge zwischen den einzelnen Ebenen werden erörtert (Teil 3). Einige Folgerungen aus einer solchen Differenzierung der Formen des politischen Terrorismus und unterschiedlicher Erklärungsebenen für "angemessene" Reaktionen auf die jeweilige Form des Terrorismus wie auch die Terrorismusforschung allgemein werden abschließend (Teil 4) behandelt. Der Autor spricht sich für eine stärkere Disaggregierung der internationalen Datensätze nach den unterschiedlichen Formen des politischen Terrorismus aus. Dies hat deutliche Folgen für die empirische Theoriebildung wie auch politische Antwortmuster.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekkart Zimmermann, 2009. "Formen des politischen Terrorismus: ein Plädoyer für eine Differentialdiagnose," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 78(4), pages 11-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:78-4-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/DH/doi/pdf/10.3790/vjh.78.4.11
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Hilsenrath, 2005. "Health Policy As Counter-Terrorism: Health Services And The Palestinians," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 365-374.
    2. Bruno S. Frey, 2004. "Dealing with Terrorism – Stick or Carrot?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3435.
    3. Easton, David, 1975. "A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(04), pages 435-457, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kis-Katos, Krisztina & Liebert, Helge & Schulze, Günther G., 2014. "On the heterogeneity of terror," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 116-136.
    2. Zimmermann, Ekkart, 2011. "Globalization and terrorism," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(S1), pages 152-161.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Political terrorism; public goods; international conflict; conflict interaction;

    JEL classification:

    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:78-4-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.