IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dij/revfcs/v11y2008iq1p41-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les démarches prospectives:de l’aide à la décision à la conduite du changement

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Philippe Bootz

    (Université de Franche-Comté)

  • Régine Monti

    (GERPA)

Abstract

(VF)Ce travail exploratoire se centre sur l’analyse des dimensions cognitives de la prospective stratégi-que à travers la construction d’une typologie. Cet exercice de réinterprétation des pratiques de prospective à la lumière des théories de l’apprentissage constitue, d’une part, une grille de lecture permettant aux praticiens de concevoir et de conduire des démarches adaptées aux différents besoins des organisations en prenant en compte leurs dimensions cognitives implicites. Il permet, d’autre part, de considérer qu’au-delà de son rôle traditionnel d’outil d’aide à la décision, la prospective peut être appréhendée comme un outil de management des connaissances et de conduite du changement.(VA)This exploratory work focuses on the analysis of the cognitive dimensions of strategic prospecting through the construction of a typology. This reinterpretation of forecasting practices in the light of organizational learning theories constitutes, on the one hand, a conceptual framework enabling managers to conceive and implement processes adapted to various organizations’ needs by taking into account their implicit cognitive dimensions. It allows, on the other hand, to stress that beyond its traditional role of assistance in decision making, prospecting may also be regarded as a knowledge manage-ment tool and driver of organizational change.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Philippe Bootz & Régine Monti, 2008. "Les démarches prospectives:de l’aide à la décision à la conduite du changement," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(1), pages 41-70, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:11:y:2008:i:q1:p:41-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-crego.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/rev/111070.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Philippe Bootz, 2005. "La prospective, un outil de création de connaissances : perspective cognitive et observation participante," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 8(3), pages 5-27, September.
    2. Cowan, Robin & David, Paul A & Foray, Dominique, 2000. "The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 211-253, June.
    3. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2002. "Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 249-273, June.
    4. Patrick Cohendet & Morad Diani, 2003. "L'organisation comme une communauté de communautés croyances collectives et culture d'entreprise," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 113(5), pages 697-720.
    5. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 1991. "Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 40-57, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Djuricic, Ksenija & Bootz, Jean-Philippe, 2019. "Effectuation and foresight – An exploratory study of the implicit links between the two concepts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 115-128.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bootz, Jean-Philippe & Monti, Régine & Durance, Philippe & Pacini, Vincent & Chapuy, Pierre, 2019. "The links between French school of foresight and organizational learning: An assessment of developments in the last ten years," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 92-104.
    2. Claude Paraponaris & Martine Sigal, 2015. "From knowledge to knowing, from boundaries to boundary construction," Post-Print halshs-01208528, HAL.
    3. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Le passage des frontières : difficultés et perspectives. L’expérience des frontières cognitives," Post-Print halshs-01579851, HAL.
    4. Hong, Jacky Fok Loi & Snell, Robin Stanley & Easterby-Smith, Mark, 2009. "Knowledge flow and boundary crossing at the periphery of a MNC," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 539-554, December.
    5. Verena Brinks, 2016. "Situated affect and collective meaning: A community perspective on processes of value creation and commercialization in enthusiast-driven fields," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(6), pages 1152-1169, June.
    6. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    7. Agterberg, M. & Huysman, M. & Hooff, B. van den, 2008. "Leadership in online knowledge networks : challenges and coping strategies in a network of practice," Serie Research Memoranda 0004, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    8. Elizabeth Long Lingo, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Leadership as Creative Brokering: The Process and Practice of Co‐creating and Advancing Opportunity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 962-1001, July.
    9. Patrick Regnér & Udo Zander, 2011. "Knowledge and Strategy Creation in Multinational Companies," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 821-850, December.
    10. Benjamin Cabanes & Pascal Le Masson & Benoît Weil, 2020. "Organiser la création de connaissance pour l’innovation de rupture. Des communautés aux sociétés proto-épistémiques d’experts," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 35-60.
    11. Parolin, Laura Lucia & Mattozzi, Alvise, 2014. "Reprint of “Sensitive translations: Sensitive dimension and knowledge within two craftsmen's workplaces”," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 292-305.
    12. Frédéric CREPLET, 2004. "Les Portails d’entreprise : une réponse aux dimensions de l’entreprise « processeur de connaissances »," Working Papers of BETA 2004-07, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    13. Carole Groleau & Christiane Demers & Mireille Lalancette & Marcos Barros, 2012. "From Hand Drawings to Computer Visuals: Confronting Situated and Institutionalized Practices in an Architecture Firm," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 651-671, June.
    14. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    15. Simon Turner, 2013. "Absorptive Capacity: The Role of Communities of Practice," Working Papers wp444, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    16. Ibert, Oliver, 2004. "Projects and firms as discordant complements: organisational learning in the Munich software ecology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1529-1546, December.
    17. Ash Amin & Patrick Cohendet, 2012. "The Firm as a ‘Platform of Communities': A Contribution to the Knowledge-based Approach of the Firm," Chapters, in: Richard Arena & Agnès Festré & Nathalie Lazaric (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge and Economics, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Janowicz-Panjaitan, Martyna & Noorderhaven, Niels G., 2008. "Formal and informal interorganizational learning within strategic alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1337-1355, September.
    19. Heydebrand, Wolf, 2009. "Accounting for great expectations: Lessons from the new media surge for critical management theory," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 418-444.
    20. Mike Bartholomaei, 2005. "To Know is to Be: Three Perspectives on the Codification of Knowledge," SPRU Working Paper Series 131, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    prospective; création de connaissances; apprentissage organisationnel; communauté de pratique; communauté épistémique; prospecting; knowledge creation; organizational learning; community of practice; epistemic community.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:11:y:2008:i:q1:p:41-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Informatique Technique MSH Dijon (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.revues.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.