IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v54y2026i34.html

Economic resources and parity among US women: A conjoint experiment on preferred family scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Behrman

    (Northwestern University)

  • Emily Marshall

    (Franklin & Marshall College)

  • Christine Percheski

    (Northwestern University)

Abstract

Background: Economically insecure conditions may be driving young people’s decisions to delay, forgo, or reduce childbearing. Yet establishing a causal link between economic resources and fertility is methodologically fraught. One approach has been to use survey experiments to manipulate hypothetical economic conditions and gauge respondents’ fertility preferences. Objective: Unlike survey experiments that manipulate economic circumstances and then ask about fertility preferences, our experiment varies both hypothetical economic circumstances and hypothetical parity to test the hypothesis that US women will prefer family scenarios with more (compared to fewer) children under conditions of high economic resources and with fewer (compared to more) children under conditions of low economic resources. Methods: In an online conjoint survey experiment with a nationally representative sample of US women aged 18–35 (n = 1,794), respondents chose between different family scenarios comprised of randomly varied attributes, including parity and economic resources. We examine how these two attributes interact to predict preferred family scenarios. Results: There was no evidence that respondents preferred family scenarios with more (compared to fewer) children under conditions of high economic resources or preferred family scenarios with fewer (compared to more) children under conditions of low economic resources. Contribution: We provide new experimental evidence about whether economic resources and parity interact to predict preferred family scenarios. Our findings are consistent with scholarship suggesting that although economic factors shape decisions about family life, the rational-actor framework is insufficient for understanding contemporary US fertility declines.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Behrman & Emily Marshall & Christine Percheski, 2026. "Economic resources and parity among US women: A conjoint experiment on preferred family scenarios," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 54(34), pages 1095-1124.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:54:y:2026:i:34
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2026.54.34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol54/34/54-34.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2026.54.34?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2020. "The Rise of Income and Wealth Inequality in America: Evidence from Distributional Macroeconomic Accounts," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(4), pages 3-26, Fall.
    2. Pritchett, Lant H. & DEC, 1994. "Desired fertility and the impact of population policies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1273, The World Bank.
    3. Daniele Vignoli & Alessandra Minello & Giacomo Bazzani & Camilla Matera & Chiara Rapallini, 2022. "Narratives of the Future Affect Fertility: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(1), pages 93-124, March.
    4. Brian Nolan & Matteo G. Richiardi & Luis Valenzuela, 2019. "The Drivers Of Income Inequality In Rich Countries," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1285-1324, September.
    5. Timothy M. Smeeding, 2005. "Public Policy, Economic Inequality, and Poverty: The United States in Comparative Perspective," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 86(s1), pages 955-983, December.
    6. Daniel Schneider & Orestes Hastings, 2015. "Socioeconomic Variation in the Effect of Economic Conditions on Marriage and Nonmarital Fertility in the United States: Evidence From the Great Recession," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(6), pages 1893-1915, December.
    7. David E. Bloom & Michael Kuhn & Klaus Prettner, 2024. "Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 159-184, August.
    8. Sarah R. Brauner-Otto & Claudia Geist, 2018. "Uncertainty, Doubts, and Delays: Economic Circumstances and Childbearing Expectations Among Emerging Adults," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 88-102, March.
    9. Nathan Seltzer, 2019. "Beyond the Great Recession: Labor Market Polarization and Ongoing Fertility Decline in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(4), pages 1463-1493, August.
    10. Gornick, Janet C. & Jäntti, Markus, 2012. "Child poverty in cross-national perspective: Lessons from the Luxembourg Income Study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 558-568.
    11. Diana C. Mutz & Robin Pemantle & Philip Pham, 2019. "The Perils of Balance Testing in Experimental Design: Messy Analyses of Clean Data," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 32-42, January.
    12. Kasey Buckles & Daniel Hungerman & Steven Lugauer, 2021. "Is Fertility a Leading Economic Indicator?," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(634), pages 541-565.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen Benjamin Guzzo & Anna Belykh & Wendy Manning & Monica Longmore & Peggy Giordano & Sara Roza, 2025. "Perceptions of the Future and Pregnancy Avoidance in the U.S," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(3), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Singh, Parvati & Gemmill, Alison & Bruckner, Tim-Allen, 2023. "Casino-based cash transfers and fertility among the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians in North Carolina: A time-series analysis," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    3. Anna Matysiak & Daniele Vignoli, 2024. "Family Life Courses, Uncertain Futures, and the Changing World of Work: State-of-the-Art and Prospects," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 40(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Karel Neels & Leen Marynissen & Jonas Wood, 2024. "Economic Cycles and Entry into Parenthood: Is the Association Changing and Does it Affect Macro-Level Trends? Micro-Level Hazard and Simulation Models of Belgian Fertility Trends, 1960–2010," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 40(1), pages 1-34, December.
    5. Karen Benjamin Guzzo & Sarah R. Hayford, 2023. "Evolving Fertility Goals and Behaviors in Current U.S. Childbearing Cohorts," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 49(1), pages 7-42, March.
    6. Nathan Seltzer, 2019. "Beyond the Great Recession: Labor Market Polarization and Ongoing Fertility Decline in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(4), pages 1463-1493, August.
    7. Laura A. Harvey & Jochen O. Mierau & James Rockey, 2024. "Inequality in an Equal Society," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 86(4), pages 871-904, August.
    8. Shiqi Wang & Shuiying Zhong, 2022. "Economic Uncertainty, Cultural and Ideational Transition, and Low Fertility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Karen Benjamin Guzzo, 2022. "The Formation and Realization of Fertility Goals Among a US Cohort in the Post‐Recession Years," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 991-1026, December.
    10. Daniël C. Wijk & Helga A. G. Valk & Aart C. Liefbroer, 2022. "Economic Precariousness and the Transition to Parenthood: A Dynamic and Multidimensional Approach," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(3), pages 457-483, August.
    11. Daniël van Wijk & Francesco C. Billari, 2024. "Fertility Postponement, Economic Uncertainty, and the Increasing Income Prerequisites of Parenthood," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 50(2), pages 287-322, June.
    12. David M. Zimmer, 2026. "The long-run effects of recessions on fertility," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Anna Matysiak & Tomáš Sobotka & Daniele Vignoli, 2021. "The Great Recession and Fertility in Europe: A Sub-national Analysis," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(1), pages 29-64, March.
    14. Héctor Bellido & Miriam Marcén, 2019. "Fertility and the business cycle: the European case," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1289-1319, December.
    15. Martha J. Bailey & Lea Bart & Vanessa Wanner Lang, 2022. "The Missing Baby Bust: The Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic for Contraceptive Use, Pregnancy, and Childbirth Among Low-Income Women," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1549-1569, August.
    16. Vincent Jerald Ramos & Michaela Kreyenfeld & Enrique Alonso-Perez & Paul Gellert & Jan Paul Heisig & Julie Lorraine O’Sullivan, 2025. "Future Caregiving Responsibilities, Employment Uncertainties, and Expected Childbearing Behavior: Survey Experimental Evidence from Germany," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(5), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Thaís García-Pereiro & Roberta Pace & Raffaella Patimo & Roberta Misuraca, 2024. "Fertility and unemployment in times of crisis in Italy," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 78(2), pages 208-210, April-Jun.
    18. Wei-hsin Yu & Shengwei Sun, 2018. "Fertility responses to individual and contextual unemployment: Differences by socioeconomic background," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(35), pages 927-962.
    19. Zehranur Sanioğlu-Tanış & Duygu Dündar-Öztaşçı & İbrahim Özmen, 2025. "Fertility and women unemployment: new evidence from Türkiye," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 1-39, December.
    20. Elisa Brini & Raffaele Guetto & Daniele Vignoli, 2025. "A research note on the increasing income prerequisites of parenthood. Country-specific or universal in Western Europe?," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2025_05, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:54:y:2026:i:34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.