IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxn/cognit/v2y2025i1id6.html

Design principles in programming languages and their impact on software quality

Author

Listed:
  • Segundo Alexander Rosado Martínez

    (Universidad Estatal de Milagro. Milagro, Ecuador.)

Abstract

This study analyzes the fundamental principles that guide the design of modern programming languages, highlighting their impact on software quality. Based on a qualitative approach and a documentary analysis of scientific literature, three essential pillars were identified: correctness, maintainability, and performance. The results show that correctness is the primary objective, as it enables the development of programs that fulfill their intended purpose while minimizing errors from early stages through mechanisms such as strict type systems, compile-time validation, and clear abstractions. Regarding maintainability, it was found that principles such as modularity, low coupling, high cohesion, encapsulation, and separation of concerns facilitate the understanding, modification, and evolution of software, especially in dynamic development environments. On the other hand, performance, although secondary to the previous aspects, remains essential, as it ensures efficient program execution through techniques such as optimized compilation and predictable execution models. Furthermore, a direct relationship among these three principles was identified, showing that correctness enhances maintainability, which in turn contributes to improved performance. The analysis of the Wybe programming language served as an example of how these principles can be integrated into a concrete design proposal. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that a balanced approach among correctness, maintainability, and performance is key to developing reliable, adaptable, and efficient software.

Suggested Citation

  • Segundo Alexander Rosado Martínez, 2025. "Design principles in programming languages and their impact on software quality," CognitivaTech: Ingenieria de Software Inteligente y Sistemas Adaptativos, Facultad Técnica de la Universidad Tecnica de Oruro, vol. 2(1), pages 1-6, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxn:cognit:v:2:y:2025:i:1:id:6
    DOI: 10.63688/cognitivatech.v2.i1.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cognitivatech.org/index.php/cognitivatech/article/view/6
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://cognitivatech.org/index.php/cognitivatech/article/download/6/34
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63688/cognitivatech.v2.i1.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. S. Krishnan & C. H. Kriebel & Sunder Kekre & Tridas Mukhopadhyay, 2000. "An Empirical Analysis of Productivity and Quality in Software Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 745-759, June.
    2. Rajiv D. Banker & Gordon B. Davis & Sandra A. Slaughter, 1998. "Software Development Practices, Software Complexity, and Software Maintenance Performance: A Field Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 433-450, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramanath Subramanyam & Narayan Ramasubbu & M. S. Krishnan, 2012. "In Search of Efficient Flexibility: Effects of Software Component Granularity on Development Effort, Defects, and Customization Effort," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 787-803, September.
    2. Iván Alfaro & Ranganathan Chandrasekaran, 2015. "Software Quality and Development Speed in Global Software Development Teams," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(2), pages 91-102, April.
    3. Rajiv D. Banker & Robert J. Kauffman, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 281-298, March.
    4. Paulson Gjerde, Kathy A. & Slotnick, Susan A., 2004. "Quality and reputation: The effects of external and internal factors over time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Euy-Young Jung & Chulwoo Baek & Jeong-Dong Lee, 2012. "Product survival analysis for the App Store," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 929-941, December.
    6. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.
    7. Arora, Ashish & Forman, Chris & Nandkumar, Anand & Telang, Rahul, 2010. "Competition and patching of security vulnerabilities: An empirical analysis," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 164-177, May.
    8. Rajiv D. Banker & Indranil Bardhan & Ozer Asdemir, 2006. "Understanding the Impact of Collaboration Software on Product Design and Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 352-373, December.
    9. Sundarraj, R. P., 2002. "An optimization approach to plan for reusable software components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 128-137, October.
    10. Kutsal Doğan & Yonghua Ji & Vijay S. Mookerjee & Suresh Radhakrishnan, 2011. "Managing the Versions of a Software Product Under Variable and Endogenous Demand," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 5-21, March.
    11. Yipeng Liu & Hong Guo & Barrie R. Nault, 2017. "Organization of Public Safety Networks: Spillovers, Interoperability, and Participation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 704-723, April.
    12. A S M Monjurul Hasan & Andrea Trianni, 2020. "A Review of Energy Management Assessment Models for Industrial Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Il-Horn Hann & Jeffrey A. Roberts & Sandra A. Slaughter, 2013. "All Are Not Equal: An Examination of the Economic Returns to Different Forms of Participation in Open Source Software Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 520-538, September.
    14. Bagchi, Kallol & Kirs, Peeter & Udo, Godwin & Cerveny, Robert, 2015. "Characteristics and determinants of insourced and offshored projects: A comparative analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 108-121.
    15. Yili Hong & Paul A. Pavlou, 2017. "On Buyer Selection of Service Providers in Online Outsourcing Platforms for IT Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 547-562, September.
    16. Rajiv Banker & Yi Liang & Narayan Ramasubbu, 2021. "Technical Debt and Firm Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 3174-3194, May.
    17. He, Yan-Qun & Chan, Lai-Kow & Wu, Ming-Lu, 2007. "Balancing productivity and consumer satisfaction for profitability: Statistical and fuzzy regression analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 252-263, January.
    18. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Wael Jabr & Dennis Kundisch, 2020. "The Fate of the App: Economic Implications of Updating under Reputation Resetting," Working Papers Dissertations 76, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    19. Zeynep Ton, 2008. "The Effect of Labor on Profitability: The Role of Quality," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-040, Harvard Business School, revised Jul 2009.
    20. F. Ted Tschang, 2011. "A Comparison of the Industrialization Paths for Asian Services Outsourcing Industries, and Implications for Poverty Alleviation," ADBI Working Papers 313, Asian Development Bank Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxn:cognit:v:2:y:2025:i:1:id:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial JOGB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cognitivatech.org/index.php/cognitivatech .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.