IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxa/eu2025/v1y2025i1p386-408.html

A Comparative Historical Analysis Of Traditional Asset Classes In The European Union: The Case Of Hedge Funds

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Stockbauer

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi)

Abstract

The paper at hand provides a comparative historical analysis of the role of hedge funds within the global financial system, with a specific focus on their interactions with traditional asset classes such as equities and bonds. Hedge funds, known for their high leverage, active management, and diverse, often sophisticated investment strategies, have emerged as pivotal players in financial markets. These characteristics enable hedge funds to enhance market efficiency through liquidity provision, price discovery, and offering diversification benefits that are not readily achievable through conventional asset classes. However, their speculative nature, complexity, and reliance on leverage also introduce significant concerns related to financial stability, particularly during periods of market stress. This study historically analyses how hedge funds and traditional asset classes respond to and recover from systemic shocks. The research methodology includes an analysis of performance metrics, recovery rates, and volatility patterns across various crises, highlighting the differential impacts on hedge funds versus equities and bonds. Empirical findings suggest that hedge funds generally exhibit higher resilience and quicker recovery from financial disruptions. This advantage is largely attributable to their flexible strategies, active risk management, and ability to dynamically reallocate capital in response to changing market conditions. The potential for rapid deleveraging, liquidity crises, and contagion effects during downturns underscores the dual nature of hedge funds as both stabilizers and potential destabilizers within the financial ecosystem. The findings have critical implications for policymakers, investors, and regulators aiming to strike a balance between fostering financial innovation and maintaining systemic stability. While hedge funds can contribute positively to market efficiency and resilience, their capacity to propagate risk necessitates ongoing regulatory oversight and prudent risk management practices. A deeper understanding of these dynamics is essential for developing frameworks that can harness the benefits of hedge funds while mitigating their potential threats to financial stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Stockbauer, 2025. "A Comparative Historical Analysis Of Traditional Asset Classes In The European Union: The Case Of Hedge Funds," EUFIRE Conference Proceedings Series, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Publisher, vol. 1(1), pages 386-408, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cxa:eu2025:v:1:y:2025:i:1:p:386-408
    DOI: 10.47743/eufire-2025-1-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eufire.uaic.ro/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/30_Stockbauer_386_408.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47743/eufire-2025-1-30?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, Michael R. & Maier, Philipp, 2009. "Hedge funds and financial stability: Regulating prime brokers will mitigate systemic risks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 283-297, September.
    2. Serdar Çelik & Mats Isaksson, 2014. "Institutional investors and ownership engagement," OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, OECD Publishing, vol. 2013(2), pages 93-114.
    3. Moh’d Al-Azzam, 2019. "Financing microfinance institutions: subsidies or deposit mobilisation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(15), pages 1621-1633, March.
    4. Mikhail Walden & Paul Lajbcygier, 2023. "Nonlinear hedge fund index clones?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(1), pages 147-170, February.
    5. Spencer Andrews & Salil Gadgil, 2024. "The Who and How of Hedge Fund Risk Shifting," Working Papers 24-07, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    6. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    7. repec:idn:journl:v:19:y:2017:i:3:p:1-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Yawen Jiao, 2013. "Hedge Funds and Equity Prices," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 17(3), pages 1141-1177.
    9. Martin F. Hellwig, 2014. "Financial Stability, Monetary Policy, Banking Supervision, and Central Banking," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics 2014_09, Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics.
    10. repec:idn:journl:v:19:y:2017:i:3c:p:319-334 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Tomas Garbaravicius & Frank Dierick, 2005. "Hedge funds and their implications for financial stability," Occasional Paper Series 34, European Central Bank.
    12. Clifford, Christopher P., 2008. "Value creation or destruction? Hedge funds as shareholder activists," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 323-336, September.
    13. René M. Stulz, 2007. "Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 175-194, Spring.
    14. Turan G. Bali & Florian Weigert, 2024. "Hedge funds and the positive idiosyncratic volatility effect," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 28(5), pages 1611-1661.
    15. Klaus Adam & Sebastian Merkel, 2019. "Stock Price Cycles and Business Cycles," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2019_105, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    16. Garbaravicius, Tomas & Dierick, Frank, 2005. "Hedge funds and their implications for financial stability," Occasional Paper Series 34, European Central Bank.
    17. Liangbo Zhai & Wei Wang, 2023. "Can Winners Keep Winning? An Analysis Of Performance Persistence Of Mutual Funds And Hedge Funds In China," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 68(06), pages 2029-2050, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert M. Hull & Sungkyu Kwak & Rosemary Walker, 2018. "Hedge fund attributes, insider behavior, and IPO volatility," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 42(2), pages 268-292, April.
    2. Robert Hull & Sungkyu Kwak & Rosemary Walker, 2014. "Hedge fund attributes and volatility around equity offerings," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 38(3), pages 359-382, July.
    3. Mark D. Flood & Phillip Monin, 2016. "Form PF and Hedge Funds: Risk-measurement Precision for Option Portfolios," Working Papers 16-02, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    4. Patrick M McGuire & Kostas Tsatsaronis, 2008. "Estimating hedge fund leverage," BIS Working Papers 260, Bank for International Settlements.
    5. Anisa Safiah Maznorbalia & Muhammad Aiman Awalluddin & Ardzlyn Hawatul Yuhanis Ayob, 2023. "Exploring the role of institutional investors in voting, monitoring and dialogue engagement in mitigating agency conflict in Malaysia’s public listed companies," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Bengtsson, E., 2013. "Fund Management and Systemic Risk - Lessons from the Global Financial Crisis," CITYPERC Working Paper Series 2013-06, Department of International Politics, City St George's, University of London.
    7. René M. Stulz, 2007. "Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 175-194, Spring.
    8. Winkler, Adalbert & Geis, André & Böwer, Uwe, 2007. "Commodity price fluctuations and their impact on monetary and fiscal policies in Western and Central Africa," Occasional Paper Series 60, European Central Bank.
    9. Chung, Chune Young & Thi Ngoc Dung, Pham & Liu, Chang, 2024. "Institutional blockholder monitoring and stock price crash risk," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Russo, Daniela & Caviglia, Giacomo & Papathanassiou, Chryssa & Rosati, Simonetta, 2007. "Prudential and oversight requirements for securities settlement," Occasional Paper Series 76, European Central Bank.
    11. Oehler, Andreas & Schmitz, Jonas Tobias, 2021. "Does intensified communication of hedge funds with letters affect abnormal returns?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 127-142.
    12. Yao Zheng & Eric Osmer, 2018. "The Relationship between Hedge Fund Performance and Stock Market Sentiment," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-29, September.
    13. Adalbert Winkler & Roland Beck, 2006. "Macroeconomic and financial stability challenges for acceding and candidate countries," Occasional Paper Series 48, European Central Bank.
    14. Ryan Flugum & Matthew E. Souther, 2020. "External monitoring and returns to hedge fund activist campaigns," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 97-140, January.
    15. Byoung-Hyoun Hwang & Baixiao Liu & Wei Xu, 2019. "Arbitrage Involvement and Security Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2858-2875, June.
    16. Bussière, Matthieu & Hoerova, Marie & Klaus, Benjamin, 2015. "Commonality in hedge fund returns: Driving factors and implications," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 266-280.
    17. González, Fernando & Coppens, François & Winkler, Gerhard, 2007. "The performance of credit rating systems in the assessment of collateral used in Eurosystem monetary policy operations," Occasional Paper Series 65, European Central Bank.
    18. Louis Bê Duc & Gabe de Bondt & Alessandro Calza & David Marqués Ibáñez & Adrian van Rixtel & Silvia Scopel, 2005. "Financing conditions in the euro area," Occasional Paper Series 37, European Central Bank.
    19. Flugum, Ryan & Howe, John S., 2020. "Hedge fund activism and analyst uncertainty," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 206-227.
    20. Schuknecht, Ludger & Morris, Richard & Ongena, Hedwig, 2006. "The reform and implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact," Occasional Paper Series 47, European Central Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxa:eu2025:v:1:y:2025:i:1:p:386-408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mihaela Tofan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.editura.uaic.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.