IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwk/eafjke/2026-25.html

Growth Without Capability: Firm Expansion, Biological Asset Valuation and the Post Listing Erosion of Financial Reporting Quality in Zambia’s First Listed State-Owned Enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Kolala, Paul

    (Kwame Nkrumah University)

  • Chisanga, Daniel

    (Copperbelt University)

Abstract

The governance literature treats firm size as a reliable correlate of financial reporting quality and stock market listing as a durable disciplining mechanism. This study tests both propositions within the underexplored context of a listed state-owned enterprise operating in the forestry sector of a low-income African economy. Using six years of post-listing data from Zambia Forestry and Forest Industries Corporation Plc, the first state-owned enterprise listed on the Lusaka Securities Exchange, the study examines the relationship between firm size and financial reporting quality and evaluates whether reporting quality differed between the early and later post-listing periods. Financial reporting quality is proxied by the ratio of operating cash flow to net income. Given the limited dataset of six annual observations, the analysis employs bivariate correlation and one-way analysis of variance, supported by qualitative analysis of governance documents and stakeholder perspectives. The findings reveal a strong negative association between firm size and financial reporting quality, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.741, significant at the 10 percent level, explaining approximately 55 percent of the variation in reporting quality. Mean reporting quality declined from 0.131 during 2018–2020 to 0.049 during 2021–2023, with the difference statistically significant at the 5 percent level and an eta squared of 0.775. The results suggest that rapid, valuation-intensive asset growth, driven largely by biological assets measured at fair value under International Accounting Standard (IAS) 41, exceeded the accounting and audit capabilities established at listing, weakening the relationship between reported earnings and operating cash flows. The study qualifies the conventional firm-size effect, demonstrates that listing discipline depreciates over time rather than remaining permanent, and provides important implications for securities regulators, government shareholders, and boards of state-owned enterprises in African capital markets. The findings are indicative rather than conclusive and are proposed as a basis for future panel-data research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kolala, Paul & Chisanga, Daniel, 2026. "Growth Without Capability: Firm Expansion, Biological Asset Valuation and the Post Listing Erosion of Financial Reporting Quality in Zambia’s First Listed State-Owned Enterprise," East African Finance Journal, East African Finance Journal, vol. 5(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:cwk:eafjke:2026-25
    DOI: 10.59413/eafj/v5.i3.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijcsacademia.com/index.php/eafj/article/view/668
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.59413/eafj/v5.i3.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dechow, Patricia & Ge, Weili & Schrand, Catherine, 2010. "Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 344-401, December.
    2. Peter Ackah & Emmanuel Mensah & Timothy Azaa Ayamga & Paul Muda & Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan, 2024. "Ownership structure dynamics and firm governance quality: Panel regression evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2420768-242, December.
    3. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    4. Xie, Biao & Davidson, Wallace III & DaDalt, Peter J., 2003. "Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 295-316, June.
    5. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    6. Adrienna Huffman, 2018. "Asset use and the relevance of fair value measurement: evidence from IAS 41," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1274-1314, December.
    7. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hermes, Cornelis & Oxelheim, L. & Randoy, Trond & Hooghiemstra, Reginald, 2015. "The impact of board internationalization on earnings management," Research Report 15010-I&O, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    2. Mohamed Khalil & Aydin Ozkan, 2016. "Board Independence, Audit Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from Egypt," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 15(1), pages 84-118, April.
    3. Osamah Alorayni & Ahmad Riyed Alazzam & Marwan Altarawneh & Hussein Alwreikat, 2026. "Board Characteristics, Audit Committees, and Earnings Manipulation: Examining the Moderating Influence of CEO Power in Jordan's Capital Market," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 152-174.
    4. Ferramosca, Silvia & Allegrini, Marco, 2018. "The complex role of family involvement in earnings management," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 128-141.
    5. Nawal Kasim & Nur Ain Binti Hashim & Syed Ahmed Salman, 2016. "Conceptual Relationship between Corporate Governance and Audit Quality in Shari’ah Compliant Companies Listed on Bursa Malaysia," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(7), pages 106-106, July.
    6. Pavlopoulos, Athanasios & Magnis, Chris & Iatridis, George Emmanuel, 2017. "Integrated reporting: Is it the last piece of the accounting disclosure puzzle?," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 23-46.
    7. Hooghiemstra, Reggy & Hermes, Niels & Oxelheim, Lars & Randøy, Trond, 2019. "Strangers on the board: The impact of board internationalization on earnings management of Nordic firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 119-134.
    8. Nguyen Thi Hoa Hong & Nguyen Thai Anh & Nguyen Tran Viet Hoang & Do Nhat Minh, 2023. "Corporate governance, external financing, and earnings management: new evidence from an emerging market," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Nguyen, Quynh & Kim, Maria H. & Ali, Searat, 2024. "Corporate governance and earnings management: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 775-801.
    10. Ahsan Habib & Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan, 2016. "Problem directors on the audit committee and financial reporting quality," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 121-144, February.
    11. Adi Masli & Matthew G. Sherwood & Rajendra P. Srivastava, 2018. "Attributes and Structure of an Effective Board of Directors: A Theoretical Investigation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(4), pages 485-523, December.
    12. Isabelle Le Breton–Miller & Danny Miller, 2006. "Why Do Some Family Businesses Out–Compete? Governance, Long–Term Orientations, and Sustainable Capability," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(6), pages 731-746, November.
    13. Hessian, Mohamed & Zalata, Alaa Mansour & Hussainey, Khaled, 2025. "Does the board of directors and their stock ownership mitigate interest payment classification shifting? UK evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    14. Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan & Solomon Opare & Zahir Ahmed, 2024. "Does Audit Committee Busyness Affect Financial Restatement? Evidence from Audit Committee Share Ownership," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 34(1), pages 29-54, March.
    15. Chiraz Ben Ali & Frederic Teulon, 2014. "CEO Monitoring and board effectiveness: Resolving CEO compensation issue," Working Papers 2014-45, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    16. Abdullah, Azrul Bin & Ismail, Ku Nor Izah Ku, 2018. "Hedging Activities Information and Risk Management Committee Effectiveness: Malaysian evidence," SocArXiv kxfqe, Center for Open Science.
    17. Hussein A. Abdou & Nouran N. Ellelly & Ahmed A. Elamer & Khaled Hussainey & Hassan Yazdifar, 2021. "Corporate governance and earnings management nexus: Evidence from the UK and Egypt using neural networks," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6281-6311, October.
    18. Sandvik, Jason, 2020. "Board monitoring, director connections, and credit quality☆," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Mouna Mrad & Slaheddine Hallara, 2014. "The Relationship Between the Board of Directors and the Performance/Value Creation in a Context of Privatization: The Case of French Companies," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 83-108, March.
    20. Vincenzo Scafarto & Federica Ricci & Elisabetta Magnaghi & Salvatore Ferri, 2021. "Board structure and intellectual capital efficiency: does the family firm status matter?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 841-878, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • L32 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Enterprises; Public-Private Enterprises

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwk:eafjke:2026-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Charles G. Kamau (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijcsacademia.com/index.php/eafj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.