IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Child-Support Policies and the Well-Being of Children: Income versus Wealth-Based Measures

Listed author(s):
  • Vicky Barham
  • Rose Anne Devlin

Recently, Barham, Devlin and LaCasse (2000) show that the 1997 Child-Support Guidelines fail to meet several standards of adequacy or reasonableness, not surprising given that the standard of living of children depends upon the wealth of the family before separation, yet only the income of the non-custodial parent is taken into account when determining child support. This paper investigates whether a wealth-based child- support scheme would benefit children post-separation. We find that well over 50 percent of separating households "own" their own dwellings; for most families, a wealth-based child-support system would enhance the well-being of children post-divorce.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by University of Toronto Press in its journal Canadian Public Policy.

Volume (Year): 29 (2003)
Issue (Month): 3 (September)
Pages: 351-365

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:29:y:2003:i:3:p:351-365
Contact details of provider: Postal:
University of Toronto Press Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T8

Web page:

Order Information: Web: Email:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Vicky Barham & Rose Anne Devlin & Chantale LaCasse, 2000. "Are the New Child-Support Guidelines "Adequate" or "Reasonable"?," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 26(1), pages 1-15, March.
  2. Michael Charette & Ronald Meng, 1994. "The Determinants of Welfare Participation of Female Heads of Household in Canada," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 290-306, May.
  3. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
  4. Dnes, Antony W., 1999. "Applications of economic analysis to marital law: concerning a proposal to reform the discretionary approach to the division of marital assets in England and Wales," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 533-552, December.
  5. Siddiq, Fazley K & Beach, Charles M, 1995. "Characterizing Life-Cycle Wealth Distributions Using Statistical Inference and Dominance Criteria," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 551-575.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:29:y:2003:i:3:p:351-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Prof. Werner Antweiler)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.