IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v10y2025a9118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-Creating Change: Seedbed Interventions as Catalysts for Equitable Urban Planning—The Case of Umeå

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Gäckle

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, RWTH Aachen University, Germany)

  • Mariia Chebotareva

    (School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Estonia / School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, Estonia)

  • Bianka Plüschke-Altof

    (School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Estonia / School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, Estonia / Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia)

  • Jannis Meul

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, RWTH Aachen University, Germany)

  • Ilkka Väänänen

    (Faculty of Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Finland)

  • Shreya Utkarsh

    (ICLEI European Secretariat, Germany)

  • Axel Timpe

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, RWTH Aachen University, Germany)

  • Frank Lohrberg

    (Institute of Landscape Architecture, RWTH Aachen University, Germany)

  • Taru Suutari

    (Municipality of Lahti, Finland)

  • Eva Maaherra Lovheim

    (Municipality of Umeå, Sweden)

  • Tadhg MacIntyre

    (Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Ireland)

Abstract

The ongoing urbanisation and densification at the intersection with increasing environmental and health crises demand a holistic, equitable, and inclusive approach to urban planning, which has also been highlighted in the EU Green Deal’s inclusive approach to sustainable urban planning aligned with the UN SDGs’ “Leave No One Behind.” This article introduces the seedbed intervention as a novel, community-driven, co-creative approach to Nature-based Solutions (NbS) that addresses gaps in equitable and inclusive urban planning frameworks. On the case of Umeå (Sweden), the article introduces the seedbed intervention approach and demonstrates how the approach facilitates the development of locally appropriate and sustainable NbS. The results show that the seedbed intervention approach improved the alignment between local needs and NbS design, connected diverse user groups, and catalysed curiosity, interest, and participation among citizens with the help of applying art-based methods. By demonstrating the practical application of a seedbed intervention, this research contributes to the development of scalable frameworks for more equitable and inclusive urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Gäckle & Mariia Chebotareva & Bianka Plüschke-Altof & Jannis Meul & Ilkka Väänänen & Shreya Utkarsh & Axel Timpe & Frank Lohrberg & Taru Suutari & Eva Maaherra Lovheim & Tadhg MacIntyre, 2025. "Co-Creating Change: Seedbed Interventions as Catalysts for Equitable Urban Planning—The Case of Umeå," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9118
    DOI: 10.17645/up.9118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/9118
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.9118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. H. Voorberg & V. J. J. M. Bekkers & L. G. Tummers, 2015. "A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1333-1357, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    3. Anne Seneca Terkelsen & Christian Tolstrup Wester & Gabriel Gulis & Jørgen Jespersen & Pernille Tanggaard Andersen, 2022. "Co-Creation and Co-Production of Health Promoting Activities Addressing Older People—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Manuel Alméstar & Sara Romero-Muñoz & Nieves Mestre & Uriel Fogué & Eva Gil & Amanda Masha, 2023. "(Un)Likely Connections between (Un)Likely Actors in the Art/NBS Co-Creation Process: Application of KREBS Cycle of Creativity to the Cyborg Garden Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk & Mateusz Grzesiak, 2020. "Cooperation between Final Purchasers and Offerors in the Online and Offline Environments vs. the Benefits Derived by Active Purchasers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Margaret von Faber & Zsuzsu Tavy & Suzan van der Pas, 2020. "Engaging Older People in Age-Friendly Cities through Participatory Video Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Abdulaziz Aldegheishem, 2024. "Assessing progress towards smart governance in Saudi Arabia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Fatuma Namisango & Kyeong Kang & Ghassan Beydoun, 2022. "How the Structures Provided by Social Media Enable Collaborative Outcomes: A Study of Service Co-creation in Nonprofits," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 517-535, April.
    9. Oluwasoye P. Mafimisebi & Adekunle I. Ogunsade, 2022. "Unlocking a Continent of Opportunity: Entrepreneurship and Digital Ecosystems for Value Creation in Africa," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 11-22, March.
    10. Ricard Esparza-Masana, 2022. "Towards Smart Specialisation 2.0. Main Challenges When Updating Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 635-655, March.
    11. Bradbury-Jones, Caroline & Isham, Louise & Taylor, Julie, 2018. "The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 80-91.
    12. Aurelio Tommasetti & Riccardo Mussari & Gennaro Maione & Daniela Sorrentino, 2020. "Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
    14. Fatima, Samar & Desouza, Kevin C. & Dawson, Gregory S., 2020. "National strategic artificial intelligence plans: A multi-dimensional analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 178-194.
    15. Bokyong Shin & Mikko Rask, 2021. "Assessment of Online Deliberative Quality: New Indicators Using Network Analysis and Time-Series Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Nathalie Colasanti & Chiara Fantauzzi & Rocco Frondizi, 2021. "Innovating Public Service Delivery Through Crowdsourcing: What Role for The Third Sector and Civil Society?," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Magdalena Potz & Solange Hernandez & Sarah Serval, 2024. "From Wicked Problems to the Wickedization of Solutions: The Case of the French Citizens Convention for Climate," Post-Print hal-04714400, HAL.
    18. Hyungjun Seo & Seunghwan Myeong, 2021. "Determinant Factors for Adoption of Government as a Platform in South Korea: Mediating Effects on the Perception of Intelligent Information Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Nathalie Nunes & Emma Björner & Knud Erik Hilding-Hamann, 2021. "Guidelines for Citizen Engagement and the Co-Creation of Nature-Based Solutions: Living Knowledge in the URBiNAT Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-37, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.