IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v10y2025a10273.html

Berlin Mix (Berliner Mischung) Revisited: An Inventory of Commercial Courtyards

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Lingenhöle

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany)

  • Andreas Brück

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany)

  • Lech Suwala

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

The stylised Berlin block or Berliner Mischung (“Berlin Mix,” a form of mixed‐use development) can be defined as a multi‐story inner‐city housing (tenement) and working estate with one or more commercial courtyards from the early days of industrialisation. It features compact and dense rows of shops incorporated into the ground floor of the block facing the street, apartments on the floors above and in the side wings, and diverse commercial activities (retail, crafts, light manufacturing) with storage, production, and workshop facilities in the back and courtyards. Although largely abolished after the Charter of Athens, Berlin’s commercial courtyards often proved resistant and even experienced a renaissance after Germany’s reunification, evolving into a mixture of housing, artisans, industry, trade, and culture. The principal objective of this article is to investigate whether this mixture is still prevalent within commercial courtyards despite gentrification, a decline in manufacturing, and the tertiarisation of the economy, or precisely because of novel technologies, the resurgence of the productive city, and accompanying urban agendas. Methodologically, we investigate functional mixed‐use development using an indicator‐based sample of 35 former Berlin‐owned commercial courtyards (now run by a commercial company), divided into four types of courtyards: Integrated Berlin Mix Courtyards, Adjacent Courtyards, Autonomous Courtyards, and Extended Berlin Mix Courtyards. Our findings reveal several “New Berlin Mix” sub‐types, including an inner‐city Integrated Berlin Mix Courtyard, which loses diversity to Autonomous Courtyards on the outskirts. This raises questions about the limits to the productive city in Berlin and the role of planning amidst these trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Lingenhöle & Andreas Brück & Lech Suwala, 2025. "Berlin Mix (Berliner Mischung) Revisited: An Inventory of Commercial Courtyards," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:10273
    DOI: 10.17645/up.10273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/10273
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.10273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica Ferm & Dimitrios Panayotopoulos-Tsiros & Sam Griffiths, 2021. "Planning Urban Manufacturing, Industrial Building Typologies, and Built Environments: Lessons From Inner London," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 350-367.
    2. Declan Martin & Carl Grodach, 2023. "RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION IN GENTRIFYING URBAN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS: The Experience of Cultural Manufacturers in San Francisco and Melbourne," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 625-644, July.
    3. Kerstin Meyer & Marcel Schonlau, 2024. "Heterogeneity of urban manufacturing – a statistical analysis of manufacturing companies in three German cities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1813-1836, August.
    4. Michael Ryckewaert & Jan Zaman & Sarah De Boeck, 2021. "Variable Arrangements Between Residential and Productive Activities: Conceiving Mixed-Use for Urban Development in Brussels," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 334-349.
    5. Lech Suwala & Robert Kitzmann & Elmar Kulke, 2021. "Berlin’s Manifold Strategies Towards Commercial and Industrial Spaces: The Different Cases of Zukunftsorte," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 415-430.
    6. Michael Ryckewaert & Jan Zaman & Sarah De Boeck, 2021. "Variable Arrangements Between Residential and Productive Activities: Conceiving Mixed-Use for Urban Development in Brussels," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 334-349.
    7. Jessica Ferm, 2016. "Preventing the displacement of small businesses through commercial gentrification: are affordable workspace policies the solution?," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 402-419, August.
    8. Jessica Ferm & Dimitrios Panayotopoulos-Tsiros & Sam Griffiths, 2021. "Planning Urban Manufacturing, Industrial Building Typologies, and Built Environments: Lessons From Inner London," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 350-367.
    9. Alexandros Bartzokas-Tsiompras & Efthimios Bakogiannis, 2023. "Quantifying and visualizing the 15-Minute walkable city concept across Europe: a multicriteria approach," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 2141143-214, December.
    10. Suwala, Lech & Kitzmann, Robert & Kulke, Elmar, 2021. "Berlin’s Manifold Strategies Towards Commercial and Industrial Spaces: The Different Cases of Zukunftsorte," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(3), pages 415-430.
    11. Lech Suwala & Robert Kitzmann & Elmar Kulke, 2021. "Berlin’s Manifold Strategies Towards Commercial and Industrial Spaces: The Different Cases of Zukunftsorte," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 415-430.
    12. Suwala, Lech & Franke, Hendrik, 2025. "Gewerbliche Standortsicherung in Berlin durch Gewerbehöfe : Organisation und Betrieb durch alternative Rechts- und Verbundformen wie Genossenschaften oder Standortgemeinschaften," EconStor Research Reports 335107, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lech Suwala & Robert Kitzmann & Sebastian Henn & Stefan Gärtner, 2025. "Planning for Locally Embedded Economies in the Productive City," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
    2. Lech Suwala & Lukas Becker & Annika Lesem & Clara Schwabe & Tom Weber & Sarah-Juliane Starre, 2025. "Planning for and Designing a Publicly Owned Commercial Courtyard Infrastructure—The Case of Berlin," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lech Suwala & Lukas Becker & Annika Lesem & Clara Schwabe & Tom Weber & Sarah-Juliane Starre, 2025. "Planning for and Designing a Publicly Owned Commercial Courtyard Infrastructure—The Case of Berlin," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
    2. Lech Suwala & Robert Kitzmann & Sebastian Henn & Stefan Gärtner, 2025. "Planning for Locally Embedded Economies in the Productive City," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
    3. Cordula Schwappach & Elke Beyer & Lech Suwala, 2023. "Place-Based Climate-Proofing of Commercial and Industrial Areas: Inventory and Guidelines From a Regional Planning Perspective," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 166-185.
    4. Declan Martin & Carl Grodach, 2023. "RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION IN GENTRIFYING URBAN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS: The Experience of Cultural Manufacturers in San Francisco and Melbourne," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 625-644, July.
    5. Lu, Heli & Lu, Siqi & Li, Huan & Cao, Liang & Han, Zongran & Liu, Fang & Zhang, Chuanrong & Miao, Changhong & Zhang, Xiaoye, 2025. "Estimation of high-resolution emissions using functionally-filtered nighttime lights in monocentric and polycentric cities: Fusion of remotely sensed human activities and social media data for carbon neutral settlements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 401(PA).
    6. Mohammed Mashary Alnaim & Abdelhakim Mesloub & Chaham Alalouch & Emad Noaime, 2025. "Reclaiming the Urban Streets: Evaluating Accessibility and Walkability in the City of Hail’s Streetscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-41, March.
    7. Carol Ludwig & Seraphim Alvanides, 2023. "A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of the Urban Fabric of Nuremberg From the 1940s Onwards Using Historical Maps," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 239-254.
    8. Jane Clossick & Mark Brearley, 2023. "Auditing, Revealing and Promoting Industry in the London Borough of Southwark," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 211-224.
    9. Johanne Heesche & Ellen Marie Braae & Gertrud Jørgensen, 2022. "Landscape-Based Transformation of Young Industrial Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Ingmar Pastak & Eneli Kindsiko & Tiit Tammaru & Reinout Kleinhans & Maarten Van Ham, 2019. "Commercial Gentrification in Post‐Industrial Neighbourhoods: A Dynamic View From an Entrepreneur’s Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(5), pages 588-604, December.
    11. Popescu, Irina Alina & Nicolescu, Luminita, 2025. "How ’Smart’ is the 15-Minute City? Evaluating the Role of Technology in Advancing Accessibility, Mobility, and Well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Margarida Madaleno & Max Nathan & Henry Overman & Sevrin Waights, 2018. "Incubators, accelerators and regional economic development," CEP Discussion Papers dp1575, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    13. Carolina Sarmiento, 2022. "Not diverse enough? Displacement, diversity discourse, and commercial gentrification in Santa Ana, California, a majority-Mexican city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(9), pages 1782-1799, July.
    14. Arslan, Okan & Laporte, Gilbert, 2025. "The 15-minute city concept: An operations research perspective and a research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    15. Myfanwy Taylor, 2020. "The Role of Traders and Small Businesses in Urban Social Movements: The Case of London's Workspace Struggles," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1041-1056, November.
    16. Janet Merkel, 2024. "Spatial Politics of Cultural Production: Negotiating Workspaces and Resisting Displacement at Industrial Heritage Sites in Berlin," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
    17. Alessia Iannillo & Isidoro Fasolino, 2021. "Land-Use Mix and Urban Sustainability: Benefits and Indicators Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Forouhar, Navid & Forouhar, Amir & Hasankhani, Mahnoosh, 2022. "Commercial gentrification and neighbourhood change: A dynamic view on local residents' quality of life in Tehran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    19. Dan Zhao & Kewei Liu & Jianwei Li & Jiagang Zhai, 2025. "Spatial Reconstruction and Determinants of Industrial Land in China’s Urban Expansion: A Theoretical Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    20. Jane Clossick & Mark Brearley, 2023. "Auditing, Revealing and Promoting Industry in the London Borough of Southwark," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 211-224.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:10273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.