IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p213-d1572799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Reconstruction and Determinants of Industrial Land in China’s Urban Expansion: A Theoretical Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Zhao

    (College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Kewei Liu

    (College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Jianwei Li

    (College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Jiagang Zhai

    (College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

Abstract

The evolution of industrial land layout is a significant feature of changes in urban land use types during rapid urbanization. However, the theoretical studies investigating the evolution mechanism behind industrial land are scarce. This study developed a dynamic theoretical framework examining the relationship between government and market forces. Furthermore, this study examined the determinants of industrial land evolution in Xi’an from 1994 to 2019 by using a logistic regression model. The results showed that industrial land area increased from 55.02 km 2 to 126.63 km 2 from 1994 to 2013 but later rapidly reduced to 106.61 km 2 in 2019. The spatial distribution of industrial land exhibited significant deindustrialization and suburbanization during park-orientated agglomeration and showed a shift from large-area small-patch to multi-center large-patch agglomeration. Factors such as development zone policies, land prices, agglomeration benefits, land supply, and transportation infrastructure are key determinants of suburbanization, while land prices and agglomeration benefits are key determinants of deindustrialization. This study reveals the mechanisms driving industrial land evolution and offers guidance in improving the rationality of urban land layout and achieving industry–city integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Zhao & Kewei Liu & Jianwei Li & Jiagang Zhai, 2025. "Spatial Reconstruction and Determinants of Industrial Land in China’s Urban Expansion: A Theoretical Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:213-:d:1572799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/213/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/213/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica Ferm & Dimitrios Panayotopoulos-Tsiros & Sam Griffiths, 2021. "Planning Urban Manufacturing, Industrial Building Typologies, and Built Environments: Lessons From Inner London," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 350-367.
    2. Allen J. Scott, 1982. "Locational Patterns and Dynamics of Industrial Activity in the Modern Metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 111-141, May.
    3. Vu, Khuong & Haraguchi, Nobuya & Amann, Juergen, 2021. "Deindustrialization in developed countries amid accelerated globalization: Patterns, influencers, and policy insights," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 454-469.
    4. Peter Gripaios, 1977. "Industrial Decline in London: An Examination of its Causes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 181-189, June.
    5. Jessica Ferm & Edward Jones, 2016. "Mixed-use ‘regeneration’ of employment land in the post-industrial city: challenges and realities in London," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1913-1936, October.
    6. Keqiang Wang & Guoxiang Li & Hongmei Liu, 2020. "Location choice of industrial land reduction in Metropolitan Area: Evidence from Shanghai in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 1837-1859, December.
    7. Xinguo Yuan & Xingping Wang & Yingyu Wang & Juan Li & Yang Zhang & Zhan Gao & Gai Zhang, 2024. "Commuting Pattern Recognition of Industrial Parks Using Mobile Phone Signaling Data: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Paul K. Asabere & Forrest E. Huffman, 1991. "Zoning and Industrial Land Values: The Case of Philadelphia," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 154-160, June.
    9. Robert A. Will, 1964. "Federal Influences on Industrial Location: How Extensive?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 40(1), pages 49-57.
    10. Jeong-Il Park & Nancey Green Leigh, 2017. "Urban Industrial Land Loss and Foreign Direct Investment-Related Manufacturing Job Sprawl: An Atlanta, Georgia MSA Case Study," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 95-113, October.
    11. Xiaoyi Chen & Hengwei Wang, 2024. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Industrial Land Marketization in Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Zhou & Shan Yang & Shuguang Wang & Liyang Xiong, 2017. "Ownership reform and the changing manufacturing landscape in Chinese cities: The case of Wuxi," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Jessica Ferm & Edward Jones, 2017. "Beyond the post-industrial city: Valuing and planning for industry in London," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(14), pages 3380-3398, November.
    3. Thomas A. Hutton, 2009. "Trajectories of the New Economy: Regeneration and Dislocation in the Inner City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(5-6), pages 987-1001, May.
    4. Jianglin Lu & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2022. "Residents’ Selection Behavior of Compensation Schemes for Construction Land Reduction: Empirical Evidence from Questionnaires in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Andrew Cumbers, 2014. "Advancing theory in urban research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(5), pages 865-867, April.
    6. Bo Liu & Desheng Xue & Yiming Tan, 2019. "Deciphering the Manufacturing Production Space in Global City-Regions of Developing Countries—a Case of Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Peter F. Colwell & Tim F. Scheu, 1994. "A History of Site Valuation Rules: Functions and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 9(3), pages 353-368.
    8. Nagao, Kenkichi & Edgington, David W., 2023. "Local industrial displacement, zoning conflicts and monozukuri planning in Higashi Osaka, Japan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Gordon F. Mulligan, 1984. "Agglomeration and Central Place Theory: A Review of the Literature," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 1-42, September.
    10. Jianglin Lu & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2023. "Land Development Rights, Spatial Injustice, and the Economic Development in Net-Incremental Reduction Regions of Construction Land: Evidence from Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Francis, Bill B. & Hasan, Iftekhar & John, Kose & Waisman, Maya, 2016. "Urban Agglomeration and CEO Compensation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(6), pages 1925-1953, December.
    12. repec:dgr:rugsom:02d31 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Margarida Madaleno & Max Nathan & Henry Overman & Sevrin Waights, 2018. "Incubators, accelerators and regional economic development," CEP Discussion Papers dp1575, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Janet Merkel, 2024. "Spatial Politics of Cultural Production: Negotiating Workspaces and Resisting Displacement at Industrial Heritage Sites in Berlin," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
    15. Carol Ludwig & Seraphim Alvanides, 2023. "A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of the Urban Fabric of Nuremberg From the 1940s Onwards Using Historical Maps," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 239-254.
    16. Eli Beracha & William G. Hardin & Hilla Maaria Skiba, 2018. "Real Estate Market Segmentation: Hotels as Exemplar," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 252-273, February.
    17. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2012_017 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. S Krakover, 1987. "Cluster of Cities versus City Region in Regional Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 19(10), pages 1375-1386, October.
    19. Paul R. Blackley & David Greytak, 1986. "Comparative Advantage and Industrial Location: An Intrametropolitan Evaluation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 221-230, June.
    20. Allen Scott, 2008. "Production and work in the American metropolis: a macroscopic approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(4), pages 787-805, December.
    21. Peter Elias & Geoffrey Keogh, 1982. "Industrial Decline and Unemployment in the Inner City Areas of Great Britain: a Review of the Evidence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 1-15, February.
    22. David Keeble & Peter Tyler, 1995. "Enterprising Behaviour and the Urban-Rural Shift," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(6), pages 975-997, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:213-:d:1572799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.