IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v9y2021i3p361-371.html

The New European Political Arithmetic of Inequalities in Education: A History of the Present

Author

Listed:
  • Romuald Normand

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Strasbourg, France)

Abstract

The article describes the emergence and development of positive epistemology and quantification tools in the dynamics of inequalities in education. It contributes to a history of the present at a time when datafication and experimentalism are reappearing in educational policies to justify the reduction of inequalities across international surveys and randomised controlled trials. This socio‐history of metrics also sheds light on transformations about relationships historically established between the welfare state and education that have shaped the representation of inequalities and social programs in education. The use of large‐scale surveys and controlled experiments in social and educational policies developed in the 1920s and 30s, even if their methods and techniques have become more sophisticated due to statistical progress. However, statistical reasoning is today no less persuasive in justifying the measurement of student skills and various forms of state intervention for “at‐risk” children and youth. With the rise of international organisations, notably the European Commission, demographic issues related to school population and the reduction of inequalities have shifted. It is less a question of selecting the most talented or gifted among working‐class students than of investing in human capital from early childhood to improve the education systems’ performance and competitiveness for the lifelong learning economy and European social investment strategy. This article attempts to illustrate this new arithmetic of inequalities in education at the European level.

Suggested Citation

  • Romuald Normand, 2021. "The New European Political Arithmetic of Inequalities in Education: A History of the Present," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 361-371.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v9:y:2021:i:3:p:361-371
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v9i3.4339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4339
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v9i3.4339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:ecpoli:v:26:y:2011:i:67:p:427-491 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Eric A. Hanushek & Ludger Woessmann, 2011. "How much do educational outcomes matter in OECD countries? [‘Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston’s charters and pilots’]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 26(67), pages 427-491.
    3. Michel Callon, 2010. "Performativity, Misfires And Politics," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 163-169, July.
    4. Martin Bulmer, 1983. "The methodology of early social indicator research: William Fielding Ogburn and ‘Recent social trends’, 1933," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 109-130, August.
    5. Fabian Muniesa, 2014. "The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn," Post-Print halshs-00989576, HAL.
    6. David H. Greenberg & Philip K. Robins, 1986. "The changing role of social experiments in policy analysis," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(2), pages 340-362.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Romuald Normand, 2021. "The New European Political Arithmetic of Inequalities in Education: A History of the Present," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 361-371.
    2. Loconto, Allison & Rajão, Raoni, 2020. "Governing by models: Exploring the technopolitics of the (in)visilibities of land," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Millo, Yuval & Spence, Crawford & Xu, Ruowen, 2024. "Algorithmic self-referentiality: How machine learning pushes calculative practices to assess themselves," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Boedker, Christina & Chong, Kar-Ming & Mouritsen, Jan, 2020. "The counter-performativity of calculative practices: Mobilising rankings of intellectual capital," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Laetitia Condamin & Valérie-Inès de La Ville, 2023. "Make ethical marketing happen: a performative approach to managers’ identity work in the food industry [Faire advenir un marketing éthique : analyse de la performativité du travail identitaire des managers agro-alimentaires]," Post-Print halshs-04003393, HAL.
    6. Antonopoulou, Katerina & Begkos, Christos, 2020. "Strategizing for digital innovations: Value propositions for transcending market boundaries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Garud, Raghu & Gehman, Joel & Giuliani, Antonio Paco, 2018. "Why not take a performative approach to entrepreneurship?," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 60-64.
    8. Czarniawska, Barbara, 2016. "Performativity of social sciences as seen by an organization scholar," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 315-318.
    9. Benos, Nikos & Zotou, Stefania, 2014. "Education and Economic Growth: A Meta-Regression Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 669-689.
    10. Sam Hampton & Richard Blundel & Aqueel Wahga & Tina Fawcett & Christopher Shaw, 2022. "Transforming small and medium‐sized enterprises to address the climate emergency: The case for values‐based engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1424-1439, September.
    11. Bear, Laura, 2020. "Speculations on infrastructure: from colonial public works to a postcolonial global asset class on the Indian Railways 1840-2017," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103445, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Robson, Keith & Ezzamel, Mahmoud, 2023. "The cultural fields of accounting practices: Institutionalization and accounting changes beyond the organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Berthomé, Guy-El-Karim & Thomas, Alban, 2017. "A Context-based Procedure for Assessing Participatory Schemes in Environmental Planning," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 113-123.
    14. Dahlum, Sirianne & Knutsen, Carl Henrik, 2017. "Do Democracies Provide Better Education? Revisiting the Democracy–Human Capital Link," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 186-199.
    15. McFall, Liz, 2015. "Is digital disruption the end of health insurance? Some thoughts on the devising of risk," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 17(1), pages 32-44.
    16. D. T. Cochrane, 2017. "Economics in the Twenty-First Century: A Critical Perspective, by Robert Chernomas and Ian Hudson," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 408-410, July.
    17. Benjamin Braun, 2016. "From performativity to political economy: index investing, ETFs and asset manager capitalism," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 257-273, May.
    18. Andrea Pollio, 2020. "Architectures of millennial development: Entrepreneurship and spatial justice at the bottom of the pyramid in Cape Town," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 573-592, May.
    19. Liyanage Devangi H. Perera, & Eduard J. Bomhoff & Grace H.Y. Lee, 2014. "Parents' attitudes towards science and their children's science achievement," Monash Economics Working Papers 02-14, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    20. Constantinides, Panos & Slavova, Mira, 2020. "From a monopoly to an entrepreneurial field: The constitution of possibilities in South African energy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(6).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v9:y:2021:i:3:p:361-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.