IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v14y2026a10866.html

Digital Tactics of Refugee Women: Towards an Inclusive Framework for Digital Literacies

Author

Listed:
  • Amber I Bartlett

    (Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, The Netherlands)

  • Noemi Mena Montes

    (Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, The Netherlands)

  • Lieke Verheijen

    (Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, The Netherlands)

  • Koen Leurs

    (Department of Media and Culture Studies, Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

  • Mirjam Broersma

    (Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This article examines the complex relationship between online and offline inequalities for shaping refugee women’s experiences during resettlement. Refugee women have unique challenges during resettlement, yet the role of gender in shaping refugees’ experiences of inclusion, exclusion, and associated risks is often overlooked. Research into the role of digital technologies in refugees’ resettlement is fragmented, spread across disciplines, and therefore lacks analytical focus. Motivated by a research field that is fragmented and lacks a gender analysis, we conducted a scoping review to (a) consolidate studies across disciplines on refugee women’s digital practices during resettlement and (b) propose tactics as an analytical approach to the study of the relationship between online and offline inequalities. Through the analytical framework of tactics, we review three thematic areas of the outcomes of digital technology use for refugees: social connectedness, access to information, and self‐presentation. We find that outcomes of refugee women’s ICT use are heavily shaped by gendered norms, expectations, and structural exclusion, and there is a strong need for a better understanding of the role of digital technologies in the lives of refugee women. This study has also demonstrated the use of tactics as an important analytical tool in pluralising understandings of digital literacies as a practice, and that tactics have a strong gendered component. Using tactics as an analytic tool illuminated that, while offline inequalities can inform outcomes of digital technology use, the same inequalities can shape the reappropriation of digital platforms to mitigate the risk of the practices, while gaining access to the outcomes. This study demonstrates that tactics offer a valuable conceptual framework to foreground refugee women’s situated agency in digitally mediated contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber I Bartlett & Noemi Mena Montes & Lieke Verheijen & Koen Leurs & Mirjam Broersma, 2026. "Digital Tactics of Refugee Women: Towards an Inclusive Framework for Digital Literacies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:10866
    DOI: 10.17645/si.10866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/10866
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.10866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lythreatis, Sophie & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser, 2022. "The digital divide: A review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ponzoa, José M. & Gómez, Andrés & Mas, José M., 2023. "EU27 and USA institutions in the digital ecosystem: Proposal for a digital presence measurement index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Roger Enriquez & David Han & Richard Harris & Christopher Reddick, 2025. "Exploring digital access and digital engagement of senior small business owners," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 3631-3647, August.
    3. Radtke, Jörg, 2025. "E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's Energiewende," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    4. P. M. Vik & D. Kamerāde & K. T. Dayson, 2024. "The Link Between Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion—Evidence from Consumers Survey Data from Low-Income Areas," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 373-393, September.
    5. Brouthers, Keith D. & Ascencio, Christine & Benmamoun, Mamoun & Alhorr, Hadi, 2025. "Digital standardization vs. adaptation: Mitigating the liability of outsidership – A literature review," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5).
    6. Zhang, Zhenhua & Wu, Huangbin & Zhang, Yunpeng & Hu, Shilei & Pan, Yuxi & Feng, Yanchao, 2024. "Does digital global value chain participation reduce energy resilience? Evidence from 49 countries worldwide," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    7. Enrico Battisti & Hussain G. Rammal & Hemant Merchant & Pervez Ghauri & Niccolò Nirino, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility Challenges of International Service Firms: An Introduction and Research Agenda," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 399-414, June.
    8. Sören Petermann, 2024. "Preference for internet at home in a disadvantaged neighbourhood," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(16), pages 3129-3144, December.
    9. Cai, Guowei & Yao, Tao & Wang, Xun, 2025. "Market accessibility and poverty alleviation: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Bin Xiong & Baocheng Yu, 2024. "The Impact of Internet Development on Youth’s Job Quality in the Digital Economy Era: Transmission Mechanism and Empirical Test," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 269-294, October.
    11. Ueno, Akiko & Dennis, Charles & Dafoulas, Georgios A., 2023. "Digital exclusion and relative digital deprivation: Exploring factors and moderators of internet non-use in the UK," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Christina Sanchita Shah & Satish Krishnan, 2025. "Digital Gender Gap, Gender Equality and National Institutional Freedom: A Dynamic Panel Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 605-634, April.
    13. Jingru Xiang & Congying Zhang, 2025. "Decoding the “Digital Code” of Happiness: Elaboration Based on Absolute Income and Relative Income," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 1025-1052, July.
    14. Gijón, Covadonga & Fernández-Bonilla, Fernando & Ruíz-Rúa, Aurora, 2025. "Different approaches to Spanish e-government: From use to impact," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    15. Martins, Maria Lurdes, 2023. "Cybersecurity provision and online services access and usage," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 278001, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    16. Ranasinghe, Thilini & Grosse, Eric H. & Glock, Christoph H. & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2024. "Never too late to learn: Unlocking the potential of aging workforce in manufacturing and service industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    17. Li, Boyang & Du, Yuqin & Chen, Guijing, 2025. "Dynamic nexus between urban digitization and pollutant discharge: RBC theory and empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    18. Hayet Kerras & María Francisca Rosique Contreras & Susana Bautista & María Dolores de-Miguel Gómez, 2022. "Is the Rural Population Caught in the Whirlwind of the Digital Divide?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, November.
    19. Adina Cocu & Emilia Pecheanu & Ioan Susnea & Sandra Dingli & Adrian Istrate & Cornelia Tudorie, 2025. "Technology-Enabled Learning for Green and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Education," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, February.
    20. Ren, Wei & Zhu, Xiaowen, 2024. "The age-based digital divides in China: Trends and socioeconomic differentials (2010–2020)," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:10866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.