IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v34y2025i5s0969593125001003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital standardization vs. adaptation: Mitigating the liability of outsidership – A literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Brouthers, Keith D.
  • Ascencio, Christine
  • Benmamoun, Mamoun
  • Alhorr, Hadi

Abstract

Traditionally, firms expanding internationally must decide on when to modify their business model by either standardizing or adapting their products, price, promotion, and distribution activities to overcome the liability of foreignness (LOF). However, firms that pursue internationalization through internet-based digital ventures—such as websites, mobile applications, social media, and online platforms—encounter distinct entry barriers that give rise to a liability of outsidership (LOO). We contribute to this literature by proposing a conceptual framework and theoretical perspective that explains how the degree of business model standardization or adaptation can influence the extent to which firms can reduce both LOF and LOO in digital internationalization. We then conduct a systematic literature review of existing research on digital standardization and adaptation, highlighting current findings and identifying key gaps in the field. Our review of 49 relevant studies reveals that much of the existing research is fragmented, often lacks a unifying theoretical foundation, and primarily focuses on website and promotional adaptation, largely neglecting other critical business model components and the broader set of digital-specific entry barriers. Drawing on our theory and literature review we develop recommendations to guide future research and advance our understanding of this important issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Brouthers, Keith D. & Ascencio, Christine & Benmamoun, Mamoun & Alhorr, Hadi, 2025. "Digital standardization vs. adaptation: Mitigating the liability of outsidership – A literature review," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:34:y:2025:i:5:s0969593125001003
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125001003
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:34:y:2025:i:5:s0969593125001003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.