IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v13y2025a9998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical Implications of AI‐Driven Chatbots in Domestic Violence Support

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna Mielismäki

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland)

  • Marita Husso

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland)

Abstract

Our study explored the opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations of using artificial intelligence (AI)‐driven chatbots in domestic violence (DV) support. DV is a serious public health and social problem. Identifying it as early as possible is important in violence prevention. However, victim‐survivors of DV are often reluctant to disclose violence, and service practitioners may lack the capacity or confidence to address violence‐related issues. To tackle these challenges, the use of AI‐driven chatbots presents opportunities to address DV by providing information and guiding users to appropriate services. However, interactions between humans and AI systems lie at the intersection of the human need for practical assistance and the risks inherent in digital communication—raising ethical considerations, particularly in the vulnerable context of DV. Semi‐structured interviews with 25 victim‐survivors, DV professionals, and criminal justice experts suggest that while the implementation of AI‐driven chatbots can greatly enhance access to information, it also poses significant challenges related to safety and accountability. This is because interactions with chatbots lack essential elements for comprehensive situational assessment and documentation of DV cases, and for the establishment of a support network. These insights underscore the critical role of human interaction in addressing DV cases, while also highlighting the potential roles of chatbots as intermediate support systems for victim‐survivors and as supplementary tools for welfare service practitioners in identifying different forms of DV and supporting the appropriate referral of cases. This study advances understanding of how AI‐driven chatbots can be ethically and sustainably implemented in DV support systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Mielismäki & Marita Husso, 2025. "Ethical Implications of AI‐Driven Chatbots in Domestic Violence Support," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:9998
    DOI: 10.17645/si.9998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/9998
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.9998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiara Longoni & Andrea Bonezzi & Carey K Morewedge, 2019. "Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 629-650.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Changdong, 2024. "How consumers respond to service failures caused by algorithmic mistakes: The role of algorithmic interpretability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2022. "Designing AI‐augmented healthcare delivery systems for physician buy‐in and patient acceptance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4443-4451, December.
    3. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    4. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    5. Tse, Tiffany Tsz Kwan & Hanaki, Nobuyuki & Mao, Bolin, 2024. "Beware the performance of an algorithm before relying on it: Evidence from a stock price forecasting experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Yuexian Zhang & XueYing Wang & Xin Zhao, 2025. "Supervising or assisting? The influence of virtual anchor driven by AI–human collaboration on customer engagement in live streaming e-commerce," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3047-3070, August.
    7. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. De Bruyn, Arnaud & Viswanathan, Vijay & Beh, Yean Shan & Brock, Jürgen Kai-Uwe & von Wangenheim, Florian, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence and Marketing: Pitfalls and Opportunities," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 91-105.
    9. Zhao, Taiyang & Ran, Yaxuan & Wu, Banggang & Lynette Wang, Valerie & Zhou, Liying & Lu Wang, Cheng, 2024. "Virtual versus human: Unraveling consumer reactions to service failures through influencer types," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Fan, Xiaoming, 2024. "Fintech platforms and information service quality from the perspective of investor cognition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Ekaterina Jussupow & Kai Spohrer & Armin Heinzl & Joshua Gawlitza, 2021. "Augmenting Medical Diagnosis Decisions? An Investigation into Physicians’ Decision-Making Process with Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 713-735, September.
    12. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:449-451 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Wang, Xun & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez & Demir, Emrah & Sarkis, Joseph, 2024. "Algorithm aversion during disruptions: The case of safety stock," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    14. Felix Holzmeister & Martin Holmén & Michael Kirchler & Matthias Stefan & Erik Wengström, 2023. "Delegation Decisions in Finance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(8), pages 4828-4844, August.
    15. Poushneh, Atieh & Vasquez-Parraga, Arturo & Gearhart, Richard S., 2024. "The effect of empathetic response and consumers’ narcissism in voice-based artificial intelligence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    16. Kim, Jeong Hyun & Kim, Jungkeun & Baek, Tae Hyun & Kim, Changju, 2025. "ChatGPT personalized and humorous recommendations," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    17. Chen, Yaqi & Wang, Haizhong & Rao Hill, Sally & Li, Binglian, 2024. "Consumer attitudes toward AI-generated ads: Appeal types, self-efficacy and AI’s social role," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    18. Chiara Longoni & Andrea Bonezzi & Carey K. Morewedge, 2020. "Resistance to medical artificial intelligence is an attribute in a compensatory decision process: response to Pezzo and Becksted (2020)," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(3), pages 446-448, May.
    19. Yang, Yikai & Zheng, Jiehui & Yu, Yining & Qiu, Yiling & Wang, Lei, 2024. "The role of recommendation sources and attribute framing in online product recommendations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Brüns, Jasper David & Meißner, Martin, 2024. "Do you create your content yourself? Using generative artificial intelligence for social media content creation diminishes perceived brand authenticity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    21. Weiguang Wang & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ritu Agarwal, 2024. "Friend or Foe? Teaming Between Artificial Intelligence and Workers with Variation in Experience," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 5753-5775, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:9998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.