IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v6y2018i3p190-204.html

Healthcare Reform Repeal Efforts in the United States in 2017: An Inquiry into Public Advocacy Efforts by Key Interest Groups

Author

Listed:
  • John Hoornbeek

    (Center for Public Policy and Health, College of Public Health, Kent State University, USA)

  • Bethany Lanese

    (College of Public Health, Kent State University, USA)

  • Mutlaq Albugmi

    (Center for Public Policy and Health, College of Public Health, Kent State University, USA)

  • Joshua Filla

    (Center for Public Policy and Health, College of Public Health, Kent State University, USA)

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was subjected to repeated repeal and replace efforts in the United States Congress in 2017. Attempts to repeal and replace the law failed, but penalties for not complying with its mandate that individuals purchase health insurance were removed in tax legislation passed late in the year and administrative actions taken by President Trump yielded additional concerns about the stability of the law’s reform approach and the expanded health insurance access that it created. This article explores public advocacy efforts by key interest groups from three major policy sectors—health providers, the insurance industry, and the business community—that had served as an “axis of opposition” to past American healthcare reform efforts. It identifies resource and incentive policy feedback effects that appear likely to influence these groups due to design features of the ACA and assesses whether patterns of advocacy efforts in 2017 are consistent with what might be expected if these design features had their predicted effects. Our assessment reveals patterns of interest group advocacy that are consistent with what might be expected to arise from resource and incentive based policy feedback effects, and interest group political dynamics that differ from what was in place prior to passage of the ACA. It also reveals advocacy patterns that are not well explained by resource and incentive based policy feedback effects, and—in so doing—yields insights that are relevant to the design of policy reforms and future research.

Suggested Citation

  • John Hoornbeek & Bethany Lanese & Mutlaq Albugmi & Joshua Filla, 2018. "Healthcare Reform Repeal Efforts in the United States in 2017: An Inquiry into Public Advocacy Efforts by Key Interest Groups," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 190-204.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v6:y:2018:i:3:p:190-204
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i3.1507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1507
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacobs, Lawrence & Skocpol, Theda, 2010. "Health Care Reform and American Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199769117.
    2. Jacobs, Lawrence & Skocpol, Theda, 2010. "Health Care Reform and American Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199769124.
    3. Pierson, Paul, 2000. "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 94(2), pages 251-267, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Hoornbeek & Bethany Lanese & Mutlaq Albugmi & Joshua Filla, 2018. "Healthcare Reform Repeal Efforts in the United States in 2017: An Inquiry into Public Advocacy Efforts by Key Interest Groups," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 190-204.
    2. Daniel Béland & Michael Howlett & Philip Rocco & Alex Waddan, 2020. "Designing policy resilience: lessons from the Affordable Care Act," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 269-289, June.
    3. Mewes, Jan & Giordano, Giuseppe Nicola, 2017. "Self-rated health, generalized trust, and the Affordable Care Act: A US panel study, 2006–2014," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 48-56.
    4. Steffi Heinecke, 2016. "The Gradual Transformation of the Polish Public Science System," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Eloy Solis & Kayvan Karimi & Irene Garcia & Inmaculada Mohino, 2022. "Knowledge Economy Clustering at the Intrametropolitan Level: Evidence from Madrid," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1268-1299, June.
    6. Fu, Tong & Jian, Ze, 2020. "A developmental state: How to allocate electricity efficiently in a developing country," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2b86iahfka8nib85jevjn10bsn is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Kjerstin Kjøndal, 2020. "Nordic Cooperation in the Nuclear Safety Sector: High, Low, or Differentiated Integration?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 33-43.
    9. Bischi, Gian Italo & Merlone, Ugo & Pruscini, Eros, 2018. "Evolutionary dynamics in club goods binary games," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 104-119.
    10. Thomas Brenner & Sonja Jeddeloh, 2024. "Path dependence in an evolving system: a modeling perspective," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 18(1), pages 1-36, January.
    11. Hagen, Johannes, 2013. "A History of the Swedish Pension System," Working Paper Series, Center for Fiscal Studies 2013:7, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    12. Andrea Leiter & Engelbert Theurl, 2012. "The convergence of health care financing structures: empirical evidence from OECD-countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(1), pages 7-18, February.
    13. Hanan Haber, 2020. "The Political Economy of Regulating for Welfare: Regulation Preventing Loss of Access to Basic Services in the UK, Sweden, the EU, and Israel," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 691(1), pages 50-67, September.
    14. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    15. Yang, Ju-Ying, 2025. "Pathways to a sustainable energy future: A comparative case study of four Texas municipalities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    16. Gerschewski, Johannes, 2021. "Explanations of Institutional Change: Reflecting on a “Missing Diagonal”," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 115(1), pages 218-233.
    17. Blom, Tannelie & Radulova, Elissaveta & Arnold, Christine, 2008. "Theorizing Modes of Governance in the EU: Institutional Design and Informational Complexity," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 4, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.
    18. David P Carter & Christopher M Weible & Saba N Siddiki & Xavier Basurto, 2016. "Integrating core concepts from the institutional analysis and development framework for the systematic analysis of policy designs: An illustration from the US National Organic Program regulation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 28(1), pages 159-185, January.
    19. Eichhorst, Werner & Kaiser, Lutz C., 2006. "The German Labor Market: Still Adjusting Badly?," IZA Discussion Papers 2215, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Rodrigo Alves Rolo & Kristof Van Assche & Martijn Duineveld, 2021. "Strategy and Steering in Governance: The Changing Fates of the Argentine Planning Council," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 415-427.
    21. Falkner, Gerda & Hartlapp, Miriam & Leiber, Simone & Treib, Oliver, 2002. "Transforming social policy in Europe? The EC's parental leave directive and misfit in the 15 member states," MPIfG Working Paper 02/11, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v6:y:2018:i:3:p:190-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.