IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v8y2020i2p16-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-National Similarities and Differences between Legacy and Digital-Born News Media Audiences

Author

Listed:
  • Alfonso Vara-Miguel

    (Department of Marketing and Media Management, School of Communication, University of Navarra, Spain)

Abstract

The decline of the news business model for print newspapers in many Western countries and the digital disruption caused by the Internet have influenced the rise of digital-born news media. These new media are different from legacy brands in terms of business models, distribution strategies, corporate organisation, and editorial priorities. It would be expected that the different nature of both legacy and digital-born news media has driven to two types of significantly different audiences. This article aims to analyse whether there are significant differences between the users of these two types of media, by comparing the online audiences of five European countries’ (United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, and Italy) legacy and digital-born media brands in 2015 and 2019. The article will focus on four aspects: demographic and socioeconomics profiles (sex, age, income and level of education); interest in news; payment for online news; and media trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfonso Vara-Miguel, 2020. "Cross-National Similarities and Differences between Legacy and Digital-Born News Media Audiences," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 16-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:2:p:16-27
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i2.2733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2733
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiou, Lesley & Tucker, Catherine, 2013. "Paywalls and the demand for news," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 61-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie L. Chan, 2021. "The Social Value of Public Information When Not Everyone is Privately Informed," Working Papers 2021-09-18, Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Xiamen University.
    2. Inyoung Chae & Jihyeon Ha & David A. Schweidel, 2023. "Paywall Suspensions and Digital News Subscriptions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 729-745, July.
    3. Steen, Frode, 2019. "Paywalls and the demand for online news," CEPR Discussion Papers 13651, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Ben Shiller & Joel Waldfogel & Johnny Ryan, 2017. "Will Ad Blocking Break the Internet?," NBER Working Papers 23058, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Stefano Castriota & Marco Delmastro & Mirco Tonin, 2023. "National or local infodemic? The demand for news in Italy during COVID-19," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 507-536, December.
    6. Chutian Wang & Bo Zhou & Yogesh V. Joshi, 2024. "Endogenous Consumption and Metered Paywalls," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 158-177, January.
    7. Charles Angelucci & Julia Cagé, 2019. "Newspapers in Times of Low Advertising Revenues," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 319-364, August.
    8. Monsalve-Alamá, Antonio & Ortigosa-Blanch, Arturo & Sánchez-García, Javier, 2023. "The evolution of the media discourse on the implementation of media companies' new digital business models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Alessandra Casarico & Mirco Tonin, 2018. "Pay-What-You-Want to Support Independent Information - A Field Experiment on Motivation," CESifo Working Paper Series 6939, CESifo.
    10. Bertin Martens & Luis Aguiar & Estrella Gomez Herrera & Frank Muller, 2018. "The digital transformation of news media and the rise of disinformation and fake news," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2018-02, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Adithya Pattabhiramaiah & Eric Overby & Lizhen Xu, 2022. "Spillovers from Online Engagement: How a Newspaper Subscriber’s Activation of Digital Paywall Access Affects Her Retention and Subscription Revenue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3528-3548, May.
    12. Anderson, Simon & Waldfogel, Joel, 2015. "Preference Externalities in Media Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 10835, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Julian Runge, & Stefan Wagner & Jörg Claussen & Daniel Klapper, 2016. "Freemium pricing: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-16-06, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    14. Robert Rußell & Benedikt Berger & Lucas Stich & Thomas Hess & Martin Spann, 2020. "Monetizing Online Content: Digital Paywall Design and Configuration," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(3), pages 253-260, June.
    15. Alfonso Vara-Miguel, 2020. "Cross-National Similarities and Differences between Legacy and Digital-Born News Media Audiences," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 16-27.
    16. Abdallah Salami & Robert Seamans, 2014. "The Effect of the Internet on Newspaper Readability," Working Papers 14-13, NET Institute.
    17. Xiaojie Sun, 2023. "Strategy analysis for a digital content platform considering perishability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 415-439, January.
    18. Anja Lambrecht & Avi Goldfarb & Alessandro Bonatti & Anindya Ghose & Daniel Goldstein & Randall Lewis & Anita Rao & Navdeep Sahni & Song Yao, 2014. "How do firms make money selling digital goods online?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 331-341, September.
    19. Anja Lambrecht & Kanishka Misra, 2017. "Fee or Free: When Should Firms Charge for Online Content?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 1150-1165, April.
    20. Casarico, Alessandra & Tonin, Mirco, 2021. "A field experiment on fundraising to support independent information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 227-250.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:2:p:16-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.