IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v7y2019i2p100-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Literacy Through Digital Citizenship: Online Civic Participation and Public Opinion Evaluation of Youth Minorities in Southeast Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Audrey Yue

    (Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore)

  • Elmie Nekmat

    (Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore)

  • Annisa R. Beta

    (Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore)

Abstract

The field of critical digital literacy studies has burgeoned in recent years as a result of the increased cultural consumption of digital media as well as the turn to the production of digital media forms. This article extends extant digital literacy studies by focusing on its subfield of digital citizenship. Proposing that digital citizenship is not another dimension or axis of citizenship, but a practice through which civic activities in the various dimensions of citizenship are conducted, this article critically considers how the concept of digital citizenship can furnish further insight into the quality of online civic participation that results in claims to and acts of citizenship. Through interdisciplinary scholarship, drawing from critical media and cultural theory, and media psychology, and deriving new empirical data from qualitative digital ethnography and quantitative focus group and survey studies, it presents original case studies with young people in Southeast Asia, including young Muslim women’s groups in Indonesia and youth public opinion on LGBTs in Singapore. It argues that Southeast Asian youth digital citizenship foregrounds civic participation as emergent acts that not only serve to make society a better place, but also enacts alternative publics that characterise new modes of civic-making in more conservative, collectivistic Southeast Asian societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Audrey Yue & Elmie Nekmat & Annisa R. Beta, 2019. "Digital Literacy Through Digital Citizenship: Online Civic Participation and Public Opinion Evaluation of Youth Minorities in Southeast Asia," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 100-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:100-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1899
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Couldry & Hilde Stephansen & Aristea Fotopoulou & Richard Macdonald & Wilma Clark & Luke Dickens, 2014. "Digital citizenship? Narrative exchange and the changing terms of civic culture," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 54411, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Stephen Coleman, 2006. "Digital voices and analogue citizenship Bridging the gap between young people and the democratic process," Public Policy Review, Institute for Public Policy Research, vol. 13(4), pages 257-261, December.
    3. Duncan J. Watts & Peter Sheridan Dodds, 2007. "Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 441-458, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hiller A. Spires, 2019. "Critical Perspectives on Digital Literacies: Creating a Path Forward," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 1-3.
    2. Shuangying Chen & Qiyue Li & Bo Lei & Na Wang, 2021. "Configurational Analysis of the Driving Paths of Chinese Digital Economy Based on the Technology–Organization–Environment Framework," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    3. Ruwini Prasadini Dharmawardene, 2023. "Enhancing Communicative Competencies and Media Literacy in Sri Lankan University System," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(2), pages 1013-1020, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvio Vismara, 2018. "Information Cascades among Investors in Equity Crowdfunding," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(3), pages 467-497, May.
    2. Inyoung Chae & Andrew T. Stephen & Yakov Bart & Dai Yao, 2017. "Spillover Effects in Seeded Word-of-Mouth Marketing Campaigns," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 89-104, January.
    3. Peres, Renana & Muller, Eitan & Mahajan, Vijay, 2010. "Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 91-106.
    4. Vincent Labatut & Jean-Michel Balasque, 2010. "Business-oriented Analysis of a Social Network of University Students," Post-Print hal-00633643, HAL.
    5. Antoine Loeper & Jakub Steiner & Colin Stewart, 2014. "Influential Opinion Leaders," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 124(581), pages 1147-1167, December.
    6. Kreindler, Gabriel E. & Young, H. Peyton, 2013. "Fast convergence in evolutionary equilibrium selection," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 39-67.
    7. Juan Shi & Kin Keung Lai & Ping Hu & Gang Chen, 2018. "Factors dominating individual information disseminating behavior on social networking sites," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 121-139, June.
    8. Natalia Levina & Manuel Arriaga, 2014. "Distinction and Status Production on User-Generated Content Platforms: Using Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Production to Understand Social Dynamics in Online Fields," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 468-488, September.
    9. Michael Foley & Rory Smead & Patrick Forber & Christoph Riedl, 2021. "Avoiding the bullies: The resilience of cooperation among unequals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Trischler, Jakob & Johnson, Mikael & Kristensson, Per, 2020. "A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 552-560.
    11. Xuzhen Zhu & Jinming Ma & Xin Su & Hui Tian & Wei Wang & Shimin Cai, 2019. "Information Spreading on Weighted Multiplex Social Network," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, November.
    12. Andrea Pérez & Carlos López & María del Mar García-De los Salmones, 2017. "An empirical exploration of the link between reporting to stakeholders and corporate social responsibility reputation in the Spanish context," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 668-698, March.
    13. Ahmadreza Asgharpourmasouleh & Atiye Sadeghi & Ali Yousofi, 2017. "A Grounded Agent-Based Model of Common Good Production in a Residential Complex: Applying Artificial Experiments," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(4), pages 21582440177, October.
    14. Tolga Akcura & Kemal Altinkemer & Hailiang Chen, 0. "Noninfluentials and information dissemination in the microblogging community," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    15. V. Kumar & Vikram Bhaskaran & Rohan Mirchandani & Milap Shah, 2013. "Practice Prize Winner ---Creating a Measurable Social Media Marketing Strategy: Increasing the Value and ROI of Intangibles and Tangibles for Hokey Pokey," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 194-212, March.
    16. Meyners, Jannik & Barrot, Christian & Becker, Jan U. & Bodapati, Anand V., 2017. "Reward-scrounging in customer referral programs," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 382-398.
    17. Jun Pan & Huizhang Shen & Zhong Chen, 2017. "Based on Agent Model and -Core Decomposition to Analyze the Diffusion of Mass Incident in Microblog," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, December.
    18. Gandal, Neil & Bar-Gill, Sagit, 2017. "Online Exploration, Content Choice & Echo Chambers: An Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 11909, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Sabrina Stöckli & Doris Hofer, 2020. "Susceptibility to social influence predicts behavior on Facebook," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Tavasoli, Ali & Shakeri, Heman & Ardjmand, Ehsan & Young, William A., 2021. "Incentive rate determination in viral marketing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 1169-1187.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:100-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.