IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/journl/y2016i10p151-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between The Diversity Of Employees And Organizational Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Latif Abdul Ridha ATIYAH

    (Craiova University)

Abstract

The current research aims to analyze the diversity of workers and its influence on the organizational performance. The success of an organization is achieved by bringing new creative ideas. Thus, adopting diversity management and diverse workforce inside organization, will create a behavior to add several traits that will enhance the organizational performance by adapting the current work environment to the future work plan. The goal of the research is to identify the impact of diversity in being an independent variant resembled by: (Type, sex, age, religion, ethnicity) and the other one the organizational performance in being a dependent (Related) variant resembled by (market share, sales growth, customer satisfaction, the release cycle of a new product.) The present research reached a number of conclusions, their highlights resembled by the importance of diversity relying on diversity strategy on improving the current products while offering continuous and effective support to the projects of development and research, considering it as the main tool to support the success of effective organizational performance. The results generally confirmed the relation and the expected impact between the effective organization performance and diversity in the researched organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Latif Abdul Ridha ATIYAH, 2016. "The Relationship Between The Diversity Of Employees And Organizational Performance," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 151-163, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:journl:y:2016:i:10:p:151-163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/CMJ2016_I2_9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Turner, Marlene E. & Pratkanis, Anthony R., 1998. "Twenty-Five Years of Groupthink Theory and Research: Lessons from the Evaluation of a Theory," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 73(2-3), pages 105-115, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie Schoss & Diemo Urbig & Malte Brettel & René Mauer, 2022. "Deep-level diversity in entrepreneurial teams and the mediating role of conflicts on team efficacy and satisfaction," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1173-1203, September.
    2. Hillebrand, Bas & Biemans, Wim G., 2003. "The relationship between internal and external cooperation: literature review and propositions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 735-743, September.
    3. Mahbub, Tasmina & Matthews, Kent & Barker, Kate, 2019. "Other people’s money: The profit performance of Bangladeshi family dominated banks," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 103-112.
    4. Mark D Wagy & Josh C Bongard, 2015. "Combining Computational and Social Effort for Collaborative Problem Solving," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Schippers, M.C. & Rus, D.C., 2020. "Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times of COVID-19: Using Reflexivity to Counteract Information-processing Failures," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2020-003-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Joshua Becker & Abdullah Almaatouq & EmH{o}ke-'Agnes Horv'at, 2020. "Network Structures of Collective Intelligence: The Contingent Benefits of Group Discussion," Papers 2009.07202, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    7. Laurence Ball, 2016. "Ben Bernanke And The Zero Bound," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 34(1), pages 7-20, January.
    8. Tamar Kugler & Edgar E. Kausel & Martin G. Kocher, 2012. "Are Groups more Rational than Individuals? A Review of Interactive Decision Making in Groups," CESifo Working Paper Series 3701, CESifo.
    9. Wilson, Matthew & Robson, Karen & Botha, Elsamari, 2017. "Crowdsourcing in a time of empowered stakeholders: Lessons from crowdsourcing campaigns," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 247-253.
    10. Meissner, Philip & Wulf, Torsten, 2017. "The effect of cognitive diversity on the illusion of control bias in strategic decisions: An experimental investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 430-439.
    11. Waldstrøm, Christian, 2003. "Social Capital In Organizations – Beyond Structure And Metaphor," Working Papers 2003-7, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    12. Yaqub, Ohid, 2018. "Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 169-179.
    13. Peter Blunt & Farid Mamundzay & Muqtader Nasary, 2017. "The long and the short of policy pantomime in Afghanistan," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 17(1), pages 67-88, January.
    14. Kindermann, Bastian & Schmidt, Corinna Vera Hedwig & Burger, Oliver & Flatten, Tessa Christina, 2022. "Why teams matter in customer involvement – The moderating effects of team social cohesion and team autonomy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 70-83.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:journl:y:2016:i:10:p:151-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.