IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v72y2019i22p22-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Was erwarten die deutschen Unternehmer von einer Industriepolitik? Industriepolitik 2.020 – quo vadis!?

Author

Listed:
  • Ann-Christin Rathje
  • Ute Hannich

Abstract

Im Zeitraum von April bis Juni 2019 befragte das ifo Institut im Auftrag der Stiftung Familienunternehmen mehr als 1 400 Familien- und Nicht-Familienunternehmen, wie ihrer Ansicht nach die deutsche Industriepolitik ausgestaltet werden sollte. Den Ergebnissen zufolge wird die Schaffung von nationalen Großunternehmen oder Champions, wie im Konzept des deutschen Bundeswirtschaftsministers zur »Nationalen Industriestrategie 2030« vorgesehen, von lediglich 1,3% aller befragten Unternehmen befürwortet. Die horizontale Industriepolitik im Sinne einer breit angelegten Förderung hingegen erhielt im Rahmen der Befragung größeren Zuspruch. Die staatliche Förderung von bestimmten Branchen und Schlüsseltechnologien wurde insbesondere von Nicht-Familienunternehmen und Unternehmen mit mehr als 1 000 Beschäftigten befürwortet.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann-Christin Rathje & Ute Hannich, 2019. "Was erwarten die deutschen Unternehmer von einer Industriepolitik? Industriepolitik 2.020 – quo vadis!?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(22), pages 22-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:72:y:2019:i:22:p:22-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2019-22-rathje-hannich-industriepolitik-2019-11-21_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clemens Fuest & Achim Wambach & Massimo Motta & Martin Peitz & Klaus-Heiner Röhl & Christian Rusche & Sebastian Dullien & Guntram B. Wolff & Dieter Kempf & Andreas Mundt, 2019. "Zäsur in der europäischen Wettbewerbs- und Industriepolitik: Freie Fahrt für europäische Champions?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(08), pages 03-26, April.
    2. Oliver Falck, 2019. "Brauchen wir eine aktive europäische Industriepolitik?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(10), pages 12-15, May.
    3. Philippe Aghion & Peter Howitt, 1997. "Endogenous Growth Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262011662, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johanna Garnitz & Ann-Christin Rathje & Ute Hannich, 2020. "China – Fair Play oder große Konkurrenz?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(02), pages 27-31, February.
    2. Oliver Falck & Anita Wölfl, 2020. "Auf dem Weg zu einer modernen Industriepolitik," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(01), pages 60-63, January.
    3. Wohlrabe, Klaus & Rathje, Ann-Christin & Garnitz, Johanna, 2019. "Wirtschaftspolitik für eine starke EU: Jahresmonitor der Stiftung Familienunternehmen," Studien, Stiftung Familienunternehmen / Foundation for Family Businesses, number 250009.
    4. Pauly, Stefan & Stipanicic, Fernando, 2021. "The creation and diffusion of knowledge: Evidence from the Jet Age," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2112, CEPREMAP.
    5. Dierk Herzer & Philipp Hühne & Peter Nunnenkamp, 2014. "FDI and Income Inequality—Evidence from Latin American Economies," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 778-793, November.
    6. Andrés, Antonio R. & Goel, Rajeev K., 2012. "Does software piracy affect economic growth? Evidence across countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 284-295.
    7. Thierry Laurent, 2012. "Dépenses militaires, croissance et bien être : une simulation de l’impact macroéconomique de la R&D défense," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 122(6), pages 971-1009.
    8. Cristiano Antonelli & Christophe Feder, 2022. "Knowledge properties and the creative response in the global economy: European evidence for the years 1990–2016," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 459-475, April.
    9. Bronwyn Hall, 2004. "The financing of research and development," Chapters, in: Anthony Bartzokas & Sunil Mani (ed.), Financial Systems, Corporate Investment in Innovation, and Venture Capital, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Charalambos Vlados & Fotios Katimertzopoulos, 2019. "The ¡°Mystery¡± of Innovation: Bridging the Economic and Business Thinking and the Stra.Tech.Man Approach," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 236-262, March.
    11. Rachel Griffith & Stephen Redding & Helen Simpson, 2004. "Foreign Ownership and Productivity: New Evidence from the Service Sector and the R&D Lab," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 440-456, Autumn.
    12. Victoria Golikova & Boris Kuznetsov, 2017. "Suboptimal Size: Factors Preventing the Growth of Russian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 83-93.
    13. Silvia Ardagna & Annamaria Lusardi, 2009. "Where does regulation hurt? Evidence from new businesses across countries," NBER Working Papers 14747, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Simeon Djankov & Edward Miguel & Yingyi Qian & Gerard Roland & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2004. "Entrepreneurship: First Results from Russia," Working Papers w0046, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    15. Jonathan Chiu & Cesaire Meh & Randall Wright, 2017. "Innovation And Growth With Financial, And Other, Frictions," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 58(1), pages 95-125, February.
    16. Paul Hünermund & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2016. "Estimating the local average treatment effect of R&D subsidies in a pan-European program," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 541177, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
    17. Hall, Bronwyn H. & Lerner, Josh, 2010. "The Financing of R&D and Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 609-639, Elsevier.
    18. Lopez-Rodriguez, Jesus & Martinez-Lopez, Diego, 2017. "Looking beyond the R&D effects on innovation: The contribution of non-R&D activities to total factor productivity growth in the EU," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 37-45.
    19. Daniel Nepelski & Giuditta De Prato, 2020. "Technological complexity and economic development," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 448-470, May.
    20. Jonathan Chiu & Cesaire Meh & Randall Wright, 2011. "Innovation and growth with financial, and other, frictions," Working Papers 688, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:72:y:2019:i:22:p:22-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.