IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v73y2020i02p27-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China – Fair Play oder große Konkurrenz?

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna Garnitz
  • Ann-Christin Rathje
  • Ute Hannich

Abstract

Im Auftrag der Stiftung Familienunternehmen befragte das ifo Institut mehr als 1 400 Familien- und Nicht-Familienunternehmen, wie die Konkurrenzintensität zu chinesischen Unternehmen bzw. deren Produkten im europäischen Binnenmarkt ist und wie sich die Europäische Union gegenüber der Volksrepublik positionieren sollte. Die befragten Unternehmen erwarten vor allem die verbesserte Durchsetzung des Schutzes geistigen Eigentums und den Abbau von Investitionsbeschränkungen für europäische Unternehmen in China. Protektionistische Maßnahmen wie Schutzzölle oder Importquoten werden im Hinblick auf China mehrheitlich nicht präferiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna Garnitz & Ann-Christin Rathje & Ute Hannich, 2020. "China – Fair Play oder große Konkurrenz?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(02), pages 27-31, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:73:y:2020:i:02:p:27-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2020-02-garnitz-rathje-hannich-china-2020-02-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clemens Fuest & Achim Wambach & Massimo Motta & Martin Peitz & Klaus-Heiner Röhl & Christian Rusche & Sebastian Dullien & Guntram B. Wolff & Dieter Kempf & Andreas Mundt, 2019. "Zäsur in der europäischen Wettbewerbs- und Industriepolitik: Freie Fahrt für europäische Champions?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(08), pages 03-26, April.
    2. repec:ces:ifosdt:v:72:y:2019:i:08:p: is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Oliver Falck, 2019. "Brauchen wir eine aktive europäische Industriepolitik?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(10), pages 12-15, May.
    4. Gabriel Felbermayr & Moritz Goldbeck & Alexander-Nikolai Sandkamp, 2019. "Feindliche Übernahme? Chinas Auslandsinvestitionen unter der Lupe," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(08), pages 27-39, April.
    5. Bickenbach, Frank & Liu, Wan-Hsin & Li, Guoxue, 2015. "The EU-China bilateral investment agreement in negotiation: Motivation, conflicts and perspectives," Kiel Policy Brief 95, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Falck & Anita Wölfl, 2020. "Auf dem Weg zu einer modernen Industriepolitik," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(01), pages 60-63, January.
    2. Ann-Christin Rathje & Ute Hannich, 2019. "Was erwarten die deutschen Unternehmer von einer Industriepolitik? Industriepolitik 2.020 – quo vadis!?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(22), pages 22-26, November.
    3. DorineBoumans & JohannaGarnitz, 2019. "ifo World Economic Survey May 2019," ifo World Economic Survey, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 18(02), pages 01-25, May.
    4. Wei Yin, 2021. "A comparison of the US and EU regulatory responses to China’s state capitalism: implication, issue and direction," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Curran, Louise & Lv, Ping & Spigarelli, Francesca, 2017. "Chinese investment in the EU renewable energy sector: Motives, synergies and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 670-682.
    6. Ann-Christin Rathje, 2019. "Wie soll die Wirtschaftspolitik der Europäischen Union zukünftig aussehen? – Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(23), pages 27-35, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen; Unternehmen; Außenwirtschaft; Investitionspolitik; Deutschland; China;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:73:y:2020:i:02:p:27-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Klaus Wohlrabe). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.