IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cdh/commen/538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Next-Gen Financial Advice: Digital Innovation and Canada’s Policymakers

Author

Listed:
  • Chuck Grace

    (Richard Ivey School of Business)

Abstract

While the financial services industry wrestles with the challenges of change, our policymakers have an opportunity to take a lead role in defining Canada’s place within the global digital advice landscape. There are numerous creative and exciting solutions being discussed. What we haven’t seen a lot of are clientfacing holistic solutions – and what we don’t have is much time. This paper provides a series of steps for regulators and policymakers to follow that will improve innovation for incumbents and start-ups alike, all while providing an enhanced customer experience in financial advice. Firms are dealing with a looming perfect storm – fee compression, shifting demographics, unrelenting regulatory changes and an erosion in the number of human advisors as advisors who are part of the babyboom look to their own retirement. In this context, technology should be viewed as a savior, rather than a threat. We define a five-year aspiration for the application of digital technology to prudent and valued financial advice. There are several myths we were able to dispel as a result of our research, which we hope will form the basis for a discussion about what’s needed to facilitate a higher level of digital adoption. We nickname it “Next Generation Digital Advice.” The guiding principles and best practices encompass a holistic view of the client, objective data-driven recommendations, full transparency and ease of use. At a high level, the next generation of digital advice offers an opportunity for stronger client impact. It will see human advisors complemented by digital collaboration through technology that is not disruptive but generally proven, likely economical and widely available. Our current regulations per se are not a barrier to this next generation of advice – but our regulatory practices are. And just how much the industry will be disrupted matters because wholesale disruption of our financial services comes with wholesale economic risk. Policymakers play an important role in this transformation starting with a need to take the lead and get in front of the innovations in order to understand their full implications. We need to move swiftly towards open banking and improving on the benchmark set in Europe, break down regulatory silos to allow data mobility in furtherance of stronger client outcomes, update advisor proficiencies for a new normal where technical skills are automated and behavioural skills are required and de-risk the decision to innovate – for start-ups and incumbents alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuck Grace, 2019. "Next-Gen Financial Advice: Digital Innovation and Canada’s Policymakers," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 538, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary%20538.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claude Montmarquette & Nathalie Viennot-Briot, 2019. "The Gamma Factors and the Value of Financial Advice," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 20(1), pages 387-411, May.
    2. Stephen Foerster & Juhani T. Linnainmaa & Brian T. Melzer & Alessandro Previtero, 2017. "Retail Financial Advice: Does One Size Fit All?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1441-1482, August.
    3. Nicholas Le Pan, 2017. "Opportunities for Better Systemic Risk Management in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 490, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John R. J. Thompson & Longlong Feng & R. Mark Reesor & Chuck Grace, 2021. "Know Your Clients’ Behaviours: A Cluster Analysis of Financial Transactions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-29, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Y. Campbell, 2016. "Restoring Rational Choice: The Challenge of Consumer Financial Regulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 1-30, May.
    2. Kirchler, Michael & Lindner, Florian & Weitzel, Utz, 2020. "Delegated investment decisions and rankings," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Sorravich Kingsuwankul & Chloe Tergiman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2023. "Why do oaths work? Image concerns and credibility in promise keeping," Working Papers hal-04209489, HAL.
    4. John R. J. Thompson & Longlong Feng & R. Mark Reesor & Chuck Grace, 2021. "Know Your Clients’ Behaviours: A Cluster Analysis of Financial Transactions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Lucas C. Coffman & Alexander Gotthard-Real, 2019. "Moral Perceptions of Advised Actions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3904-3927, August.
    6. Francesco D'Acunto & Nagpurnanand Prabhala & Alberto G. Rossi, 2018. "The Promises and Pitfalls of Robo-advising," CESifo Working Paper Series 6907, CESifo.
    7. Grønborg, Niels S. & Lunde, Asger & Timmermann, Allan & Wermers, Russ, 2021. "Picking funds with confidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-28.
    8. Christopher P. Clifford & William C. Gerken, 2021. "Property Rights to Client Relationships and Financial Advisor Incentives," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(5), pages 2409-2445, October.
    9. Abigail Hurwitz & Olivia S. Mitchell & Orly Sade, 2021. "Longevity Perceptions and Saving Decisions during the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Experimental Investigation," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 111, pages 297-301, May.
    10. Michael Kirchler & Florian Lindner & Utz Weitzel, 2018. "Delegated Decision Making and Social Competition in the Finance Industry," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2018_08, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    11. Mugerman, Yevgeny & Sade, Orly & Winter, Eyal, 2020. "Out-of-pocket vs. out-of-investment in financial advisory fees: Evidence from the lab," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Hermansson, Cecilia & Song, Han-Suck, 2016. "Financial advisory services meetings and their impact on saving behavior – A difference-in-difference analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 131-139.
    13. Kling, Luisa & König-Kersting, Christian & Trautmann, Stefan T., 2019. "Investment Preferences and Risk Perception: Financial Agents versus Clients," Working Papers 0674, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    14. Andrea Lippi & Laura Barbieri & Mariacristina Piva & Werner De Bondt, 2018. "Time-varying risk behavior and prior investment outcomes: Evidence from Italy," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(5), pages 471-483, September.
    15. Guiso, Luigi & Pozzi, Andrea & Tsoy, Anton & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Mistrulli, Paolo Emilio, 2022. "The cost of steering in financial markets: Evidence from the mortgage market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 1209-1226.
    16. Sandro Ambuehl & B. Douglas Bernheim & Axel Ockenfels, 2019. "Projective Paternalism," CESifo Working Paper Series 7762, CESifo.
    17. Bucher-Koenen, Tabea & Hackethal, Andreas & Koenen, Johannes & Laudenbach, Christine, 2021. "Gender differences in financial advice," SAFE Working Paper Series 309, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    18. Damar, H. Evren & Gropp, Reint E. & Mordel, Adi, 2019. "Flight from safety: How a change to the deposit insurance limit affects households' portfolio allocation," IWH Discussion Papers 19/2019, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    19. Firth, Chris, 2020. "Protecting investors from themselves: Evidence from a regulatory intervention," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    20. Matthias Horn & Andreas Oehler, 2020. "Automated portfolio rebalancing: Automatic erosion of investment performance?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(6), pages 489-505, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Services and Regulation; Consumers' Interests and Protection; Financial Innovation and technology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristine Gray (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.