IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2024v2p189-197.html

Green Business Audit Using Blockchain And Artificial Inteligence Technology

Author

Listed:
  • SAGHIN (DIMA) LOREDANA ADRIANA

    (UNIVERSITATEA DUNAREA DE JOS DIN GALATI, GALATI, ROMANIA)

  • ZUGRAVU CONSTANTA LAURA

    (UNIVERSITATEA DUNAREA DE JOS DIN GALATI, GALATI, ROMANIA)

  • CHIRIL TATIANA

    (UNIVERSITATEA DUNAREA DE JOS DIN GALATI, GALATI, ROMANIA)

  • ZUGRAVU GHEORGHE ADRIAN

    (UNIVERSITATEA DUNAREA DE JOS DIN GALATI, GALATI, ROMANIA)

Abstract

This article examines the impact of blockchain in agriculture and the food supply chain, and discusses the overall implications, challenges and potentials, in context of the green agreement, which is aimed at promoting durability in all sectors, agriculture is an essential role to play in a variety of objectives durable, Introducing blockchain and digital technology could contribute to the development of a sustainable agricultural system. Research points to blockchain as a promising technology for a transparent food supply chain, with many initiatives underway in various food products and food-related issues, but many barriers and challenges still exist, preventing its wider popularity in large among farmers and systems. These challenges involve technical, education, policy and regulatory frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Saghin (Dima) Loredana Adriana & Zugravu Constanta Laura & Chiril Tatiana & Zugravu Gheorghe Adrian, 2024. "Green Business Audit Using Blockchain And Artificial Inteligence Technology," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 189-197, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2024:v:2:p:189-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2024-02/20_Saghin.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oana Staiculescu & Alexandra Sandu, 2016. "Can Social Responsability Be A Kind Of Business?," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 104-108, April.
    2. Samuel Klebaner & Matthieu Montalban, 2020. "Cross-Fertilizations Between Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology: The Case of Régulation Theory and the Sociology of Fields," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 180-198, April.
    3. Camilo Mora & Randi L. Rollins & Katie Taladay & Michael B. Kantar & Mason K. Chock & Mio Shimada & Erik C. Franklin, 2019. "Publisher Correction: Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2 °C," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 80-80, January.
    4. Mohammed Alkahtani & Qazi Salman Khalid & Muhammad Jalees & Muhammad Omair & Ghulam Hussain & Catalin Iulian Pruncu, 2021. "E-Agricultural Supply Chain Management Coupled with Blockchain Effect and Cooperative Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Camilo Mora & Randi L. Rollins & Katie Taladay & Michael B. Kantar & Mason K. Chock & Mio Shimada & Erik C. Franklin, 2018. "Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2°C," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(11), pages 931-933, November.
    6. Paul Dunn, 2020. "The Competitive Intelligence Unit at Deloitte," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 241-247, September.
    7. Candy So Suk Yi & Eric Yung & Christopher Fong & Shilpi Tripathi, 2020. "Benefits and Use of Blockchain Technology to Human Resources Management: A Critical Review," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 131140-1311, December.
    8. Burja Vasile & Burja Camelia, 2017. "Financial Performance And The Business Risk In Agricultural Sector Of Romania," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 75-82, June.
    9. de Vos, Rosanne E. & Suwarno, Aritta & Slingerland, Maja & van der Meer, Peter J. & Lucey, Jennifer M., 2023. "Pre-certification conditions of independent oil palm smallholders in Indonesia. Assessing prospects for RSPO certification," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    10. Ying Lu & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Rural Development Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Alena Harbiankova & Lora Gertsberg, 2022. "Information Model for Sustainable Rural Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    12. O’Sullivan, Mary & Marie, Jonathan & Labrousse, Agnès & Montalban, Matthieu, 2018. "History, Economics and Society: Dividends of Development, Dividends of Interdisciplinarity. An interview with Mary O’Sullivan," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 24.
    13. Banta Viorel-Costin, 2018. "Integration Of Kpi Applications In The Management Accounting Suites Using Sap Fiori, Portal And Cloud. A Study Case," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 131-137, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saghin (Dima) Loredana Adriana & Zugravu Constanta Laura & Lazar (Gurgu-Lazar) Carmen & Mogildea Ludmila & Zugravu Gheorghe Adrian, 2024. "Blockchain Neutrosophic Model For Fuzzy Quality Certification Of Traditional Products," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 113-122, April.
    2. Hector F. Calvo-Pardo & Tullio Mancini & Jose Olmo, 2022. "Machine Learning the Carbon Footprint of Bitcoin Mining," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-30, February.
    3. Huo, Dongyang & Malik, Asad Waqar & Ravana, Sri Devi & Rahman, Anis Ur & Ahmedy, Ismail, 2024. "Mapping smart farming: Addressing agricultural challenges in data-driven era," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    4. Baur, Dirk G. & Oll, Josua, 2022. "Bitcoin investments and climate change: A financial and carbon intensity perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    5. Yan, Wan-Lin & (Wai Kong) Cheung, Adrian & Yuan, Jiawei, 2026. "The impact of green cryptocurrency and nongreen cryptocurrency on energy markets: Evidence from geopolitical risk and higher-order moment connectedness," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Lin William Cong & Zhiguo He & Jiasun Li & Wei Jiang, 2021. "Decentralized Mining in Centralized Pools [Concentrating on the fall of the labor share]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(3), pages 1191-1235.
    7. Aimin Zhang & Moses Nanyun Nankpan & Bo Zhou & Joseph Ato Forson & Edmund Nana Kwame Nkrumah & Samuel Evergreen Adjavon, 2024. "A COP28 Perspective: Does Chinese Investment and Fintech Help to Achieve the SDGs of African Economies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Zhang, Dongna & Chen, Xihui Haviour & Lau, Chi Keung Marco & Xu, Bing, 2023. "Implications of cryptocurrency energy usage on climate change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Julien Prat & Benjamin Walter, 2021. "An Equilibrium Model of the Market for Bitcoin Mining," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(8), pages 2415-2452.
    10. Ying Lu & Walter Timo de Vries, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Rural Development in China over the Past 40 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Geng, Yuqing & Liu, Liwen & Chen, Lingyan, 2023. "Rural revitalization of China: A new framework, measurement and forecast," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Ren, Boru & Lucey, Brian, 2022. "A clean, green haven?—Examining the relationship between clean energy, clean and dirty cryptocurrencies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Xuejia Sang & Xiaopeng Leng & Linfu Xue & Xiangjin Ran, 2022. "Based on the Time-Spatial Power-Based Cryptocurrency Miner Driving Force Model, Establish a Global CO 2 Emission Prediction Framework after China Bans Cryptocurrency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Clark, Ephraim & Lahiani, Amine & Mefteh-Wali, Salma, 2023. "Cryptocurrency return predictability: What is the role of the environment?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    15. Wenpin Tang & David D. Yao, 2023. "Trading under the proof‐of‐stake protocol – A continuous‐time control approach," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 979-1004, October.
    16. Michael L. Polemis & Mike G. Tsionas, 2023. "The environmental consequences of blockchain technology: A Bayesian quantile cointegration analysis for Bitcoin," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1602-1621, April.
    17. Radosław Miśkiewicz & Krzysztof Matan & Jakub Karnowski, 2022. "The Role of Crypto Trading in the Economy, Renewable Energy Consumption and Ecological Degradation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Weixia Yang & Congli Xie & Lindong Ma, 2023. "Dose blockchain-based agri-food supply chain guarantee the initial information authenticity? An evolutionary game perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, June.
    19. Ali, Omar & Momin, Mujtaba & Shrestha, Anup & Das, Ronnie & Alhajj, Fadia & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2023. "A review of the key challenges of non-fungible tokens," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    20. Kateryna Kononova, Anton Dek, 2019. "Bitcoin mining electricity consumption and carbon footprint," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 73-88.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2024:v:2:p:189-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.