IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2017v6p138-146.html

Comparative Analysis Of Bankruptcy Risk For Some Romanian Societies Listed On Bucharest Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • FIRESCU VICTORIA

    (UNIVERSITY OF PITESTI, ROMANIA)

  • POPESCU JENICA

    (UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA, ROMANIA)

  • POPA BOGDAN

    (UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA, ROMANIA)

Abstract

In the present, risks are always present, but this thing doesn’t mean that the society can’t carry on the economic activity in conditions of a favorable result. Through the risks to which the entity is subject, an important place is the risk of bankruptcy. The level of this risk can be determined by using of large number of liquidity and solvability indicators on the base of dates from the balance of accounts and from the profit and loosing cont. In this paper is analyzed by comparison the risk of bankruptcy of companies listed at Bucharest Stock Exchange from three sectors of activity: production, commerce and tourism. It is analyzed the evolution of score Z, indicator representative for the risk of bankruptcy, on a period of 14 years (2002-2015), enough for every society and sector. The sample of 15 enterprises has been formed on basis of information available for this research. After analysis of results, we notice that the best results concerning the risk of bankruptcy are recorded in the commerce sector and on the last place is situated the tourism sector. In an future approach we will continue the research on a larger number of enterprises, and we will analyze the cause that lead to bankruptcy of societies, emphasizing to elaborate a systems which lead to a lower level the risk of bankruptcy.

Suggested Citation

  • Firescu Victoria & Popescu Jenica & Popa Bogdan, 2017. "Comparative Analysis Of Bankruptcy Risk For Some Romanian Societies Listed On Bucharest Stock Exchange," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 138-146, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2017:v:6:p:138-146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2017-06/15_Firescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel BRÎNDESCU – OLARIU, 2014. "The Potential Of The Equity Working Capital In The Prediction Of Bankruptcy," Management Intercultural, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 31, pages 25-32, November.
    2. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 589-609, September.
    3. Hamadi Matoussi & Rim Mouelhi & Sayah Salah, 1999. "La Prediction De Faillite Des Entreprises Tunisiennes Par La Regression Logistique," Post-Print halshs-00587769, HAL.
    4. Jatinder Pal Singh, 2017. "Hedge accounting under IFRS 9: an analysis of reforms," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 15(145), pages 103-103, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youssef Zizi & Mohamed Oudgou & Abdeslam El Moudden, 2020. "Determinants and Predictors of SMEs’ Financial Failure: A Logistic Regression Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Hamadi Matoussi & Aida Abdelmoula, 2008. "Using A Neural Network-Based Methodology for Credit–Risk Evaluation of A Tunisian Bank," Working Papers 408, Economic Research Forum, revised 06 Jan 2008.
    3. Daniel BRÎNDESCU – OLARIU, 2016. "Multivariate Model For Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction In Romania," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 7, pages 69-83, June.
    4. Daniel BRÎNDESCU-OLARIU, 2016. "Bankruptcy prediction based on the debt ratio," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(607), S), pages 145-156, Summer.
    5. Zaghdoudi Khemais & Djebali Nesrine & Mezni Mohamed, 2016. "Credit Scoring and Default Risk Prediction: A Comparative Study between Discriminant Analysis & Logistic Regression," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(4), pages 39-53, April.
    6. Barbara Su, 2023. "Banking practices and borrowing firms’ financial reporting quality: evidence from bank cross-selling," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 201-236, March.
    7. Christine V. Zavgren & Michael T. Dugan & James M. Reeve, 1988. "The Association Between Probabilities of Bankruptcy and Market Responses—A Test of Market Anticipation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 27-45, March.
    8. Matthew Smith & Francisco Alvarez, 2022. "Predicting Firm-Level Bankruptcy in the Spanish Economy Using Extreme Gradient Boosting," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 263-295, January.
    9. Stephen Brown & William Goetzmann & Bing Liang & Christopher Schwarz, 2008. "Mandatory Disclosure and Operational Risk: Evidence from Hedge Fund Registration," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(6), pages 2785-2815, December.
    10. Lohmann, Christian & Möllenhoff, Steffen, 2023. "How do bankruptcy risk estimations change in time? Empirical evidence from listed US companies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    11. Premachandra, I.M. & Bhabra, Gurmeet Singh & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "DEA as a tool for bankruptcy assessment: A comparative study with logistic regression technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 412-424, March.
    12. José Carlos Trejo García & Humberto R�os Bol�var & Francisco Almagro V�zquez, 2016. "Actualización del modelo de riesgo crediticio, una necesidad para la banca revolvente en México," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 8(1), pages 17-30.
    13. C, Loran & Eckbo, Espen & Lu, Ching-Chih, 2014. "Does Executive Compensation Reflect Default Risk?," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2014/11, University of Stavanger.
    14. Shaikh, Ibrahim A. & O'Brien, Jonathan Paul & Peters, Lois, 2018. "Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 192-201.
    15. Mikel Bedayo & Raquel Vegas & Gabriel Jiménez & José-Luis Peydró, 2020. "Screening and Loan Origination Time: Lending Standards, Loan Defaults and Bank Failures," Working Papers 1215, Barcelona School of Economics.
    16. repec:ags:aolpei:309925 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Ch. Piette & M.-D. Zachary, 2015. "Sensitivity to the crisis of SME financing in Belgium," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue iii, pages 31-45, December.
    18. Ruey-Ching Hwang & Jhao-Siang Siao & Huimin Chung & C. Chu, 2011. "Assessing bankruptcy prediction models via information content of technical inefficiency," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 263-273, December.
    19. Beck, Thorsten & Laeven, Luc, 2006. "Resolution of failed banks by deposit insurers : cross-country evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3920, The World Bank.
    20. Ruey-Ching Hwang, 2013. "Forecasting credit ratings with the varying-coefficient model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(12), pages 1947-1965, December.
    21. Antonio Davila & George Foster & Xiaobin He & Carlos Shimizu, 2015. "The rise and fall of startups: Creation and destruction of revenue and jobs by young companies," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 6-35, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2017:v:6:p:138-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ecobici Nicolae to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.