IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2014v3p111-118.html

Key Performance Indicators. A Case Study On The Integrated Reports Of An It Company

Author

Listed:
  • GORGAN CATALINA

    (BUCHAREST UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES)

  • DUMITRU VALENTIN FLORENTIN

    (BUCHAREST UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES)

  • GORGAN VASILE

    (BUCHAREST UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES)

Abstract

Our analysis relies on the 2011 integrated report published by SAP, a European IT company included in the International Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC) Pilot Programme Business Network. The research methodology used is the analysis of the content as we search for a number of selected characteristics in the report and also for a set of key performance indicators (KPI). We use as references the guide provided by DVFA (Society of Investment Professionals in Germany) and EFFAS (European Federation of Financial Analysts Societies) – EFFAS (2010) for the software industry. The aim of our study is to analyse the way in which an IT company applies the guidelines recognised by the European Commission to identify and communicate the material nonfinancial information, in order to assess the organization’s abilities to create value on a short, medium and long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Gorgan Catalina & Dumitru Valentin Florentin & Gorgan Vasile, 2014. "Key Performance Indicators. A Case Study On The Integrated Reports Of An It Company," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 111-118, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2014:v:3:p:111-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2014-03/19_Gorgan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert G. Eccles & Michael P. Krzus & Jean Rogers & George Serafeim, 2012. "The Need for Sector-Specific Materiality and Sustainability Reporting Standards," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 24(2), pages 65-71, June.
    2. Dumitru Miron & Monica Petcu & Iulia Maria Sobolevschi, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Sustainable Competitive Advantage," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(29), pages 162-179, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milena Peršić & Lahorka Halmi, 2017. "Non-Financial Information And Integrated Reporting In The Hospitality Industry: Case Study Of Croatia," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 6(3), pages 95-109.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bianca Alves Almeida Machado & Lívia Cristina Pinto Dias & Alberto Fonseca, 2021. "Transparency of materiality analysis in GRI‐based sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 570-580, March.
    2. Grazyna Smigielska & Anna Dabrowska & Malgorzata Radziukiewicz, 2015. "Fair Trade in Sustainable Development. The Potential for Fair Trade Market Growth in Poland," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(Special 9), pages 1244-1244, November.
    3. Jannik Gerwanski & Othar Kordsachia & Patrick Velte, 2019. "Determinants of materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting: Empirical evidence from an international setting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 750-770, July.
    4. Nadia Albu & Catalin Nicolae Albu & Madalina Dumitru & Valentin Florentin Dumitru, 2013. "Plurality or convergence in sustainability reporting standards?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(Special 7), pages 729-742, November.
    5. R. Rajesh & Chandrasekharan Rajendran, 2020. "Relating Environmental, Social, and Governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1247-1267, March.
    6. Vivek Pandey & Natalia Vidal & Rajat Panwar & Lubna Nafees, 2019. "Characterization of Sustainability Leaders and Laggards in the Global Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Ramona Zharfpeykan, 2021. "Representative account or greenwashing? Voluntary sustainability reports in Australia's mining/metals and financial services industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2209-2223, May.
    8. Kurniawan, Putu Sukma, 2018. "An Analysis of Information Materiality on Corporate Sustainability Report Using Information Materiality Map: A Review in Mining Industry in Indonesia," INA-Rxiv 7dzha, Center for Open Science.
    9. Litfin Thorsten & Meeh-Bunse Gunther & Luer Katja & Teckert Özlem, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting – a Stakeholder’s Perspective Approach," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 30-42, March.
    10. repec:osf:inarxi:7dzha_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Angelica Alonso Rivera & Nora Gavira-Durón, 2021. "Responsabilidad Social Empresarial, análisis de largo plazo del impacto sobre el desempeño financiero para empresas del IPC sustentable," Revista de Investigación en Ciencias Contables y Administrativas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Facultad de Contaduría y Ciencias Administrativas, vol. 6(2), pages 80-100, July.
    12. Lööf, Hans & Sahamkhadam, Maziar & Stephan, Andreas, 2022. "Is Corporate Social Responsibility investing a free lunch? The relationship between ESG, tail risk, and upside potential of stocks before and during the COVID-19 crisis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    13. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    14. Angus W. H. Yip & William Y. P. Yu, 2023. "The Quality of Environmental KPI Disclosure in ESG Reporting for SMEs in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Andrea Cardoni & Evgeniia Kiseleva & Simone Terzani, 2019. "Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Apergis, Nicholas & Dastidar, Sayantan Ghosh, 2024. "Local stock liquidity and local factors: Fresh evidence from US firms across states," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    17. Yaffa Moskovich, 2020. "Business Sustainability Strategy in a Cooperative Kibbutz Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Samuel Benjamin & Mansi Mansi & Rakesh Pandey, 2020. "Board gender composition, board independence and sustainable supply chain responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3305-3339, December.
    19. Maria-Ana Georgescu & Emilia Herman, 2014. "Social Corporate Responsibility regarding Household Consumer Satisfaction with the Electric Power Supply Services," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 123-123, February.
    20. Ralf Barkemeyer & Breeda Comyns & Frank Figge & Giulio Napolitano, 2014. "CEO statements in sustainability reports: Substantive information or background noise?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 241-257, December.
    21. Zhu, Bangzhu & Xu, Chenxin & Wang, Ping & Zhang, Lin, 2022. "How does internal carbon pricing affect corporate environmental performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 65-77.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2014:v:3:p:111-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.