IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v65y2019i7id289-2018-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-making style of agribusiness managers

Author

Listed:
  • Katarina Remenova
  • Nadezda Jankelova

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business Management, University of Economics, Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

How agricultural managers gain, process and use information in decision-making and problem-solving process refers to decision-making styles. A successful decision depends on the flexibility of using decision-making styles in different situations. The research paper monitors the dependence between the decision-making style of agricultural managers and their personal and working parameters. To identify the decision-making styles, the MB-type indicator (Myers-Briggs type indicator) was used. The results of non-parametric testing give proof that there is a statistically significant dependence between the type of decision problem and decision-making style, "Intuitive" and "Sensing". Parametric test ANOVA was applied to assess potential differences in the score of decision-making style by nominal-level variables. The results gave proof of a strong statistically significant difference in score of decision-making style, "Intuitive" and "Sensing" between groups of current leading position. The difference in scoring for "Thinking" and "Feeling" as decision-making styles was confirmed to be statistically significant even in functional areas of control. Subsequently, the size of this difference was calculated.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarina Remenova & Nadezda Jankelova, 2019. "Decision-making style of agribusiness managers," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(7), pages 322-330.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:65:y:2019:i:7:id:289-2018-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/289/2018-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/289/2018-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/289/2018-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/289/2018-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pavel TOMŠÍK & Emil SVOBODA, 2010. "Diagnostics and decision-making of the company management within the period of economiccrisis and recession," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(7), pages 303-309.
    2. Jimena Gonzalez-Ramirez & Poonam Arora & Guillermo Podesta, 2018. "Using Insights from Prospect Theory to Enhance Sustainable Decision Making by Agribusinesses in Argentina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Ambrien Ahmed & N Hasnain & M Venkatesan, 2012. "Decision Making in Relation to Personality Types and Cognitive Styles of Business Students," The IUP Journal of Management Research, IUP Publications, vol. 0(2), pages 20-29, April.
    4. Ohlmer, Bo & Olson, Kent & Brehmer, Berndt, 1998. "Understanding farmers' decision making processes and improving managerial assistance," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 273-290, May.
    5. Bo ÖhlméYr & Kent Olson & Berndt Brehmer, 1998. "Understanding farmers' decision making processes and improving managerial assistance," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(3), pages 273-290, May.
    6. Ivana TICHÁ & Jan HRON & Jiří FIEDLER, 2010. "Managerial decision making - importance of intuition in the rational process," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(12), pages 553-557.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patil, Vikram & Ghosh, Ranjan & Kathuria, Vinish & Farrell, Katharine N., 2020. "Money, Land or self-employment? Understanding preference heterogeneity in landowners’ choices for compensation under land acquisition in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Williams, John & Malcolm, Bill, 2012. "Farmer decisions about selling wheat and managing wheat price risk in Australia," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 20, pages 1-10.
    3. Baoling Zou & Biliang Luo, 2018. "Why the Uncertain Term Occurs in the Farmland Lease Market: Evidence from Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Nuthall, Peter L., 2012. "The intuitive world of farmers – The case of grazing management systems and experts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 65-73.
    5. Nuthall, Peter L., 1999. "Managerial Ability (The Forgotten Resource) Its Assessment And Modification," 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand 124495, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Marie Asma Ben-Othmen & Mariia Ostapchuk, 2023. "How diverse are farmers’ preferences for large-scale grassland ecological restoration? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 341-375, December.
    7. L. Tsourgiannis & M. Warren & A. Karasavvoglou & J. Eddison, 2012. "Marketing Strategies for the Primary Sector: An Empirical Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 147-178.
    8. Silvia Macchia, 2022. "Unbundling the information needs of new-generation agricultural companies," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2 Suppl.), pages 117-141.
    9. Nuthall, P. L., 2001. "Managerial ability -- a review of its basis and potential improvement using psychological concepts," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 247-262, March.
    10. Feola, Giuseppe & Binder, Claudia R., 2010. "Towards an improved understanding of farmers' behaviour: The integrative agent-centred (IAC) framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2323-2333, October.
    11. Akhmadiyeva, Zarema & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2021. "How does practice matches land laws in Central Asia?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Pereira, Mariana A. & Fairweather, John R. & Woodford, Keith B. & Nuthall, Peter L., 2016. "Assessing the diversity of values and goals amongst Brazilian commercial-scale progressive beef farmers using Q-methodology," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-8.
    13. Walder, Peter & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2018. "The Environmental Behaviour of Farmers – Capturing the Diversity of Perspectives with a Q Methodological Approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 55-63.
    14. François J Dessart & Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé & René van Bavel, 2019. "Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 46(3), pages 417-471.
    15. O'Leary, Niall & Tranter, Richard & Bennett, Richard, 2017. "Farmer attitudes predictive of profitability," 91st Annual Conference, April 24-26, 2017, Royal Dublin Society, Dublin, Ireland 258638, Agricultural Economics Society.
    16. Maczkowiack, R.I. & Smith, C.S. & Slaughter, G.J. & Mulligan, D.R. & Cameron, D.C., 2012. "Grazing as a post-mining land use: A conceptual model of the risk factors," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 76-89.
    17. Nkamleu, Guy Blaise, 2007. "Religious faith and agricultural growth: exploring some correlations in Africa," MPRA Paper 11131, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2007.
    18. Vandermersch, Mieke & Mathijs, Erik, 2002. "Do Management Profiles Matter? An Analysis of Belgian Dairy Farmers," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24832, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Kotevska, Ana & Martinovska-Stojcheska, Aleksandra & Öhlmér, Bo & Dimitrievski, Dragi, 2014. "Expectations motivating the Macedonian farmers in attaining EU standards," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182831, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Maruster, Laura & Faber, Niels R. & Jorna, René J. & van Haren, Rob, 2008. "Analysing agricultural users' patterns of behaviour: The case of OPTIRas(TM), a decision support system for starch crop selection," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 159-166, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:65:y:2019:i:7:id:289-2018-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.