IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bsa/jtaken/v10y2024i2p191-213id1803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using LDA for audit risk assessment of the Indonesian BOS fund: Insights from news analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Iis Istianah

  • Nia Pramita Sari

  • Afrialdi Syahputra Butar Butar

  • Bonar Cornellius Pasaribu

Abstract

This study explores the implementation of text mining in audit risk assessment. We use the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) algorithm to reveal hidden topics representing risks in the management of the Indonesian School Operational Assistance Fund (BOS Fund). Using 1,460 news data points from a leading Indonesian news portal, this study proves that using text mining with the LDA algorithm effectively identifies the risks of an audit object. This study makes two important contributions to the information systems and audit literature. First, it provides evidence from online news archives to facilitate a more reliable, current, and comprehensive selection of potential audit areas by encompassing evolving social realities and facts. In the contemporary era, the accelerated and precise dissemination of information via the Internet renders the LDA approach feasible and prudent. Second, it provides a practical and applicable framework for audit risk assessment using nonfinancial sources from independent parties, which can be used as a guide for the development of audit models in the public and private sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Iis Istianah & Nia Pramita Sari & Afrialdi Syahputra Butar Butar & Bonar Cornellius Pasaribu, 2024. "Using LDA for audit risk assessment of the Indonesian BOS fund: Insights from news analysis," Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, vol. 10(2), pages 191-213.
  • Handle: RePEc:bsa:jtaken:v:10:y:2024:i:2:p:191-213:id:1803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jurnal.bpk.go.id/TAKEN/article/view/1803
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dyer, Travis & Lang, Mark & Stice-Lawrence, Lorien, 2017. "The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 221-245.
    2. Knechel, W. Robert, 2007. "The business risk audit: Origins, obstacles and opportunities," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 383-408.
    3. Tserenpurev Chuluunsaikhan & Ga-Ae Ryu & Kwan-Hee Yoo & HyungChul Rah & Aziz Nasridinov, 2020. "Incorporating Deep Learning and News Topic Modeling for Forecasting Pork Prices: The Case of South Korea," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Caylor, Marcus & Cecchini, Mark & Winchel, Jennifer, 2017. "Analysts' qualitative statements and the profitability of favorable investment recommendations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 33-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guénin-Paracini, Henri & Malsch, Bertrand & Paillé, Anne Marché, 2014. "Fear and risk in the audit process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 264-288.
    2. McCannon, Bryan & Zhou, Yang & Hall, Joshua, 2021. "Measuring a Contract’s Breadth: A Text Analysis," Working Papers 11013, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    3. Everett, Jeff & Shiraz Rahaman, Abu & Neu, Dean & Saxton, Gregory, 2024. "Letters to the editor, institutional experimentation, and the public accounting professional," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Vanhaverbeke, Steven & Balsmeier, Benjamin & Doherr, Thorsten, 2024. "Mandatory financial information disclosure and credit ratings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1).
    5. Pastwa, Anna M. & Shrestha, Prabal & Thewissen, James & Torsin, Wouter, 2021. "Unpacking the black box of ICO white papers: a topic modeling approach," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2021018, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    6. Wang, Sumingyue & Wang, Xinlu & Xu, Liang, 2023. "Debt maturity structure and the quality of risk disclosures," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Elsayed, Mohamed & Elshandidy, Tamer, 2021. "Internal control effectiveness, textual risk disclosure, and their usefulness: U.S. evidence," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    8. Wayne B. Thomas & Yiding Wang & Ling Zhang, 2024. "Algorithmic Trading and Forward‐Looking MD&A Disclosures," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 62(4), pages 1533-1569, September.
    9. Andrew Bird & Stephen A. Karolyi & Thomas G. Ruchti, 2023. "How Do Firms Respond to Political Uncertainty? Evidence from U.S. Gubernatorial Elections," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 61(4), pages 1025-1061, September.
    10. M. J. Histen, 2022. "Taking Information Seriously: A Firm-side Interpretation of Risk Factor Disclosure," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 28(3), pages 119-131, November.
    11. Ji, Xu-dong & Lu, Wei & Qu, Wen, 2018. "Internal control risk and audit fees: Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 266-287.
    12. Yicheng Wang & Brian Wright, 2024. "Tax-strategy-related words, firm’s ability, and tax avoidance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 685-713, December.
    13. Xu, Weidong & Luo, Zijun & Li, Donghui, 2024. "Investor–firm interactions and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    14. Claudine Mangen & Alexia Paduano & Bianca Paduano & Jessica Hadzurik & Juliano Leggio & Kayla Russo, 2020. "Smoke and Mirrors? Disclosures in the Marijuana Industry in Canada," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 149-179, September.
    15. Holm, Claus & Zaman, Mahbub, 2012. "Regulating audit quality: Restoring trust and legitimacy," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 51-61.
    16. Wally Smieliauskas, 2008. "A Framework for Identifying (and Avoiding) Fraudulent Financial Reporting," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 189-226, August.
    17. Zhang, Yi & Liu, Tianxiang & Li, Weiping, 2024. "Corporate fraud detection based on linguistic readability vector: Application to financial companies in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    18. Toni Ahnert & Christoph Bertsch, 2022. "A Wake-Up Call Theory of Contagion [Asymmetric business cycles: theory and time-series evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(4), pages 829-854.
    19. Bucaro, Anthony C., 2019. "Enhancing auditors' critical thinking in audits of complex estimates," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 35-49.
    20. Motta Queiroz, Mariza & Roque, Carlos & Moura, Filipe & Marôco, João, 2024. "Understanding the expectations of parents regarding their children's school commuting by public transport using latent Dirichlet Allocation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bsa:jtaken:v:10:y:2024:i:2:p:191-213:id:1803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Selvia Vivi Devianti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jurnal.bpk.go.id/index.php/TAKEN/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.