IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v13y2014i1p35-48n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple comparisons in genetic association studies: a hierarchical modeling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Nengjun
  • Lou Xiang-Yang
  • Mallick Himel

    (Department of Biostatistics, Section on Statistical Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA)

  • Xu Shizhong

    (Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA)

Abstract

Multiple comparisons or multiple testing has been viewed as a thorny issue in genetic association studies aiming to detect disease-associated genetic variants from a large number of genotyped variants. We alleviate the problem of multiple comparisons by proposing a hierarchical modeling approach that is fundamentally different from the existing methods. The proposed hierarchical models simultaneously fit as many variables as possible and shrink unimportant effects towards zero. Thus, the hierarchical models yield more efficient estimates of parameters than the traditional methods that analyze genetic variants separately, and also coherently address the multiple comparisons problem due to largely reducing the effective number of genetic effects and the number of statistically “significant” effects. We develop a method for computing the effective number of genetic effects in hierarchical generalized linear models, and propose a new adjustment for multiple comparisons, the hierarchical Bonferroni correction, based on the effective number of genetic effects. Our approach not only increases the power to detect disease-associated variants but also controls the Type I error. We illustrate and evaluate our method with real and simulated data sets from genetic association studies. The method has been implemented in our freely available R package BhGLM (http://www.ssg.uab.edu/bhglm/).

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Nengjun & Lou Xiang-Yang & Mallick Himel & Xu Shizhong, 2014. "Multiple comparisons in genetic association studies: a hierarchical modeling approach," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 35-48, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:13:y:2014:i:1:p:35-48:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2012-0040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2012-0040
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/sagmb-2012-0040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, Trevor & Casella, George, 2008. "The Bayesian Lasso," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 681-686, June.
    2. Thomas J Hoffmann & Nicholas J Marini & John S Witte, 2010. "Comprehensive Approach to Analyzing Rare Genetic Variants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-9, November.
    3. Kang Guolian & Ye Keying & Liu Nianjun & Allison David B. & Gao Guimin, 2009. "Weighted Multiple Hypothesis Testing Procedures," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, April.
    4. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Debamita Kundu & Riten Mitra & Jeremy T. Gaskins, 2021. "Bayesian variable selection for multioutcome models through shared shrinkage," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 295-320, March.
    2. David Kaplan & Chansoon Lee, 2018. "Optimizing Prediction Using Bayesian Model Averaging: Examples Using Large-Scale Educational Assessments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 42(4), pages 423-457, August.
    3. Hauzenberger Niko & Huber Florian & Pfarrhofer Michael & Zörner Thomas O., 2021. "Stochastic model specification in Markov switching vector error correction models," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 25(2), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Yu Takagi & Hirokazu Matsuda & Yukio Taniguchi & Hiroaki Iwaisaki, 2014. "Predicting the Phenotypic Values of Physiological Traits Using SNP Genotype and Gene Expression Data in Mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Dimitris Korobilis & Kenichi Shimizu, 2022. "Bayesian Approaches to Shrinkage and Sparse Estimation," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 11(4), pages 230-354, June.
    6. Nott, David J. & Leng, Chenlei, 2010. "Bayesian projection approaches to variable selection in generalized linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3227-3241, December.
    7. Tenan, Simone & O’Hara, Robert B. & Hendriks, Iris & Tavecchia, Giacomo, 2014. "Bayesian model selection: The steepest mountain to climb," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 283(C), pages 62-69.
    8. Oliver J. Rutz & Garrett P. Sonnier, 2019. "VANISH regularization for generalized linear models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 415-437, December.
    9. Se Yoon Lee & Bani K. Mallick, 2022. "Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling: Application Towards Production Results in the Eagle Ford Shale of South Texas," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 1-43, May.
    10. Feng, Xiangnan & Lu, Bin & Song, Xinyuan & Ma, Shuang, 2019. "Financial literacy and household finances: A Bayesian two-part latent variable modeling approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 119-137.
    11. Joyee Ghosh & Amy H. Herring & Anna Maria Siega-Riz, 2011. "Bayesian Variable Selection for Latent Class Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 917-925, September.
    12. Li, Jianan & Han, Xiaoyi, 2019. "Bayesian Lassos for spatial durbin error model with smoothness prior: Application to detect spillovers of China's treaty ports," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 38-74.
    13. Yinghan Chen & Steven Andrew Culpepper & Yuguo Chen, 2023. "Bayesian Inference for an Unknown Number of Attributes in Restricted Latent Class Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 613-635, June.
    14. Saverio Ranciati & Giuliano Galimberti & Gabriele Soffritti, 2019. "Bayesian variable selection in linear regression models with non-normal errors," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(2), pages 323-358, June.
    15. Jianhong Wang & Xiaoyan Lin, 2020. "A Bayesian approach for semiparametric regression analysis of panel count data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 402-420, April.
    16. Hamura, Yasuyuki & Irie, Kaoru & Sugasawa, Shonosuke, 2022. "Log-regularly varying scale mixture of normals for robust regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Bansal, Prateek & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2021. "A new spatial count data model with time-varying parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 566-586.
    18. Mumtaz, Haroon & Theodoridis, Konstantinos, 2017. "Common and country specific economic uncertainty," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 205-216.
    19. Jesse Elliott & Zemin Bai & Shu-Ching Hsieh & Shannon E Kelly & Li Chen & Becky Skidmore & Said Yousef & Carine Zheng & David J Stewart & George A Wells, 2020. "ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:13:y:2014:i:1:p:35-48:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.