IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v15y2024i3p225-248n1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Essential Role of Human Service Nonprofits in Restorative Justice Policy Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Moore Paige L.

    (School of Public and International Affairs, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA)

  • Lawrence Kara L.

    (Doctor of Philosophy in Public Administration, School of Public and International Affairs, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA)

Abstract

Evidence demonstrating the essential role of human service nonprofits in restoring justice to communities has led to an increased need in understanding how these nonprofits view their service delivery role in relation to the state in a restorative justice context. Despite the increase in funding dedicated to restorative justice programs and increased collaborations between states and nonprofits, few studies have explored perceptions of collaborative restorative justice roles in state-led initiatives. This exploratory qualitative study uses semi-structured interviews to understand how leaders in these programs view their organization’s roles in restorative justice implementation. The analysis evaluates the variations in perceptions among nonprofits leaders as well as the differences in perceptions between nonprofit versus public managers/policy makers. Results indicate that nonprofit leaders and public managers/policy makers view nonprofits as pivotal to restorative justice policy implementation given their capacity to engage in grassroots problem-solving and develop strengths-based programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Moore Paige L. & Lawrence Kara L., 2024. "The Essential Role of Human Service Nonprofits in Restorative Justice Policy Implementation," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 225-248.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:15:y:2024:i:3:p:225-248:n:1003
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2022-0040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2022-0040
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2022-0040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael L. Rosino & Matthew W. Hughey, 2018. "The War on Drugs, Racial Meanings, and Structural Racism: A Holistic and Reproductive Approach," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(3-4), pages 849-892, May.
    2. Judith Green, 2004. "Book Review: Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 9(4), pages 108-109, November.
    3. Gelman, Andrew & Fagan, Jeffrey & Kiss, Alex, 2007. "An Analysis of the New York City Police Department's," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 813-823, September.
    4. Pol, Eduardo & Ville, Simon, 2009. "Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 878-885, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Bragaglia, 2024. "The University and the Neighbourhood—Opportunities and Limits in Promoting Social Innovation: The Case of AuroraLAB in Turin (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. E Sormani & K Uude, 2022. "Academics’ prosocial motivation for engagement with society: The case of German academics in health science [Why Do Academics Engage Locally? Insights from the University of Stavanger]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(6), pages 962-971.
    3. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Faith Osasumwen Olanrewaju & Adekunle Olanrewaju & Femi Omotoso & Joshua Olaniyi Alabi & Emmanuel Amoo & Ejiroghene Loromeke & Lady Adaina Ajayi, 2019. "Insurgency and the Invisible Displaced Population in Nigeria: A Situational Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    5. Dionisio, Marcelo & de Vargas, Eduardo Raupp, 2022. "Integrating Corporate Social Innovations and cross-collaboration: An empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 794-803.
    6. Francesca Gennari, 2023. "The transition towards a circular economy. A framework for SMEs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1423-1457, December.
    7. Jørgensen, Matias Thuen & Hansen, Anne Vorre & Sørensen, Flemming & Fuglsang, Lars & Sundbo, Jon & Jensen, Jens Friis, 2021. "Collective tourism social entrepreneurship: A means for community mobilization and social transformation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    9. Senanu Kwasi Kutor & Oklikah Desmond Ofori & Thelma Akyea & Godwin Arku, 2025. "Climate change-immobility nexus: perspectives of voluntary immobile populations from three coastal communities in Ghana," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 1-23, February.
    10. repec:plo:pone00:0009149 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Sriroop Chaudhuri & Mimi Roy & Louis M. McDonald & Yves Emendack, 2021. "Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2973-3008, March.
    12. Raquel Francisco Mafra & Jacir Leonir Casagrande & Ana Regina de Aguiar Dutra & Nei Antonio Nunes & Felipe Texeira Dias & Samuel Borges Barbosa & José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra, 2024. "Social Innovation as a Support for the Visibility of Vulnerable Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    13. repec:rfh:jprjor:v:9:y:2023:i:2:p:701-708 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Novikova Marina & de Fátima Ferreiro Maria & Stryjakiewicz Tadeusz, 2020. "Local Development Initiatives as Promoters of Social Innovation: Evidence from Two European Rural Regions," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(2), pages 43-53, June.
    15. Paola M. A. Paniccia & Luna Leoni & Silvia Baiocco, 2017. "Interpreting Sustainability through Co-Evolution: Evidence from Religious Accommodations in Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Niftiyev, Ibrahim, 2022. "The Role of Public Spending and The Quality of Public Services in E-government Development," EconStor Conference Papers 256899, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    17. repec:eur:ejserj:467 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Noor, Nur Hanis Mohamad & Ng, Boon-Kwee & Hamid, Mohd Johaary Abdul, 2020. "Forging researchers-farmers partnership in public social innovation: a case study of Malaysia’s agro-based public research institution," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(4), June.
    19. Thomas Reindersma & Isabelle Fabbricotti & Kees Ahaus & Sandra Sülz, 2022. "Integrated Payment, Fragmented Realities? A Discourse Analysis of Integrated Payment in the Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Rosalia Diaz-Carrion & Noelia Franco-Leal, 2022. "Social and strategic innovation: extending the varieties of capitalism to asian countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1453-1474, December.
    21. Barbara Scozzi & Nicola Bellantuono & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2017. "Managing Open Innovation in Urban Labs," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 857-874, September.
    22. Paul Windrum & Doris Schartinger & Luis Rubalcaba & Faiz F. Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2016. "The co-creation of multi-agent social innovations," Post-Print halshs-01322603, HAL.
    23. Ivana Živojinović & Alice Ludvig & Karl Hogl, 2019. "Social Innovation to Sustain Rural Communities: Overcoming Institutional Challenges in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:15:y:2024:i:3:p:225-248:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.