IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v10y2019i1p13n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Less-Known History of the Voluntary Sector in an East Asian Welfare Regime: A South Korean Case

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Suyoung

    (Department of Social Welfare, Seoul National Unversity, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of))

Abstract

Although the voluntary sector is internationally valued as an integral component of the welfare mix, studies on East Asian welfare regimes have primarily focused on state-market-family interactions, paying scant attention to the long-standing and pivotal role of voluntary agencies in their construction. This case study illuminates this less-known aspect of modern welfare history in the context of South Korea, with a particular focus on the activities of voluntary organizations. The study categorizes South Korean voluntary associations into four types and examines their different contributions in shaping South Korea’s welfare regime, by applying Young’s framework on government–voluntary organizations relations. This historical exploration on the South Korean voluntary sector aims to deepen understanding of an East Asian welfare state regime. It further suggests that current welfare mix debates, focusing on the service delivery role of voluntary organizations within Western European welfare states, should be broadened.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Suyoung, 2019. "The Less-Known History of the Voluntary Sector in an East Asian Welfare Regime: A South Korean Case," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:13:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2018-0028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2018-0028
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2018-0028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Holliday, 2000. "Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 48(4), pages 706-723, September.
    2. Pan Kim & M. Jae Moon, 2003. "NGOs as Incubator of Participative Democracy in South Korea: Political, Voluntary, and Policy Participation," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 549-567.
    3. Kendall, Jeremy, 2000. "The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990s: whys and wherefores," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29028, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo Kyong Seo & Dayoon Kim, 2024. "THE HOUSING‐WELFARE REGIME AND THIRD‐SECTOR HOUSING IN HONG KONG AND SOUTH KOREA: A Historical Institutionalist Perspective," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 442-462, May.
    2. Yunhui Wang & Yihua Chen & Zhiying Li, 2024. "Escaping poverty: changing characteristics of China’s rural poverty reduction policy and future trends," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Julie Vanderleyden & Hyojin Seo & Christophe Vanroelen & Deborah Moortel, 2025. "Employment Quality: A Social Determinant of Health and Well-Being in a Changing Labor Market in Korea," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 733-770, January.
    4. Huck-ju Kwon, 2007. "Transforming the developmental welfare states in East Asia," Working Papers 40, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    5. Butcher John & Casey John & Dalton Bronwen, 2012. "An Australian National Compact - Something old, something new?," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-44, October.
    6. Baggott, Rob & Jones, Kathryn, 2014. "The voluntary sector and health policy: The role of national level health consumer and patients' organisations in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 202-209.
    7. repec:grz:wpsses:2015-03 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Chenhong Peng & Lue Fang & Julia Shu-Huah Wang & Yik Wa Law & Yi Zhang & Paul S. F. Yip, 2019. "Determinants of Poverty and Their Variation Across the Poverty Spectrum: Evidence from Hong Kong, a High-Income Society with a High Poverty Level," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 219-250, July.
    9. Yong-Sook Lee & Eun-Jung Hwang, 2012. "Global Urban Frontiers through Policy Transfer? Unpacking Seoul’s Creative City Programmes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(13), pages 2817-2837, October.
    10. Kendall, Jeremy, 2001. "The third sector and the development of European public policy: a framework for analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29062, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Manville, Graham & Greatbanks, Richard, 2020. "Performance management in hybrid organisations: A study in social housing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 533-545.
    12. Yoon Kyung Kwak & Ming Sheng Wang, 2022. "Exclusion or Inclusion: National Differential Regulations of Migrant Workers’ Employment, Social Protection, and Migrations Policies on Im/Mobilities in East Asia-Examples of South Korea and Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Hung-Yang Lin, 2013. "Benchmarking Policy Inputs and Social Outputs of Retirement Payment Schemes: China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan Compared With the Three Worlds," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(6), pages 1328-1344, June.
    14. Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine, 2017. "The politics of labor market reform in coordinated welfare capitalism: comparing Sweden, Germany, and South Korea," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68210, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Ito Peng & Joseph Wong, 2008. "Institutions and Institutional Purpose: Continuity and Change in East Asian Social Policy," Politics & Society, , vol. 36(1), pages 61-88, March.
    16. Lim Sijeong, 2015. "Financial structures, firms, and the welfare states in South Korea and Singapore," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 327-354, August.
    17. Hironori Tohyama, 2019. "How does a liberalizing market influence a synergy between redistribution preference and social preferences in Asian socio-economies?," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 455-477, December.
    18. Wan, Zheng & Wang, Xuefeng & Sperling, Daniel, 2013. "Policy and politics behind the public transportation systems of China's medium-sized cities: Evidence from the Huizhou reform," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-8.
    19. Florian Brugger, 2016. "Asias Reserve Accumulation: Part of a New Paradigm," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(8), pages 457-476, August.
    20. Chack Wong & Ka Wong & Bong Mok, 2006. "Subjective Well-Being, Societal Condition and Social Policy – The Case Study of a Rich Chinese Society," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 405-428, September.
    21. Ge, Zhong-Ming & Chen, Ren-Xing & Tang, Wei-Zhong & Cong, Yu, 2021. "Why strong employment support for persons with disabilities has not brought about positive outcomes? A qualitative study in mainland China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:13:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.