IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/mcmeap/v17y2011i2p99-131n1.html

Calibration of financial models using quasi-Monte Carlo

Author

Listed:
  • Eichler Andreas

    (Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria.)

  • Leobacher Gunther

    (Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria.)

  • Zellinger Heidrun

    (Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria.)

Abstract

In the area of financial mathematics Monte Carlo simulation is often successfully used to estimate the prices of certain products. However in many cases calibrating Monte Carlo based models to market prices turns out to be difficult due to stochastic noise arising in the objective functionals.This noise can be reduced by the use of fixed point-sets of random numbers which are reused for every new set of parameters (i.e. in every new step of the optimization algorithm used for calibration).In this paper we argue that the above technique can be enhanced by using fixed low discrepancy point-sets (quasi-Monte Carlo method) instead of ones originating from Pseudo-Random-Number generators. The method is applied to two different financial models and the results are compared with the classical one.

Suggested Citation

  • Eichler Andreas & Leobacher Gunther & Zellinger Heidrun, 2011. "Calibration of financial models using quasi-Monte Carlo," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 99-131, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:17:y:2011:i:2:p:99-131:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/mcma.2011.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/mcma.2011.004
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/mcma.2011.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corwin Joy & Phelim P. Boyle & Ken Seng Tan, 1996. "Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Numerical Finance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 926-938, June.
    2. S. Ninomiya & S. Tezuka, 1996. "Toward real-time pricing of complex financial derivatives," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20.
    3. Spassimir H. Paskov & Joseph F. Traub, 1995. "Faster Valuation of Financial Derivatives," Working Papers 95-03-034, Santa Fe Institute.
    4. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1972. "The Valuation of Option Contracts and a Test of Market Efficiency," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 399-417, May.
    5. C. Kaebe & J. Maruhn & E. Sachs, 2009. "Adjoint-based Monte Carlo calibration of financial market models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 351-379, September.
    6. Fredrik Åkesson & John P. Lehoczky, 2000. "Path Generation for Quasi-Monte Carlo Simulation of Mortgage-Backed Securities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1171-1187, September.
    7. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoqun Wang & Ian H. Sloan, 2011. "Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering: An Equivalence Principle and Dimension Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 80-95, February.
    2. Boyle, Phelim & Imai, Junichi & Tan, Ken Seng, 2008. "Computation of optimal portfolios using simulation-based dimension reduction," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 327-338, December.
    3. Xing Jin & Allen X. Zhang, 2006. "Reclaiming Quasi-Monte Carlo Efficiency in Portfolio Value-at-Risk Simulation Through Fourier Transform," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 925-938, June.
    4. Okten, Giray & Eastman, Warren, 2004. "Randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods in pricing securities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 2399-2426, December.
    5. Xiaoqun Wang & Ken Seng Tan, 2013. "Pricing and Hedging with Discontinuous Functions: Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods and Dimension Reduction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 376-389, July.
    6. Xiaoqun Wang, 2009. "Dimension Reduction Techniques in Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods for Option Pricing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 488-504, August.
    7. Tan, Ken Seng & Boyle, Phelim P., 2000. "Applications of randomized low discrepancy sequences to the valuation of complex securities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1747-1782, October.
    8. Boyle, Phelim & Broadie, Mark & Glasserman, Paul, 1997. "Monte Carlo methods for security pricing," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(8-9), pages 1267-1321, June.
    9. Mark Broadie & Jerome B. Detemple, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1145-1177, September.
    10. Fredrik Åkesson & John P. Lehoczky, 2000. "Path Generation for Quasi-Monte Carlo Simulation of Mortgage-Backed Securities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1171-1187, September.
    11. Yu-Ying Tzeng & Paul M. Beaumont & Giray Ökten, 2018. "Time Series Simulation with Randomized Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods: An Application to Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 55-77, June.
    12. Phelim P. Boyle & Adam W. Kolkiewicz & Ken Seng Tan, 2013. "Pricing Bermudan options using low-discrepancy mesh methods," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 841-860, May.
    13. Peter Carr & Liuren Wu, 2014. "Static Hedging of Standard Options," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 3-46.
    14. Syoiti Ninomiya & Yuming Ma, 2025. "A new architecture of high-order deep neural networks that learn martingales," Papers 2505.03789, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    15. Paola Zerilli, 2005. "Option pricing and spikes in volatility: theoretical and empirical analysis," Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2005 76, Money Macro and Finance Research Group.
    16. Huang, Yu Chuan & Chen, Shing Chun, 2002. "Warrants pricing: Stochastic volatility vs. Black-Scholes," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 393-409, September.
    17. Pierre Rostan & Alexandra Rostan & François-Éric Racicot, 2020. "Increment Variance Reduction Techniques with an Application to Multi-name Credit Derivatives," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(1), pages 1-35, January.
    18. David Heath & Eckhard Platen, 2002. "A variance reduction technique based on integral representations," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(5), pages 362-369.
    19. Harase Shin, 2019. "Comparison of Sobol’ sequences in financial applications," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1), pages 61-74, March.
    20. Gerstner, Thomas & Griebel, Michael & Holtz, Markus, 2009. "Efficient deterministic numerical simulation of stochastic asset-liability management models in life insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 434-446, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:17:y:2011:i:2:p:99-131:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.