IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v13y2025i1p28n1001.html

Rate doubly robust estimation for weighted average treatment effects

Author

Listed:
  • Wang Yiming

    (Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Liu Yi

    (Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Yang Shu

    (Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

Abstract

The weighted average treatment effect (WATE) defines a versatile class of causal estimands for populations characterized by propensity score weights, including the average treatment effect (ATE), treatment effect on the treated (ATT), on controls (ATC), and for the overlap population (ATO). WATE has broad applicability in social and medical research, as many datasets from these fields align with its framework. However, the literature lacks a systematic investigation into the robustness and efficiency conditions for WATE estimation. Although doubly robust (DR) estimators are well-studied for ATE, their applicability to other WATEs remains uncertain. This paper investigates whether widely used WATEs admit DR or rate doubly robust (RDR) estimators and assesses the role of nuisance function accuracy, particularly with machine learning. Using semiparametric efficient influence function (EIF) theory and double/debiased machine learning (DML), we propose three RDR estimators under specific rate and regularity conditions and evaluate their performance via Monte Carlo simulations. Applications to NHANES data on smoking and blood lead levels, and SIPP data on 401(k) eligibility, demonstrate the methods’ practical relevance in medical and social sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang Yiming & Liu Yi & Yang Shu, 2025. "Rate doubly robust estimation for weighted average treatment effects," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:28:n:1001
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2024-0073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2024-0073
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2024-0073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney Newey & James Robins, 2018. "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-68, February.
    2. Larry Han & Jue Hou & Kelly Cho & Rui Duan & Tianxi Cai, 2025. "Federated Adaptive Causal Estimation (FACE) of Target Treatment Effects," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 120(551), pages 1503-1516, July.
    3. Glynn, Adam N. & Quinn, Kevin M., 2010. "An Introduction to the Augmented Inverse Propensity Weighted Estimator," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 36-56, January.
    4. Poterba, James M. & Venti, Steven F. & Wise, David A., 1995. "Do 401(k) contributions crowd out other personal saving?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 1-32, September.
    5. Elizabeth L. Ogburn & Andrea Rotnitzky & James M. Robins, 2015. "Doubly robust estimation of the local average treatment effect curve," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 77(2), pages 373-396, March.
    6. Heejung Bang & James M. Robins, 2005. "Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 962-973, December.
    7. Xinwei Ma & Jingshen Wang, 2020. "Robust Inference Using Inverse Probability Weighting," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(532), pages 1851-1860, December.
    8. Richard K. Crump & V. Joseph Hotz & Guido W. Imbens & Oscar A. Mitnik, 2006. "Moving the Goalposts: Addressing Limited Overlap in Estimation of Average Treatment Effects by Changing the Estimand," Working Papers 0608, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
    9. Fan Li & Kari Lock Morgan & Alan M. Zaslavsky, 2018. "Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(521), pages 390-400, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ganesh Karapakula, 2023. "Stable Probability Weighting: Large-Sample and Finite-Sample Estimation and Inference Methods for Heterogeneous Causal Effects of Multivalued Treatments Under Limited Overlap," Papers 2301.05703, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    2. Sallin, Aurelién, 2021. "Estimating returns to special education: combining machine learning and text analysis to address confounding," Economics Working Paper Series 2109, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    3. Yumou Qiu & Jing Tao & Xiao‐Hua Zhou, 2021. "Inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using observational data with high‐dimensional covariates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 1016-1043, November.
    4. Sokbae Lee & Ryo Okui & Yoon†Jae Whang, 2017. "Doubly robust uniform confidence band for the conditional average treatment effect function," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), pages 1207-1225, November.
    5. Kevin P. Josey & Elizabeth Juarez‐Colunga & Fan Yang & Debashis Ghosh, 2021. "A framework for covariate balance using Bregman distances," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(3), pages 790-816, September.
    6. Tiffany (Tianhui) Cai & Hongseok Namkoong & Steve Yadlowsky, 2026. "Diagnosing Model Performance Under Distribution Shift," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(2), pages 898-916, March.
    7. Aur'elien Sallin, 2021. "Estimating returns to special education: combining machine learning and text analysis to address confounding," Papers 2110.08807, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    8. Phillip Heiler & Michael C. Knaus, 2021. "Effect or Treatment Heterogeneity? Policy Evaluation with Aggregated and Disaggregated Treatments," Papers 2110.01427, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    9. Jason Poulos & Shuxi Zeng, 2021. "RNN‐based counterfactual prediction, with an application to homestead policy and public schooling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1124-1139, August.
    10. Phillip Heiler, 2022. "Efficient Covariate Balancing for the Local Average Treatment Effect," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1569-1582, October.
    11. Zeqi Wu & Meilin Wang & Wei Huang & Zheng Zhang, 2025. "A New and Efficient Debiased Estimation of General Treatment Models by Balanced Neural Networks Weighting," Papers 2507.04044, arXiv.org.
    12. Jacob Dorn, 2025. "How Much Weak Overlap Can Doubly Robust T-Statistics Handle?," Papers 2504.13273, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    13. Kazuhiko Shinoda & Takahiro Hoshino, 2022. "Orthogonal Series Estimation for the Ratio of Conditional Expectation Functions," Papers 2212.13145, arXiv.org.
    14. Youmi Suk & Hyunseung Kang, 2022. "Robust Machine Learning for Treatment Effects in Multilevel Observational Studies Under Cluster-level Unmeasured Confounding," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 310-343, March.
    15. Qingyuan Zhao & Dylan S. Small & Ashkan Ertefaie, 2022. "Selective inference for effect modification via the lasso," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(2), pages 382-413, April.
    16. Zhichao Jiang & Shu Yang & Peng Ding, 2022. "Multiply robust estimation of causal effects under principal ignorability," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1423-1445, September.
    17. Guido Imbens & Yiqing Xu, 2024. "Comparing Experimental and Nonexperimental Methods: What Lessons Have We Learned Four Decades After LaLonde (1986)?," Papers 2406.00827, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    18. Rahul Singh & Liyang Sun, 2024. "Double robustness for complier parameters and a semi-parametric test for complier characteristics," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 27(1), pages 1-20.
    19. Ruoxuan Xiong & Allison Koenecke & Michael Powell & Zhu Shen & Joshua T. Vogelstein & Susan Athey, 2021. "Federated Causal Inference in Heterogeneous Observational Data," Papers 2107.11732, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    20. Jelena Bradic & Weijie Ji & Yuqian Zhang, 2021. "High-dimensional Inference for Dynamic Treatment Effects," Papers 2110.04924, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:28:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.