IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v13y2025i1p18n1001.html

Applying the Causal Roadmap to longitudinal national registry data in Denmark: A case study of second-line diabetes medication and dementia

Author

Listed:
  • Nance Nerissa

    (Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA)

  • Mertens Andrew

    (Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA)

  • Gerds Thomas Alexander

    (Department of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Wang Zeyi

    (Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA)

  • Torp-Pedersen Christian

    (Department of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • van der Laan Mark

    (Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA)

  • Kvist Kajsa

    (Innovative Medical Evidence Generation (IMEG), Novo Nordisk, A/S, Søborg, Denmark)

  • Lange Theis

    (Department of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Zareini Bochra

    (Department of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Petersen Maya L.

    (Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA)

Abstract

The Causal Roadmap is a formal framework for causal and statistical inference that supports clear specification of the causal question, interpretable and transparent statement of required causal assumptions, robust inference, and optimal precision. The Roadmap is thus particularly well suited to evaluating longitudinal causal effects using large-scale registries; however, application of the Roadmap to registry data also introduces particular challenges. In this article, we provide a detailed case study of the longitudinal Causal Roadmap applied to the Danish National Registry to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of second-line diabetes drugs on dementia risk. Specifically, we evaluate the difference in counterfactual 5-year cumulative risk of dementia if a target population of adults with type 2 diabetes had initiated and remained on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) (a second-line diabetes drug) compared to a range of active comparator protocols. Time-dependent confounding is accounted for through use of the iterated conditional expectation representation of the longitudinal g-formula as a statistical estimand. Statistical estimation uses longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood, incorporating machine learning. We provide practical guidance on the implementation of the Roadmap using registry data and highlight how rare exposures and outcomes over long-term follow-up can raise challenges for flexible and robust estimators, even in the context of the large sample sizes provided by the registry. We demonstrate how simulations can be used to help address these challenges by supporting careful estimator pre-specification. We find a protective effect of GLP-1RAs compared to some but not all other second-line treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Nance Nerissa & Mertens Andrew & Gerds Thomas Alexander & Wang Zeyi & Torp-Pedersen Christian & van der Laan Mark & Kvist Kajsa & Lange Theis & Zareini Bochra & Petersen Maya L., 2025. "Applying the Causal Roadmap to longitudinal national registry data in Denmark: A case study of second-line diabetes medication and dementia," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:18:n:1001
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2024-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2024-0014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2024-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wright, Marvin N. & Ziegler, Andreas, 2017. "ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 77(i01).
    2. Heejung Bang & James M. Robins, 2005. "Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 962-973, December.
    3. Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2010. "Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Y Cui & E J Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2024. "Selective machine learning of doubly robust functionals," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 111(2), pages 517-535.
    2. Heinisch, Katja & Scaramella, Fabio & Schult, Christoph, 2025. "Assumption errors and forecast accuracy: A partial linear instrumental variable and double machine learning approach," IWH Discussion Papers 6/2025, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    3. Christopher Weyant & Serin Lee & Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, 2026. "Reinforcement Learning-Based Control of Epidemics on Networks of Communities and Correctional Facilities," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 46(2), pages 216-225, February.
    4. Bazyli Czyżewski & Jakub Staniszewski & Joanna Staniszewska & Marta Guth, 2025. "Does Increasing Agricultural Efficiency Contribute to Food Security—Trade‐Offs of Value Addition in Crop Production?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 939-970, November.
    5. Giorgos Foutzopoulos & Nikolaos Pandis & Michail Tsagris, 2024. "Predicting Full Retirement Attainment of NBA Players," Working Papers 2403, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    6. Van Belle, Jente & Guns, Tias & Verbeke, Wouter, 2021. "Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 466-479.
    7. Philipp Bach & Victor Chernozhukov & Malte S. Kurz & Martin Spindler & Sven Klaassen, 2021. "DoubleML -- An Object-Oriented Implementation of Double Machine Learning in R," Papers 2103.09603, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    8. Michael Bucker & Gero Szepannek & Alicja Gosiewska & Przemyslaw Biecek, 2020. "Transparency, Auditability and eXplainability of Machine Learning Models in Credit Scoring," Papers 2009.13384, arXiv.org.
    9. Jian Lu & Raheel Ahmad & Thomas Nguyen & Jeffrey Cifello & Humza Hemani & Jiangyuan Li & Jinguo Chen & Siyi Li & Jing Wang & Achouak Achour & Joseph Chen & Meagan Colie & Ana Lustig & Christopher Dunn, 2022. "Heterogeneity and transcriptome changes of human CD8+ T cells across nine decades of life," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Bennett, Donyetta & Mekelburg, Erik & Strauss, Jack & Williams, T.H., 2024. "Unlocking the black box of sentiment and cryptocurrency: What, which, why, when and how?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Fogliato Riccardo & Oliveira Natalia L. & Yurko Ronald, 2021. "TRAP: a predictive framework for the Assessment of Performance in Trail Running," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 129-143, June.
    12. Michael Schomaker & Christian Heumann, 2020. "When and when not to use optimal model averaging," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 2221-2240, October.
    13. Loh, Wen Wei & Ren, Dongning, 2021. "Data-driven Covariate Selection for Confounding Adjustment by Focusing on the Stability of the Effect Estimator," OSF Preprints yve6u, Center for Open Science.
    14. Vanessa Ress & Eva‐Maria Wild, 2024. "The impact of integrated care on health care utilization and costs in a socially deprived urban area in Germany: A difference‐in‐differences approach within an event‐study framework," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 229-247, February.
    15. Philip Buczak & Andreas Groll & Markus Pauly & Jakob Rehof & Daniel Horn, 2024. "Using sequential statistical tests for efficient hyperparameter tuning," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 108(2), pages 441-460, June.
    16. Lundberg, Ian & Brand, Jennie E. & Jeon, Nanum, 2022. "Researcher reasoning meets computational capacity: Machine learning for social science," SocArXiv s5zc8, Center for Open Science.
    17. Nicole Ellenbach & Anne-Laure Boulesteix & Bernd Bischl & Kristian Unger & Roman Hornung, 2021. "Improved Outcome Prediction Across Data Sources Through Robust Parameter Tuning," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 38(2), pages 212-231, July.
    18. Ma, Shaohui & Fildes, Robert, 2021. "Retail sales forecasting with meta-learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 111-128.
    19. Ian Lundberg, 2024. "The Gap-Closing Estimand: A Causal Approach to Study Interventions That Close Disparities Across Social Categories," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 53(2), pages 507-570, May.
    20. Siri Frisli, 2025. "Semi-supervised self-training for COVID-19 misinformation detection: analyzing Twitter data and alternative news media on Norwegian Twitter," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 1-34, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:18:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.