IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boh/actaub/v15y2012i1p17-30.html

Financial Ratios as Financial Distress Predictors for SME in Czech Republic
[Finanční ukazatele jako faktory predikce finanční tísně pro SME v ČR]

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Adamec

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

Abstract

Constructing models for predicting financial distress of small and medium enterprises requires its own treatment, because these firms differ from large campanies. The aim of this paper is to quantify the predictive power of selected ratios and to develop a statistical model for financial distress. We tested 16 financial ratios and the study relies on observations from 1563 firms. The model obtained by a methodology of conditional logit analysis includes quick liquidity ratio, average receivables collection period, leverage, solvency and interest coverage or debt coverage from current cash flow. The result confirmed that financial distress is closely related with the ability of a firm to pay its debts. Rentability wasn't found as so decive predictor in short period, there is a more complicated relation between rentability and payment capacity. As significant predictor was identified current cash flow (adjusted ordinary profit), which is much closely connected with cash.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Adamec, 2012. "Financial Ratios as Financial Distress Predictors for SME in Czech Republic [Finanční ukazatele jako faktory predikce finanční tísně pro SME v ČR]," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 17-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:15:y:2012:i:1:p:17-30
    DOI: 10.32725/acta.2012.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/doi/10.32725/acta.2012.002.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/doi/10.32725/acta.2012.002.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32725/acta.2012.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 589-609, September.
    2. Ohlson, Ja, 1980. "Financial Ratios And The Probabilistic Prediction Of Bankruptcy," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 109-131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christine V. Zavgren & Michael T. Dugan & James M. Reeve, 1988. "The Association Between Probabilities of Bankruptcy and Market Responses—A Test of Market Anticipation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 27-45, March.
    2. Matthew Smith & Francisco Alvarez, 2022. "Predicting Firm-Level Bankruptcy in the Spanish Economy Using Extreme Gradient Boosting," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 263-295, January.
    3. Lohmann, Christian & Möllenhoff, Steffen, 2023. "How do bankruptcy risk estimations change in time? Empirical evidence from listed US companies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    4. Premachandra, I.M. & Bhabra, Gurmeet Singh & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "DEA as a tool for bankruptcy assessment: A comparative study with logistic regression technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 412-424, March.
    5. Ruey-Ching Hwang & Jhao-Siang Siao & Huimin Chung & C. Chu, 2011. "Assessing bankruptcy prediction models via information content of technical inefficiency," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 263-273, December.
    6. Antonio Davila & George Foster & Xiaobin He & Carlos Shimizu, 2015. "The rise and fall of startups: Creation and destruction of revenue and jobs by young companies," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 6-35, February.
    7. Li, Chunyu & Lou, Chenxin & Luo, Dan & Xing, Kai, 2021. "Chinese corporate distress prediction using LASSO: The role of earnings management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Sanghoon Lee & Keunho Choi & Donghee Yoo, 2020. "Predicting the Insolvency of SMEs Using Technological Feasibility Assessment Information and Data Mining Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Jagjeevan Kanoujiya & Shailesh Rastogi, 2024. "Nexus between efficiency and financial distress of listed firms in India: a comparative study using frontier techniques," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(2), pages 835-866, June.
    10. Richardson, Grant & Taylor, Grantley & Lanis, Roman, 2015. "The impact of financial distress on corporate tax avoidance spanning the global financial crisis: Evidence from Australia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 44-53.
    11. van der Heijden, Hans, 2022. "Predicting industry sectors from financial statements: An illustration of machine learning in accounting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    12. Xavier Brédart & Eric Séverin & David Veganzones, 2021. "Human resources and corporate failure prediction modeling: Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(7), pages 1325-1341, November.
    13. Zhou, Fanyin & Fu, Lijun & Li, Zhiyong & Xu, Jiawei, 2022. "The recurrence of financial distress: A survival analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1100-1115.
    14. Lauren Stagnol, 2015. "Designing a corporate bond index on solvency criteria," EconomiX Working Papers 2015-39, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    15. Łukasz Postek & Michał Thor, 2020. "Modele predykcji bankructwa i ich zastosowanie dla rynku NewConnect," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 109-137.
    16. Matúš Mihalovič, 2018. "Využitie skóringových modelov pri predikcii defaultu ekonomických subjektov v Slovenskej republike [Applicability of Scoring Models in Firms' Default Prediction. The Case of Slovakia]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(6), pages 689-708.
    17. Dimitras, A. I. & Slowinski, R. & Susmaga, R. & Zopounidis, C., 1999. "Business failure prediction using rough sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 263-280, April.
    18. James R. Coakley & Carol E. Brown, 2000. "Artificial neural networks in accounting and finance: modeling issues," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(2), pages 119-144, June.
    19. Lin, Hsiou-Wei William & Lo, Huai-Chun & Wu, Ruei-Shian, 2016. "Modeling default prediction with earnings management," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 306-322.
    20. Clifford S. Asness & Andrea Frazzini & Lasse Heje Pedersen, 2019. "Quality minus junk," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 34-112, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C35 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:15:y:2012:i:1:p:17-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efjcucz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.