IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/journl/v21y2026i1p64-87.html

Comparison Of Logistics Performance Index Development Among Eu Member States

Author

Listed:
  • Jiří FRANEK

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Xénie LUKOSZOVÁ

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Hana ŠTVERKOVÁ

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Zuzana ČVANČAROVÁ

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This paper deals with a performance analysis and classification of EU member states based on their Logistics Performance Index (LPI) published by the World Bank. Our study covers 2010 to 2023 with 117 countries evaluated. The goal is to analyse, classify and compare countries based on their LPI scores using cluster analysis with parametric and non-parametric measures. Parametric measures include the mean LPI score, average growth, and linear trend slope. The focus is especially on the differences between EU member countries. For non-parametric measures, we used the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI). This novel approach uses clustering based on the' long-term development of LPI scores and MPI. The classification highlights three distinct clusters: "Struggling Performers," "Improvers with Moderate Performance," and "Rapid Advancers." The paper confirms that older EU members have mostly stable logistics, but are less influenced by recent growth. It also shows that sustained improvement over time is a key driver of better logistics performance in the newer EU members. In addition, it was found that countries still in the catch-up phase tend to have lower current performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiří FRANEK & Xénie LUKOSZOVÁ & Hana ŠTVERKOVÁ & Zuzana ČVANČAROVÁ, 2026. "Comparison Of Logistics Performance Index Development Among Eu Member States," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 21(1), pages 64-87, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:64-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://magazines.ulbsibiu.ro/eccsf/RePEc/blg/journl/21104franek.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fare, Rolf & Shawna Grosskopf & Mary Norris & Zhongyang Zhang, 1994. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(1), pages 66-83, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Chung-Wei Wang, 2021. "Integration and application of rough sets and data envelopment analysis for assessments of the investment trusts industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 163-194, January.
    2. Gilligan, Daniel O., 1998. "Farm Size, Productivity, And Economic Efficiency: Accounting For Differences In Efficiency Of Farms By Size In Honduras," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20918, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Jan Kluge & Sarah Lappöhn & Kerstin Plank, 2023. "Predictors of TFP growth in European countries," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 109-140, February.
    4. Hu, Jin-Li & Wang, Shih-Chuan & Yeh, Fang-Yu, 2006. "Total-factor water efficiency of regions in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 217-230, December.
    5. Somesh Kumar Mathur, 2005. "Growth Accounting for Some Selected Developing, Newly Industrialized and Developed Nations from 1966-2000: A Data Envelopment Analysis," GE, Growth, Math methods 0510009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Silvia Saravia-Matus & T. S. Amjath-Babu & Sreejith Aravindakshan & Stefan Sieber & Jimmy A. Saravia & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2021. "Can Enhancing Efficiency Promote the Economic Viability of Smallholder Farmers? A Case of Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Liying Zheng & Fangjuan Zhan & Fangrong Ren, 2025. "Carbon Dioxide Emission-Reduction Efficiency in China’s New Energy Vehicle Sector Toward Sustainable Development: Evidence from a Three-Stage Super-Slacks Based-Measure Data Envelopment Analysis Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    9. Cherchye, Laurens & Knox Lovell, C.A. & Moesen, Wim & Van Puyenbroeck, Tom, 2007. "One market, one number? A composite indicator assessment of EU internal market dynamics," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 749-779, April.
    10. Jens J. Krüger, 2020. "Long‐run productivity trends: A global update with a global index," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 1393-1412, November.
    11. Yu-Chuan Chen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang & Tai-Yu Lin, 2023. "Sustainable Development, Government Efficiency, and People’s Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1549-1578, April.
    12. Tai-Hsin Huang & Yi-Huang Chiu & Chih-Ying Mao, 2021. "Imposing Regularity Conditions to Measure Banks’ Productivity Changes in Taiwan Using a Stochastic Approach," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 28(2), pages 273-303, June.
    13. Fu, Xiaolan, 2012. "How does openness affect the importance of incentives for innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 512-523.
    14. Victor Ajayi & Michael Pollitt, 2022. "Changing times - Incentive regulation, corporate reorganisations, and productivity in Great Britain’s gas networks," Working Papers 023, The Productivity Institute.
    15. Manogna R. L. & Aswini Kumar Mishra, 2022. "Agricultural production efficiency of Indian states: Evidence from data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4244-4255, October.
    16. Abad, A. & Ravelojaona, P., 2025. "An unified framework for measuring environmentally-adjusted productivity change: Theoretical basis and empirical illustration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(3), pages 642-654.
    17. Don U.A. Galagedera & Piyadasa Edirisuriya, 2004. "Performance of Indian commercial banks (1995-2002): an application of data envelopment analysis and Malmquist productivity index," Finance 0408006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Chen, Xiaodong & Miao, Zhuang & Wu, Ge & Zhu, Pengyu, 2024. "City-level green growth accounting: Evidence from China's thirteen urban agglomerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    19. Helvoigt, Ted L. & Adams, Darius M., 2009. "A stochastic frontier analysis of technical progress, efficiency change and productivity growth in the Pacific Northwest sawmill industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 280-287, July.
    20. Mari Maté-Sánchez-Val & Antonia Madrid-Guijarro, 2011. "A spatial efficiency index proposal: an empirical application to SMEs productivity," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 47(2), pages 353-371, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:64-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mihaela Herciu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.