IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v32y2015i6p707-720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying DEA–BPN to Enhance the Explanatory Power of Performance Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Hsin‐Pin Fu
  • Tien‐Hsiang Chang
  • Lon‐Fon Shieh
  • Arthur Lin
  • Shang‐Wen Lin

Abstract

A better measurement tool can provide more accurate information to improve the evaluation of performance in terms of operational efficiency. The data envelopment analysis (DEA) method has been widely used for the measurement of performance in retail chain stores. However, if the data utilized in DEA are subject to statistical deviation, observational errors can occur in the measurement of operational efficiency, and the output can be distorted. Moreover, the explanatory power of DEA is relatively weak when analyzing multiple decision‐making units. To address these shortcomings, this paper used the back‐propagation neural network (BPN) in combination with DEA (DEA–BPN) to produce more reliable results. A leading chain of Taiwanese retail outlets selling lifestyle accessories was chosen as the sample to test the performance of the proposed DEA–BPN model. The results of the study verify that the DEA–BPN method is a more reliable tool to measure efficiency in a retail setting. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsin‐Pin Fu & Tien‐Hsiang Chang & Lon‐Fon Shieh & Arthur Lin & Shang‐Wen Lin, 2015. "Applying DEA–BPN to Enhance the Explanatory Power of Performance Measurement," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 707-720, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:32:y:2015:i:6:p:707-720
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2224
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dubelaar, Chris & Bhargava, Mukesh & Ferrarin, David, 2002. "Measuring retail productivity: what really matters?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 417-426, May.
    2. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    3. Keh, Hean Tat & Chu, Singfat, 2003. "Retail productivity and scale economies at the firm level: a DEA approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 75-82, April.
    4. Adler, Nicole & Yazhemsky, Ekaterina, 2010. "Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA-DEA or variable reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 273-284, April.
    5. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tien-Hsiang Chang & Ling-Jing Kao & Tsung-Yin Ou & Hsin-Pin Fu, 2018. "A Hybrid Method to Measure the Operational Performance of Fast Food Chain Stores," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1269-1298, July.
    2. Kyungwan Ko & Meehyang Chang & Eun-Song Bae & Daecheol Kim, 2017. "Efficiency Analysis of Retail Chain Stores in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Manuel Xavier, José & Ferreira Moutinho, Victor & Carrizo Moreira, António, 2015. "An empirical examination of performance in the clothing retailing industry: A case study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 96-105.
    4. Botti, Laurent & Briec, Walter & Cliquet, Gérard, 2009. "Plural forms versus franchise and company-owned systems: A DEA approach of hotel chain performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 566-578, June.
    5. Peyrache, Antonio & Rose, Christiern & Sicilia, Gabriela, 2020. "Variable selection in Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 644-659.
    6. Khatab Alqararah, 2023. "Assessing the robustness of composite indicators: the case of the Global Innovation Index," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Ho, Dong-huyn & Lööf, Hans, 2009. "Creating Innovations, Productivity and Growth - the efficiency of Icelandic firms," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 162, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    8. Oh, Dong-Hyun & Lööf, Hans & Heshmati, Almas, 2009. "The Icelandic Economy: a victim of the financial crisis or simply inefficient?," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 199, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    9. Andor, Mark A. & Parmeter, Christopher & Sommer, Stephan, 2019. "Combining uncertainty with uncertainty to get certainty? Efficiency analysis for regulation purposes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 240-252.
    10. Murilo Wohlgemuth & Carlos Ernani Fries & Ângelo Márcio Oliveira Sant’Anna & Ricardo Giglio & Diego Castro Fettermann, 2020. "Assessment of the technical efficiency of Brazilian logistic operators using data envelopment analysis and one inflated beta regression," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 703-717, March.
    11. Mark Andor & Frederik Hesse, 2014. "The StoNED age: the departure into a new era of efficiency analysis? A monte carlo comparison of StoNED and the “oldies” (SFA and DEA)," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 85-109, February.
    12. Jamal Ouenniche & Skarleth Carrales, 2018. "Assessing efficiency profiles of UK commercial banks: a DEA analysis with regression-based feedback," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 551-587, July.
    13. Perrigot, Rozenn & Barros, Carlos Pestana, 2008. "Technical efficiency of French retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 296-305.
    14. Vincenzo Patrizii & Anna Pettini & Giuliano Resce, 2017. "The Cost of Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 985-1010, September.
    15. Muchen Luo & Yimin Wu, 2022. "Data-Driven Evaluation and Optimisation of Livelihood Improvement Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    16. Mónika-Anetta Alt, 2012. "Measuring Romanian do-it-yourself retail chain’s efficiency during the economic crisis," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 24(1), pages 85-102.
    17. Nataraja, Niranjan R. & Johnson, Andrew L., 2011. "Guidelines for using variable selection techniques in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 662-669, December.
    18. Duzakin, Erkut & Duzakin, Hatice, 2007. "Measuring the performance of manufacturing firms with super slacks based model of data envelopment analysis: An application of 500 major industrial enterprises in Turkey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1412-1432, November.
    19. Dimitris Balios & Nikolaos Eriotis & Alexandra Fragoudaki & Dimitrios Giokas, 2015. "Economic efficiency of Greek retail SMEs in a period of high fluctuations in economic activity: a DEA approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(33), pages 3577-3593, July.
    20. Ikram, Majid & Rafique, Muhammad Zahid & Mohammed, Kamel Si & Waheed, Rida & Ferraz, Diogo, 2023. "Efficient resource utilization of the electricity distribution sector using nonparametric data envelopment analysis and influential factors," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:32:y:2015:i:6:p:707-720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.