IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v103y2022i1p69-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Criminal justice in Indian country: Examining declination rates of tribal cases

Author

Listed:
  • Regina Branton
  • Kimi King
  • Justin Walsh

Abstract

Objective This study examines how U.S. Attorney Offices (USAO) use their declination powers in Indian country (IC) cases, compared to non‐IC cases. Methods We utilize the “National Caseload Data” provided by the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys. These data allow us to identify whether a crime occurred on IC and identify whether the USAO declined to prosecute a case. Further, we examine if and how the passage of the Tribal Law and Order Act (TLOA) affected rates of declination of IC cases. Results The findings indicate that IC cases are significantly more likely to be declined when compared to non‐IC cases. This suggests violence in IC may be linked to the federal government's lack of judicial oversight of criminal cases that occur in IC. Additionally, the findings indicate that the passage of TLOA in 2010 significantly reduced the declination rates in IC. Conclusion The vicious cycle of violence on tribal lands is partially a result of the federal government's lack of judicial oversight of criminal cases that occur in IC. The failure to prosecute IC criminal cases results in perpetuating the occurrence of violent crime in tribal lands.

Suggested Citation

  • Regina Branton & Kimi King & Justin Walsh, 2022. "Criminal justice in Indian country: Examining declination rates of tribal cases," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(1), pages 69-81, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:1:p:69-81
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13100
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvarez, Alexander & Bachman, Ronet D., 1996. "American Indians and sentencing disparity: An Arizona test," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 549-561.
    2. Joshua B. Fischman & Max M. Schanzenbach, 2011. "Do Standards of Review Matter? The Case of Federal Criminal Sentencing," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(2), pages 405-437.
    3. Bruce Western & Christopher Wildeman, 2009. "The Black Family and Mass Incarceration," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 621(1), pages 221-242, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lundberg, Alexander, 2016. "Sentencing discretion and burdens of proof," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 34-42.
    2. Sara Wakefield & Hedwig Lee & Christopher Wildeman, 2016. "Tough on Crime, Tough on Families? Criminal Justice and Family Life in America," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 665(1), pages 8-21, May.
    3. Luck, Anneliese N., 2023. "Variation in cumulative childhood risks of parental imprisonment and foster care removal by state and race/ethnicity," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Das, Aniruddha, 2022. "Childhood police encounters, social isolation and epigenetic age acceleration among older U.S. adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    5. Bontrager Ryon, Stephanie, 2013. "Gender as social threat: A study of offender sex, situational factors, gender dynamics and social control," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 426-437.
    6. Anna Gunderson, 2021. "Ideology, Disadvantage, and Federal District Court Inmate Civil Rights Filings: The Troubling Effects of Pro Se Status," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 603-628, September.
    7. Aliya Saperstein & Andrew M. Penner & Jessica M. Kizer, 2014. "The Criminal Justice System and the Racialization of Perceptions," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 651(1), pages 104-121, January.
    8. Crystal S. Yang, 2015. "Free at Last? Judicial Discretion and Racial Disparities in Federal Sentencing," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(1), pages 75-111.
    9. Greg Goelzhauser, 2024. "Constitutional accountability for police shootings," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 92-108, March.
    10. Alessandra Foresta, 2022. "Lady Justice: The impact of female judges on trials' verdicts in US," Discussion Papers 22/04, Department of Economics, University of York.
    11. Simons, Ronald L. & Ong, Mei Ling & Lei, Man-Kit & Klopach, Eric & Berg, Mark & Zhang, Yue & Philibert, Robert & Gibbons, Frederick X. & Beach, Steven R.H., 2022. "Shifts in lifestyle and socioeconomic circumstances predict change—for better or worse—in speed of epigenetic aging: A study of middle-aged black women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    12. Bruce Western & Christopher Muller, 2013. "Mass Incarceration, Macrosociology, and the Poor," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 647(1), pages 166-189, May.
    13. Joshua B. Fischman & Max M. Schanzenbach, 2012. "Racial Disparities Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimums," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 729-764, December.
    14. Zhao, Qianwei & Parrish, Danielle & He, Ning, 2023. "Maternal incarceration and adolescent girls’ risk of substance-exposed pregnancy, STIs, and HIV," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    15. Lim, Claire S.H. & Snyder, James M., 2015. "Is more information always better? Party cues and candidate quality in U.S. judicial elections," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 107-123.
    16. Andrea N. Montes & Danielle Wallace & Chantal Fahmy & Abigail Henson & Alyssa W. Chamberlain & Leah A. Jacobs, 2021. "An Assessment of Prisoner Reentry, Legal Financial Obligations and Family Financial Support: A Focus on Fathers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-17, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:1:p:69-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.