IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v37y2020i3p412-438.html

A 21st Century Low‐Carbon Transition in U.S. Electric Power: Extent, Contributing Factors, and Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Brian C. Murray
  • William H. Niver

Abstract

The U.S. electric power sector has experienced a substantial shift of the generation mix since the turn of the century, moving from heavy reliance on coal‐powered generation to one drawing more from natural gas and, more recently, renewables. This transition has been forged by a mix of macroeconomic factors (recession and recovery); technological breakthroughs (horizontal drilling coupled with hydraulic fracturing; improvements in natural gas plant efficiency); clean energy policies at federal, state, and local levels of government; and private sector demands for carbon‐free energy sources. These factors have combined to reduce carbon emissions from electric power generation substantially this century. In this article we examine the extent of this transition, its causes, as well as the distinct American institutional factors steering it, including energy and environmental federalism, electoral politics, and the political economy of clean energy policy enactment and resistance. 美国电力部门自本世纪开始便经历了电力生产组合的实质性转变，从严重依赖燃煤发电转变到更多地使用天然气，以及近几年开始的可再生能源发电。宏观经济因素（经济衰退与恢复）、技术突破（水平钻井加上水力压裂、天然气厂效率提升）、联邦、州级和地方政府的清洁能源政策、以及私人部门对零碳能源的需求，这一切的组合共同形成了该能源转型。这些因素大幅减少了本世纪电力生产的碳排放。本文中我们检验了能源转型的程度、起因、以及引导该转型的独特美国制度因素，包括能源与环境联邦主义、选举政治、以及与清洁能源政策采纳与抵制相关的政治经济 El sector de la energía eléctrica de EE. UU. Ha experimentado un cambio sustancial en la mezcla de generación desde el cambio de siglo, pasando de una gran dependencia de la generación a carbón a una que utiliza más gas natural y, más recientemente, energías renovables. Esta transición ha sido forjada por una combinación de factores macroeconómicos (recesión y recuperación), avances tecnológicos (perforación horizontal junto con fracturación hidráulica, mejoras en la eficiencia de la planta de gas natural), políticas de energía limpia a nivel de gobierno federal, estatal y local, y privado. demandas del sector de fuentes de energía libres de carbono. Estos factores se han combinado para reducir las emisiones de carbono de la generación de energía eléctrica sustancialmente este siglo. En este artículo examinamos el alcance de esta transición, sus causas, así como los distintos factores institucionales estadounidenses que la dirigen, incluido el federalismo energético y ambiental, la política electoral y la economía política de la promulgación y resistencia de políticas de energía limpia.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian C. Murray & William H. Niver, 2020. "A 21st Century Low‐Carbon Transition in U.S. Electric Power: Extent, Contributing Factors, and Implications," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(3), pages 412-438, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:37:y:2020:i:3:p:412-438
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12388
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyungjin Yoo & Seth Blumsack, 2018. "Can capacity markets be designed by democracy?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 127-151, April.
    2. Pillai, Unni, 2015. "Drivers of cost reduction in solar photovoltaics," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 286-293.
    3. Jenkins, Jesse D., 2014. "Political economy constraints on carbon pricing policies: What are the implications for economic efficiency, environmental efficacy, and climate policy design?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 467-477.
    4. Richard Schmalensee & Robert N. Stavins, 2025. "Policy Evolution under the Clean Air Act," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Economics of Environment, Climate Change, and Wine Selected Papers of Robert N Stavins Volume 3 (2011–2023), chapter 10, pages 267-298, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Cronshaw, Ian & Grafton, R. Quentin, 2016. "Economic benefits, external costs and the regulation of unconventional gas in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 180-186.
    6. Brian C. Murray & Maureen L. Cropper & Francisco C. de la Chesnaye & John M. Reilly, 2014. "How Effective Are US Renewable Energy Subsidies in Cutting Greenhouse Gases?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 569-574, May.
    7. Paine, Nathan & Homans, Frances R. & Pollak, Melisa & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Wilson, Elizabeth J., 2014. "Why market rules matter: Optimizing pumped hydroelectric storage when compensation rules differ," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 10-19.
    8. Brian C. Murray & Peter T. Maniloff & Evan M. Murray, 2015. "Why Have Greenhouse Emissions in RGGI States Declined? An Econometric Attribution to Economic, Energy Market and Policy Factors (Payne Institute Policy Brief)," Payne Institute Policy Briefs 2014-04, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    9. Taylor, Margaret, 2008. "Beyond technology-push and demand-pull: Lessons from California's solar policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 2829-2854, November.
    10. Christoph H. Stefes & Carol Hager, 2020. "Resistance to Energy Transitions," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(3), pages 286-291, May.
    11. Murray, Brian C. & Maniloff, Peter T., 2015. "Why have greenhouse emissions in RGGI states declined? An econometric attribution to economic, energy market, and policy factors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 581-589.
    12. Stokes, Leah C. & Breetz, Hanna L., 2018. "Politics in the U.S. energy transition: Case studies of solar, wind, biofuels and electric vehicles policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 76-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiali Li & Weiqun Han & Muhammad Aamir Mahmood, 2025. "Strategies for sustainable urban development: Assessing the impact of adaptation readiness, nanotechnology, and renewable energy on urban ecosystems," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(3), pages 2536-2560, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafaty, Ryan & Dolphin, Geoffroy & Pretis, Felix, 2025. "Carbon pricing and the elasticity of CO2 emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Ryan Rafaty & Geoffroy Dolphin & Felix Pretis, 2020. "Carbon pricing and the elasticity of CO2 emissions," Working Papers EPRG2035, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    3. Jiang, Kai & Yan, Xiaohe & Liu, Nian & Wang, Peng, 2022. "Energy trade-offs in coupled ICM and electricity market under dynamic carbon emission intensity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Toshi H. Arimura & Tatsuya Abe, 2021. "The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: what factor contributed to the emission reduction?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(3), pages 517-533, July.
    5. David M. Newbery & David M. Reiner & Robert A. Ritz, 2019. "The Political Economy of a Carbon Price Floor for Power Generation," The Energy Journal, , vol. 40(1), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Bauckloh, Michael Tobias & Klein, Christian & Pioch, Thomas & Schiemann, Frank, 2022. "Under pressure: The link between mandatory climate reporting and firms' carbon performance," CFR Working Papers 22-01, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    7. Emanuel Kohlscheen & Richhild Moessner & Elod Takáts, 2021. "Effects of Carbon Pricing and Other Climate Policies on CO2 Emissions," CESifo Working Paper Series 9347, CESifo.
    8. Lin, Weizheng & Wang, Chih-Wei & Li, Ying-Jie & Chen, Jian-Yun, 2025. "From green to digital: Exploring the role of ecological footprints on cybersecurity risk," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Abe, Tatsuya & Arimura, Toshi H., 2022. "Causal effects of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on energy consumption and economic performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Mitsutsugu Hamamoto, 2019. "Impact of the Saitama Prefecture Target-Setting Emissions Trading Program on the Adoption of Low-Carbon Technology," RIEEM Discussion Paper Series 1909, Research Institute for Environmental Economics and Management, Waseda University.
    11. Muñoz, Francisco D. & Suazo-Martínez, Carlos & Pereira, Eduardo & Moreno, Rodrigo, 2021. "Electricity market design for low-carbon and flexible systems: Room for improvement in Chile," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    12. Best, Rohan & Zhang, Qiu Yue, 2020. "What explains carbon-pricing variation between countries?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    13. Chunhua Lu & Hong Li, 2023. "Have China’s Regional Carbon Emissions Trading Schemes Promoted Industrial Resource Allocation Efficiency? The Evidence from Heavily Polluted Industries at the Provincial Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Mitsutsugu Hamamoto, 2021. "Impact of the Saitama Prefecture Target-Setting Emissions Trading Program on the adoption of low-carbon technology," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(3), pages 501-515, July.
    15. Downar, Benedict & Ernstberger, Jürgen & Reichelstein, Stefan & Schwenen, Sebastian & Zaklan, Aleksandar, 2021. "The impact of carbon disclosure mandates on emissions and financial operating performance," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(3), pages 1137-1175.
    16. Lee, Kangil & Melstrom, Richard T., 2018. "Evidence of increased electricity influx following the regional greenhouse gas initiative," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 127-135.
    17. Chen, Xing & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Towards carbon neutrality by implementing carbon emissions trading scheme: Policy evaluation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Alatorre, José Eduardo & Peres Núñez, Wilson & Bárcena Ibarra, Alicia & Samaniego, Joseluis, 2020. "The climate emergency in Latin America and the Caribbean: The path ahead – resignation or action?," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 45678 edited by Eclac, July.
    19. Sadayuki, Taisuke & Arimura, Toshi H., 2021. "Do regional emission trading schemes lead to carbon leakage within firms? Evidence from Japan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    20. Ling Huang & Yishu Zhou, 2019. "Carbon Prices and Fuel Switching: A Quasi-experiment in Electricity Markets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 53-98, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:37:y:2020:i:3:p:412-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.