IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v37y2020i1p115-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance Arrangements for Transboundary Issues: Lessons from the Food Waste Programs of Italian Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Stella Righettini
  • Renata Lizzi

Abstract

Focusing on transboundary issues contributes to highlighting how new governance modes can emerge from increasing interdependence and complexity in public policies. This article analyzes food waste as a transboundary issue that cuts across different policy subsystems (PSs), intersects multiple levels of government, and calls into question consolidated policy making for new modes of governance. The analytical framework provides a multidimensional approach and a new typology of governance arrangements to be used in empirical research. Evidence from an Italian case study and an empirical investigation of 20 regional food waste programs shows that regions can adopt different driving ideas and can activate a variety of governance arrangements and differentiated, as well as viable, modes of integration between consolidated PSs. The article argues that different tool mixes combined with different levels of governance complexity may lead to a variety of governance arrangements and a differentiated likelihood of policy integration. 跨边界问题的治理安排：意大利地区粮食浪费计划得出的经验 聚焦跨边界问题有助于强调新治理模式如何从公共政策日益增加的相互依赖性和复杂性中应运而生。本文将粮食浪费作为一种跨边界问题进行分析，该问题贯穿不同政策子系统（PSs）、涉及多重政府层面、质疑新治理模式的整合决策。分析框架提出一项多方面措施和一种有关治理安排的新类型学，以用于实证研究。由一项意大利案例研究和一项针对20个地区粮食浪费计划的实证研究得出的证据表明，地区能采纳不同的驱动性观念，激活一系列治理安排，在整合过的政策子系统之间进行可行的差异化融合。本文主张，不同工具的组合，结合不同程度的治理复杂性，可能导致一系列治理安排和差异化的政策整合。 Disposiciones de gobernanza para asuntos transfronterizos: lecciones de los programas de desperdicio de alimentos de las regiones italianas Centrarse en cuestiones transfronterizas contribuye a destacar cómo pueden surgir nuevos modos de gobernanza a partir de la creciente interdependencia y complejidad dentro de las políticas públicas. Este artículo analiza el desperdicio de alimentos como un problema transfronterizo que atraviesa diferentes subsistemas de políticas, se cruza en múltiples niveles de gobierno y cuestiona la formulación de políticas consolidadas para nuevas formas de gobierno. El marco analítico proporciona un enfoque multidimensional y una nueva tipología de acuerdo de gobernanza para ser utilizados en la investigación empírica. La evidencia de un estudio de caso italiano y una investigación empírica de 20 programas regionales de desperdicio de alimentos muestran que las regiones pueden adoptar diferentes ideas de gestión y pueden activar una variedad de ajustes de gobernanza. El artículo argumenta que diferentes combinaciones de herramientas multiples con diferentes niveles de complejidad de gobernanza pueden conducir a una variedad de ajustes y una probabilidad diferenciada de integración de políticas.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Stella Righettini & Renata Lizzi, 2020. "Governance Arrangements for Transboundary Issues: Lessons from the Food Waste Programs of Italian Regions," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(1), pages 115-134, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:37:y:2020:i:1:p:115-134
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12360
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Pollitt, 2003. "Joined‐up Government: a Survey," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 1(1), pages 34-49, January.
    2. Abbott, Kenneth W. & Genschel, Philipp & Snidal, Duncan & Zangl, Bernhard, 2016. "Two Logics of Indirect Governance: Delegation and Orchestration," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(4), pages 719-729, October.
    3. Daniel Henstra, 2017. "Climate Adaptation in Canada: Governing a Complex Policy Regime," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 34(3), pages 378-399, June.
    4. Susana Borrás & Jacint Jordana, 2016. "When regional innovation policies meet policy rationales and evidence: a plea for policy analysis," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 2133-2153, December.
    5. Elizabeth Schwartz, 2019. "Autonomous Local Climate Change Policy: An Analysis of the Effect of Intergovernmental Relations Among Subnational Governments," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 36(1), pages 50-74, January.
    6. Michael Howlett, 2009. "Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(1), pages 73-89, February.
    7. John Mawson & Stephen Hall, 2000. "Joining It Up Locally? Area Regeneration and Holistic Government in England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 67-74.
    8. Richards, Timothy J. & Hamilton, Stephen F., 2018. "Food waste in the sharing economy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 109-123.
    9. Michael Howlett & Jeremy Rayner, 2013. "Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 170-182.
    10. Andreas Endl, 2017. "Addressing “Wicked Problems” through Governance for Sustainable Development—A Comparative Analysis of National Mineral Policy Approaches in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Federico Cuomo, 2022. "Urban Living Lab: An Experimental Co-Production Tool to Foster the Circular Economy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dayashankar Maurya, 2019. "Understanding public health insurance in India: A design perspective," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1633-1650, October.
    2. Michael Howlett & Ishani Mukherjee, 2014. "Policy Design and Non-Design: Towards a Spectrum of Policy Formulation Types," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(2), pages 57-71.
    3. Lorenz Kammermann & Karin Ingold, 2019. "Going beyond technocratic and democratic principles: stakeholder acceptance of instruments in Swiss energy policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(1), pages 43-65, March.
    4. Rudoler, David & Peckham, Allie & Grudniewicz, Agnes & Marchildon, Greg, 2019. "Coordinating primary care services: A case of policy layering," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 215-221.
    5. Shyu, Chian-Woei, 2024. "Referendum as a policy instrument to enhance energy democracy in formulating energy transition path, agenda, and policies: A case study of Taiwan's referendums in 2018 and 2021," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Malhotra, Abhishek, 2022. "Trade-offs and synergies in power sector policy mixes: The case of Uttar Pradesh, India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Ishani Mukherjee, 2021. "Rethinking the procedural in policy instrument ‘Compounds’: a renewable energy policy perspective [Introducing vertical policy coordination to comparative policy analysis: The missing link between ," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 312-332.
    8. Michael Howlett, 2014. "From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 47(3), pages 187-207, September.
    9. Acciai, Claudia, 2021. "The politics of research and innovation: Understanding instrument choices in complex governance environments – the case of France and Italy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    10. Ishani Mukherjee & M. Kerem Coban & Azad Singh Bali, 2021. "Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(2), pages 243-268, June.
    11. María José Dorado-Rubín & María José Guerrero-Mayo & Clemente Jesús Navarro-Yáñez, 2021. "Integrality in the Design of Urban Development Plans. Analysis of the Initiatives Promoted by the EU in Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Marijn T. Geet & Stefan Verweij & Tim Busscher & Jos Arts, 2021. "The importance of policy design fit for effectiveness: a qualitative comparative analysis of policy integration in regional transport planning," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 629-662, September.
    13. Michael Howlett & Pablo del Rio, 2015. "The parameters of policy portfolios: verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(5), pages 1233-1245, October.
    14. David Valler & David Betteley, 2001. "The Politics of 'Integrated' Local Policy in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2393-2413, December.
    15. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    16. Caloffi, Annalisa & Freo, Marzia & Ghinoi, Stefano & Mariani, Marco & Rossi, Federica, 2022. "Assessing the effects of a deliberate policy mix: The case of technology and innovation advisory services and innovation vouchers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    17. Giliberto Capano & Andrea Lippi, 2017. "How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers’ choices," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 269-293, June.
    18. Fleck, Ann-Katrin & Anatolitis, Vasilios, 2023. "Achieving the objectives of renewable energy policy – Insights from renewable energy auction design in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Caner Bakir, 2017. "How can interactions among interdependent structures, institutions, and agents inform financial stability? What we have still to learn from global financial crisis," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 217-239, June.
    20. Pangbourne, Kate & Mladenović, Miloš N. & Stead, Dominic & Milakis, Dimitris, 2020. "Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 35-49.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:37:y:2020:i:1:p:115-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.