IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v29y2025i4p2534-2549.html

Green Aid and Environmental Quality in Developing Countries: The Role of Donor‐Recipient Institutional Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Pinar

Abstract

Green aid aims to increase the capacity of countries to mitigate the impacts of climate change by improving energy efficiency and deploying green and renewable energy technologies in developing countries. While various donor and recipient country characteristics for the effectiveness of foreign aid have been examined, the role of donor‐recipient institutional quality proximity has not been investigated. This paper analyzes the role of donor‐recipient institutional quality proximity for the effectiveness of green aid in improving environmental quality in developing countries using bilateral green aid flows from 29 donors to 97 recipient countries between 2002 and 2018. The findings demonstrate that green aid improves environmental quality; however, the effectiveness of green aid decreases when the donor‐recipient institutional quality differences increase. Aid allocation that considers donor‐recipient institutional quality differences could enhance the effectiveness of green aid in improving environmental quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Pinar, 2025. "Green Aid and Environmental Quality in Developing Countries: The Role of Donor‐Recipient Institutional Differences," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 2534-2549, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:4:p:2534-2549
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.13239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13239
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.13239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Jongmoo Jay & Lee, Sang Mook & Shoham, Amir, 2016. "The effects of institutional distance on FDI inflow: General environmental institutions (GEI) versus minority investor protection institutions (MIP)," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 114-123.
    2. Liu, Ailan & Lu, Cuicui & Wang, Zhixuan, 2020. "The roles of cultural and institutional distance in international trade: Evidence from China's trade with the Belt and Road countries," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. Liou, Ru-Shiun & Rao-Nicholson, Rekha, 2017. "Out of Africa: The role of institutional distance and host-home colonial tie in South African Firms’ post-acquisition performance in developed economies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1184-1195.
    4. Dikova, Desislava & Panibratov, Andrei & Veselova, Anna, 2019. "Investment motives, ownership advantages and institutional distance: An examination of Russian cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 625-637.
    5. Mehmet Pinar, 2015. "Measuring world governance: revisiting the institutions hypothesis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 747-778, March.
    6. Nicholas Apergis & Mehmet Pinar & Emre Unlu, 2024. "Does classification of green aid flows matter for environmental quality?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 53-73, January.
    7. Elisabeth Paul & Frieda Vandeninden, 2012. "Foreign Aid Transaction Costs: What Are They and When Are They Minimised?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 30(3), pages 283-304, May.
    8. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    9. Dang, Hai-Anh & Knack, Stephen & Rogers, F. Halsey, 2013. "International aid and financial crises in donor countries," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 232-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahsan, Faisal Mohammad & Popli, Manish & Kumar, Vikas, 2024. "Formal institutions and cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A systematic literature review and research agenda," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5).
    2. Raghavendra, Chandrika & Yadav, Miklesh Prasad & Sharif, Taimur & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2025. "Does human flight and brain drain affect cross-border acquisitions? Insights into tobit and binomial regression models," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Rekha Rao-Nicholson & Liudmyla Svystunova, 2020. "Assessing the Role of Host Country Human Rights Protection on Multinational Enterprises’ Choice of Investment Strategy," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 177-209, April.
    4. Osuji, Juliet & Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Tupper, Christina, 2024. "Escaping the stigma of firm operations in emerging markets: Are you willing to pay the price?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Nugent, Jeffrey B. & Lu, Jiaxuan, 2021. "China's outward foreign direct investment in the Belt and Road Initiative: What are the motives for Chinese firms to invest?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Siman Xie & Muhammad Farhan Bashir, 2024. "Institutional differences, state ownership and financing decisions: Evidence from Chinese cross‐border mergers and acquisitions," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 309-338, December.
    7. Chandrika Raghavendra & Rampilla Mahesh & Muhammad Kamran Khan & Vishal Dagar & Sanjeet Singh & Rafael Alvarado, 2025. "Impact of carbon emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on inbound cross-border mergers and acquisition’s investment inflow," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 14123-14142, June.
    8. Arsani Alina & Stefan George, 2024. "Energy Transition and European Sub-Models. Restructuring EU Economy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Paradigm, vol. 18(1), pages 86-101.
    9. Xiaoqing Lin & Chunyan Lu & Kaishan Song & Ying Su & Yifan Lei & Lianxiu Zhong & Yibin Gao, 2020. "Analysis of Coupling Coordination Variance between Urbanization Quality and Eco-Environment Pressure: A Case Study of the West Taiwan Strait Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Dongqing Han & Dayong Zhang & Peng Yue & Zhengxu Cao, 2024. "Toward Sustainable Development: Can Digital Transformation of Industrial Enterprise Drive Carbon Reduction?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Fatima Zahra Moussaid & Hikma Bachegour & Mounir Jerry & Ahlam Qafas, 2025. "Probing the asymmetric impact of clean energy technologies on environmental quality: testing load capacity curve hypothesis in Spain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4425-4444, February.
    12. Fujii, Hidemichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2013. "Which industry is greener? An empirical study of nine industries in OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 381-388.
    13. Pantelis Kalaitzidakis & Theofanis P. Mamuneas & Thanasis Stengos, 2008. "The Contribution of Pollution to Productivity Growth," Working Paper series 06_08, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    14. Song, Tao & Zheng, Tingguo & Tong, Lianjun, 2008. "An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 381-392, September.
    15. Giedrė Lapinskienė & Kęstutis Peleckis & Neringa Slavinskaitė, 2017. "Energy consumption, economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union countries," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 1082-1097, November.
    16. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    17. Halldén, Filip & Hultberg, Anna & Ahmed, Ali & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Yahya, Muhammad & Troster, Victor, 2025. "The role of institutional quality on public renewable energy investments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    18. Waqas Shair & Shaher Bano & Haleema Afzal & Badar-un-Nisa, 2024. "Demographic and Socioeconomic Determinants of Environmental Prioritization over Economic Growth," Journal of Social Sciences Advancement, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 5(4), pages 115-123.
    19. Choramo, Tekilu Tadesse & Abafita, Jemal & Gandica, Yerali & Rocha, Luis E.C., 2026. "Trade integration, institutions, and environmental quality in Africa: Network-based approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    20. Fan, Zhenqi & Cui, Jie & Wu, Wenjing, 2026. "Spatial spillover effect of green credit on carbon emission intensity in China: The role of high-quality productive forces," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:4:p:2534-2549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.