IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v69y2020i5p1067-1090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Burglary in London: insights from statistical heterogeneous spatial point processes

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Povala
  • Seppo Virtanen
  • Mark Girolami

Abstract

To obtain operational insights regarding the crime of burglary in London, we consider the estimation of the effects of covariates on the intensity of spatial point patterns. Inspired by localized properties of criminal behaviour, we propose a spatial extension to mixtures of generalized linear models from the mixture modelling literature. The Bayesian model proposed is a finite mixture of Poisson generalized linear models such that each location is probabilistically assigned to one of the groups. Each group is characterized by the regression coefficients, which we subsequently use to interpret the localized effects of the covariates. By using a blocks structure of the study region, our approach enables specifying spatial dependence between nearby locations. We estimate the proposed model by using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods and we provide a Python implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Povala & Seppo Virtanen & Mark Girolami, 2020. "Burglary in London: insights from statistical heterogeneous spatial point processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1067-1090, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:69:y:2020:i:5:p:1067-1090
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12431
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen Fernández & Peter J. Green, 2002. "Modelling spatially correlated data via mixtures: a Bayesian approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 805-826, October.
    2. Gelfand A.E. & Kim H-J. & Sirmans C.F. & Banerjee S., 2003. "Spatial Modeling With Spatially Varying Coefficient Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 387-396, January.
    3. Jesper Møller & Rasmus P. Waagepetersen, 2007. "Modern Statistics for Spatial Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(4), pages 643-684, December.
    4. Taddy, Matthew A., 2010. "Autoregressive Mixture Models for Dynamic Spatial Poisson Processes: Application to Tracking Intensity of Violent Crime," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(492), pages 1403-1417.
    5. Mark Girolami & Ben Calderhead, 2011. "Riemann manifold Langevin and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(2), pages 123-214, March.
    6. Danilo Alvares & Carmen Armero & Anabel Forte, 2018. "What Does Objective Mean in a Dirichlet†multinomial Process?," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 86(1), pages 106-118, April.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4648 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Green P.J. & Richardson S., 2002. "Hidden Markov Models and Disease Mapping," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 1055-1070, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vidal Rodeiro, Carmen L. & Lawson, Andrew B., 2005. "An evaluation of the edge effects in disease map modelling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 45-62, April.
    2. Mike Tsionas & Marwan Izzeldin & Lorenzo Trapani, 2019. "Bayesian estimation of large dimensional time varying VARs using copulas," Papers 1912.12527, arXiv.org.
    3. Luc Anselin & Pedro Amaral, 2024. "Endogenous spatial regimes," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 209-234, April.
    4. Tsionas, Mike G. & Izzeldin, Marwan & Trapani, Lorenzo, 2022. "Estimation of large dimensional time varying VARs using copulas," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Atkinson, Scott E. & Tsionas, Mike G., 2021. "Generalized estimation of productivity with multiple bad outputs: The importance of materials balance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1165-1186.
    6. Jia Liu & John M. Maheu & Yong Song, 2024. "Identification and forecasting of bull and bear markets using multivariate returns," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(5), pages 723-745, August.
    7. Dimitrakopoulos, Stefanos & Tsionas, Mike, 2019. "Ordinal-response GARCH models for transaction data: A forecasting exercise," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1273-1287.
    8. Michaela Prokešová & Eva Jensen, 2013. "Asymptotic Palm likelihood theory for stationary point processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(2), pages 387-412, April.
    9. Vanhatalo, Jarno & Veneranta, Lari & Hudd, Richard, 2012. "Species distribution modeling with Gaussian processes: A case study with the youngest stages of sea spawning whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L. s.l.) larvae," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 49-58.
    10. Will Penny & Biswa Sengupta, 2016. "Annealed Importance Sampling for Neural Mass Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Spezia, L. & Cooksley, S.L. & Brewer, M.J. & Donnelly, D. & Tree, A., 2014. "Modelling species abundance in a river by Negative Binomial hidden Markov models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 599-614.
    12. Hui Ding & Mei Yao & Riquan Zhang, 2023. "A new estimation in functional linear concurrent model with covariate dependent and noise contamination," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 86(8), pages 965-989, November.
    13. Zhengyi Zhou & David S. Matteson & Dawn B. Woodard & Shane G. Henderson & Athanasios C. Micheas, 2015. "A Spatio-Temporal Point Process Model for Ambulance Demand," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 6-15, March.
    14. Zarezadeh Zakarya & Costantini Giovanni, 2019. "Particle diffusion Monte Carlo (PDMC)," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 25(2), pages 121-130, June.
    15. Michael L. Polemis & Mike G. Tsionas, 2019. "Bayesian nonlinear panel cointegration: an empirical application to the EKC hypothesis," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 113-120, August.
    16. Agudze, Komla M. & Billio, Monica & Casarin, Roberto & Ravazzolo, Francesco, 2022. "Markov switching panel with endogenous synchronization effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 281-298.
    17. Arnak S. Dalalyan, 2017. "Theoretical guarantees for approximate sampling from smooth and log-concave densities," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(3), pages 651-676, June.
    18. Tsionas, Mike G. & Izzeldin, Marwan, 2018. "Smooth approximations to monotone concave functions in production analysis: An alternative to nonparametric concave least squares," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 797-807.
    19. Hu, Guanyu, 2021. "Spatially varying sparsity in dynamic regression models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 23-34.
    20. Luigi Spezia, 2019. "Modelling covariance matrices by the trigonometric separation strategy with application to hidden Markov models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 399-422, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:69:y:2020:i:5:p:1067-1090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.