IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v58y2009i3p405-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Space–time modelling of precipitation by using a hidden Markov model and censored Gaussian distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Ailliot
  • Craig Thompson
  • Peter Thomson

Abstract

Summary. A new hidden Markov model for the space–time evolution of daily rainfall is developed which models precipitation within hidden regional weather types by censored power‐transformed Gaussian distributions. The latter provide flexible and interpretable multivariate models for the mixed discrete–continuous variables that describe both precipitation, when it occurs, and no precipitation. Parameter estimation is performed by using a Monte Carlo EM algorithm whose use and performance are evaluated by simulation studies. The model is fitted to rainfall data from a small network of stations in New Zealand encompassing a diverse range of orographic effects. The results that are obtained show that the marginal distributions and spatial structure of the data are well described by the fitted model which provides a better description of the spatial structure of precipitation than a standard hidden Markov model that is commonly used in the literature. However, the fitted model, like the standard hidden Markov model, cannot fully reproduce the local dynamics and underestimates the lag 1 auto‐correlations.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Ailliot & Craig Thompson & Peter Thomson, 2009. "Space–time modelling of precipitation by using a hidden Markov model and censored Gaussian distributions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(3), pages 405-426, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:58:y:2009:i:3:p:405-426
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2008.00654.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2008.00654.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2008.00654.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hajivassiliou, Vassilis & McFadden, Daniel & Ruud, Paul, 1996. "Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives theoretical and computational results," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1-2), pages 85-134.
    2. David J. Allcroft & Chris A. Glasbey, 2003. "A latent Gaussian Markov random‐field model for spatiotemporal rainfall disaggregation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(4), pages 487-498, October.
    3. J. P. Hughes & P Guttorp & S. P. Charles, 1999. "A non‐homogeneous hidden Markov model for precipitation occurrence," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 48(1), pages 15-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gregory P. Bopp & Benjamin A. Shaby & Chris E. Forest & Alfonso Mejía, 2020. "Projecting Flood-Inducing Precipitation with a Bayesian Analogue Model," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(2), pages 229-249, June.
    2. Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Okhrin, Ostap & Wang, Weining, 2012. "HMM in dynamic HAC models," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2012-001, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    3. Francesco Bartolucci & Alessio Farcomeni, 2022. "A hidden Markov space–time model for mapping the dynamics of global access to food," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 246-266, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    2. Haaijer, Marinus E., 1996. "Predictions in conjoint choice experiments : the x-factor probit model," Research Report 96B22, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    3. Park, Cheolsung & Kang, Changhui, 2008. "Does education induce healthy lifestyle?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1516-1531, December.
    4. Geweke, J. & Joel Horowitz & Pesaran, M.H., 2006. "Econometrics: A Bird’s Eye View," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0655, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    5. Oleksandr Zhylyevskyy, 2012. "Spousal Conflict and Divorce," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(4), pages 915-962.
    6. Klaassen, F.J.G.M. & Magnus, J.R., 2006. "Are Economic Agents Successful Optimizers? An Analysis Through Strategy in Tennis," Other publications TiSEM 73e12d86-8fe4-4a87-9181-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Caamaño-Carrillo, Christian & Bevilacqua, Moreno & López, Cristian & Morales-Oñate, Víctor, 2024. "Nearest neighbors weighted composite likelihood based on pairs for (non-)Gaussian massive spatial data with an application to Tukey-hh random fields estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Maruyama, Shiko, 2014. "Estimation of finite sequential games," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 716-726.
    9. Falk Bräuning & Siem Jan Koopman, 2016. "The dynamic factor network model with an application to global credit risk," Working Papers 16-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    10. Daniel McFadden, 2001. "Economic Choices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 351-378, June.
    11. Céline Bignebat & Fabian Gouret, 2008. "Determinants and consequences of soft budget constraints. An empirical analysis using enterprise-level data in transition countries," Post-Print halshs-00308719, HAL.
    12. Dong, Chunjiao & Shao, Chunfu & Clarke, David B. & Nambisan, Shashi S., 2018. "An innovative approach for traffic crash estimation and prediction on accommodating unobserved heterogeneities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 407-428.
    13. Santiago Pereda-Fernández, 2021. "Copula-Based Random Effects Models for Clustered Data," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 575-588, March.
    14. Carlos Arias & Thomas Cox, 2001. "Estimation of a US dairy sector model by maximum simulated likelihood," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(9), pages 1201-1211.
    15. Philip Yu, 2000. "Bayesian analysis of order-statistics models for ranking data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 281-299, September.
    16. Bhat, Chandra R., 2003. "Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 837-855, November.
    17. Hajivassiliou, Vassilis, 2019. "Estimation and specification testing of panel data models with non-ignorable persistent heterogeneity, contemporaneous and intertemporal simultaneity and observable and unobservable dynamics," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102843, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Michael Scheidler & Reinhard Hujer & Joachim Grammig, 2005. "Discrete choice modelling in airline network management," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 467-486.
    19. Hie Joo Ahn & Bart Hobijn & Ayşegül Şahin, 2023. "The Dual U.S. Labor Market Uncovered," NBER Working Papers 31241, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Hayri Alper Arslan & Brantly Callaway & Tong Li, 2024. "Testing the effects of an unobservable factor: Do marriage prospects affect college major choice?," Papers 2410.19947, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:58:y:2009:i:3:p:405-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.