IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v71y2009i3p703-718.html

Deconvolution methods for non‐parametric inference in two‐level mixed models

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Hall
  • Tapabrata Maiti

Abstract

Summary. We develop a general non‐parametric approach to the analysis of clustered data via random effects. Assuming only that the link function is known, the regression functions and the distributions of both cluster means and observation errors are treated non‐parametrically. Our argument proceeds by viewing the observation error at the cluster mean level as though it were a measurement error in an errors‐in‐variables problem, and using a deconvolution argument to access the distribution of the cluster mean. A Fourier deconvolution approach could be used if the distribution of the error‐in‐variables were known. In practice it is unknown, of course, but it can be estimated from repeated measurements, and in this way deconvolution can be achieved in an approximate sense. This argument might be interpreted as implying that large numbers of replicates are necessary for each cluster mean distribution, but that is not so; we avoid this requirement by incorporating statistical smoothing over values of nearby explanatory variables. Empirical rules are developed for the choice of smoothing parameter. Numerical simulations, and an application to real data, demonstrate small sample performance for this package of methodology. We also develop theory establishing statistical consistency.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Hall & Tapabrata Maiti, 2009. "Deconvolution methods for non‐parametric inference in two‐level mixed models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 703-718, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:71:y:2009:i:3:p:703-718
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00705.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00705.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00705.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Hall & Tapabrata Maiti, 2008. "Non‐parametric inference for clustered binary and count data when only summary information is available," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 725-738, September.
    2. Li, Tong & Vuong, Quang, 1998. "Nonparametric Estimation of the Measurement Error Model Using Multiple Indicators," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 139-165, May.
    3. Wendimagegn Ghidey & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Paul Eilers, 2004. "Smooth Random Effects Distribution in a Linear Mixed Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 945-953, December.
    4. Huageng Tao & Mari Palta & Brian S. Yandell & Michael A. Newton, 1999. "An Estimation Method for the Semiparametric Mixed Effects Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 102-110, March.
    5. G. Jongbloed, 1998. "Exponential deconvolution: two asymptotically equivalent estimators," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 52(1), pages 6-17, March.
    6. D.A. Ioannides & D.P. Papanastassiou, 2001. "Estimating the Distribution Function of a Stationary Process Involving Measurement Errors," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 181-198, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Xiao-Feng & Ye, Deping, 2015. "Conditional density estimation in measurement error problems," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 38-50.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Hall & Tapabrata Maiti, 2008. "Non‐parametric inference for clustered binary and count data when only summary information is available," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 725-738, September.
    2. Rendao Ye & Tonghui Wang & Saowanit Sukparungsee & Arjun Gupta, 2015. "Tests in variance components models under skew-normal settings," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(7), pages 885-904, October.
    3. Zeinolabedin Najafi & Karim Zare & Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi & Soheil Shokri & Amir Mosavi, 2022. "Inference and Local Influence Assessment in a Multifactor Skew-Normal Linear Mixed Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Staudenmayer, John & Ruppert, David & Buonaccorsi, John P., 2008. "Density Estimation in the Presence of Heteroscedastic Measurement Error," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 726-736, June.
    5. Gwennaëlle Mabon, 2014. "Adaptive Estimation of Random-Effects Densities In Linear Mixed-Effects Model," Working Papers 2014-41, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    6. Ho, Remus K.W. & Hu, Inchi, 2008. "Flexible modelling of random effects in linear mixed models--A Bayesian approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1347-1361, January.
    7. Yao Luo & Peijun Sang & Ruli Xiao, 2024. "Order Statistics Approaches to Unobserved Heterogeneity in Auctions," Working Papers tecipa-776, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    8. Lamy, Laurent, 2012. "The econometrics of auctions with asymmetric anonymous bidders," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 113-132.
    9. Fabienne Comte & Adeline Samson, 2012. "Nonparametric estimation of random-effects densities in linear mixed-effects model," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 951-975, December.
    10. Peng Zhang & Peter X.-K. Song & Annie Qu & Tom Greene, 2008. "Efficient Estimation for Patient-Specific Rates of Disease Progression Using Nonnormal Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 29-38, March.
    11. Ye, Rendao & Wang, Tonghui & Gupta, Arjun K., 2014. "Distribution of matrix quadratic forms under skew-normal settings," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 229-239.
    12. Kirill S. Evdokimov & Andrei Zeleneev, 2023. "Simple Estimation of Semiparametric Models with Measurement Errors," Papers 2306.14311, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    13. Manuel Arellano & Stéphane Bonhomme, 2012. "Identifying Distributional Characteristics in Random Coefficients Panel Data Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 79(3), pages 987-1020.
    14. D.A. Ioannides & D.P. Papanastassiou, 2001. "Estimating the Distribution Function of a Stationary Process Involving Measurement Errors," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 181-198, May.
    15. Kato, Kengo & Sasaki, Yuya, 2018. "Uniform confidence bands in deconvolution with unknown error distribution," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 129-161.
    16. Xiaojun Song & Jichao Yuan, 2026. "Testing Heteroskedasticity Under Measurement Error," Papers 2605.20012, arXiv.org.
    17. Roy, Arkaprava & Sarkar, Abhra, 2023. "Bayesian semiparametric multivariate density deconvolution via stochastic rotation of replicates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Susan Athey & Philip A. Haile, 2002. "Identification of Standard Auction Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(6), pages 2107-2140, November.
    19. Luo, Yao & Xiao, Ruli, 2023. "Identification of auction models using order statistics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 236(1).
    20. Hu, Yingyao & McAdams, David & Shum, Matthew, 2013. "Identification of first-price auctions with non-separable unobserved heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 186-193.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:71:y:2009:i:3:p:703-718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.