IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v180y2017i2p455-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The poor and the poorest, 50 years on: evidence from British Household Expenditure Surveys of the 1950s and 1960s

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Gazeley
  • Hector Gutierrez Rufrancos
  • Andrew Newell
  • Kevin Reynolds
  • Rebecca Searle

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Gazeley & Hector Gutierrez Rufrancos & Andrew Newell & Kevin Reynolds & Rebecca Searle, 2017. "The poor and the poorest, 50 years on: evidence from British Household Expenditure Surveys of the 1950s and 1960s," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(2), pages 455-474, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:180:y:2017:i:2:p:455-474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssa.12202
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Johnson, 1994. "The employment and retirement of older men in England and Wales, 1881–1981," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 47(1), pages 106-128, February.
    2. Bruce D. Meyer & James X. Sullivan, 2012. "Identifying the Disadvantaged: Official Poverty, Consumption Poverty, and the New Supplemental Poverty Measure," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(3), pages 111-136, Summer.
    3. Alissa Goodman & Steven Webb, 1995. "The distribution of UK household expenditure, 1979-92," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 55-80, August.
    4. W. F. F. Kemsley, 1966. "Sampling Errors in the Family Expenditure Survey," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Peter Scott, 2008. "Did owner‐occupation lead to smaller families for interwar working‐class households?1," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 61(1), pages 99-124, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:sus:susedp:9316 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Ian Gazeley & Hector Gutierrez Rufrancos & Andrew Newell & Kevin Reynolds & Rebecca Searle, 2016. "The Poor and the Poorest, fifty years on: Evidence from British Household Expenditure Surveys of the 1950s and 1960s," Working Paper Series 9316, Department of Economics, University of Sussex.
    3. Ian Gazeley & Hector Gutierrez Rufrancos & Andrew Newell & Kevin Reynolds & Rebecca Searle, 2016. "The Poor and the Poorest, fifty years on: Evidence from British Household Expenditure Surveys of the 1950s and 1960s," Working Paper Series 09316, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    4. Kang, Ji Young & Park, Sojung & Ahn, Seoyeon, 2022. "The effect of social pension on consumption among older adults in Korea," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    5. Dean Jolliffe & Juan Margitic & Martin Ravallion & Laura Tiehen, 2024. "Food stamps and America's poorest," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(4), pages 1380-1409, August.
    6. Giulia Bettin & Claudia Pigini & Alberto Zazzaro, 2023. "Lifting You up or Dragging You Down? The Role of Financial Inclusion in Poverty Transitions Among Italian Households," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 69(3), pages 606-639, September.
    7. Filandri, Marianna & Pasqua, Silvia & Struffolino, Emanuela, 2020. "Being Working Poor or Feeling Working Poor? The Role of Work Intensity and Job Stability for Subjective Poverty," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 147(3), pages 781-803.
    8. François Maniquet & Dirk Neumann, 2021. "Well-Being, Poverty, and Labor Income Taxation: Theory and Application to Europe and the United States," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 276-310, May.
    9. Debra L. Brucker & Sophie Mitra & Navena Chaitoo & Joseph Mauro, 2015. "More Likely to Be Poor Whatever the Measure: Working-Age Persons with Disabilities in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(1), pages 273-296, March.
    10. Anita Rizvi & Madeleine Kearns & Michael Dignam & Alison Coates & Melissa K. Sharp & Olivia Magwood & Patrick R. Labelle & Nour Elmestekawy & Sydney Rossiter & Ali A. A. Al‐Zubaidi & Omar Dewidar & Le, 2024. "Effects of guaranteed basic income interventions on poverty‐related outcomes in high‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    11. Ingvild Almås & Timothy K.M. Beatty & Thomas F. Crossley, 2018. "Lost in Translation: What do Engel Curves Tell us about the Cost of Living?," CESifo Working Paper Series 6886, CESifo.
    12. Tess Penne & Irene Cussó Parcerisas & Lauri Mäkinen & Bérénice Storms & Tim Goedemé, 2016. "Can reference budgets be used as a poverty line?," ImPRovE Working Papers 16/05, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    13. John A Bishop & Jonathan Lee & Lester A Zeager, 2018. "Adjusting for family size in the supplemental poverty measure," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 553-556, May.
    14. Nicholas Crafts, 2022. "The 15‐Hour Week: Keynes's Prediction Revisited," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(356), pages 815-829, October.
    15. Giulia Bettin & Claudia Pigini & Alberto Zazzaro, 2020. "Financial inclusion and poverty transitions: an empirical analysis for Italy," Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers 164, Money and Finance Research group (Mo.Fi.R.) - Univ. Politecnica Marche - Dept. Economic and Social Sciences.
    16. Bruce D. Meyer & Nikolas Mittag, 2015. "Using Linked Survey and Administrative Data to Better Measure Income: Implications for Poverty, Program Effectiveness and Holes in the Safety Net," Upjohn Working Papers 15-242, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    17. Ariusni & Sri Ulfa Sentosa & Alpon Satrianto, 2019. "Factors that Affect Scavengers Behavior in Making Consumption Decisions in the City of Padang," European Journal of Studies in Management and Business, EUROKD, vol. 12, pages 28-40.
    18. Bruce D. Meyer & James X. Sullivan, 2017. "Consumption and Income Inequality in the U.S. Since the 1960s," NBER Working Papers 23655, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Burkhauser, Richard V. & Corinth, Kevin & Elwell, James & Larrimore, Jeff, 2019. "Evaluating the Success of President Johnson's War on Poverty: Revisiting the Historical Record Using a Full-Income Poverty Measure," IZA Discussion Papers 12855, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Anita Rizvi & Vivian Welch & Marcia Gibson & Patrick R. Labelle & Christina Pollard & George A. Wells & Elizabeth Kristjansson, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Effects of guaranteed basic income interventions on poverty‐related outcomes in high‐income countries: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), December.
    21. Olga Alonso-Villar & Coral del Río, 2024. "Poverty among same-sex couple families in the United States: Is there a premium for married couples?," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 22(2), pages 495-517, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:180:y:2017:i:2:p:455-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.