IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v60y2023i3p688-721.html

Coming Apart While Scaling Up – Adoption of Logics and the Fragmentation of Organizational Identity in Science‐Based Ventures

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Kalum Schou

Abstract

When trying to commercialize, science‐based ventures often face contradicting institutional logics. While stakeholders appreciate scientific ability, they also increasingly demand concessions to a commercial logic focusing on efficiency and profit. To satisfy stakeholders, science‐based ventures must adapt their organizational identity to include the commercial logic. The study investigates this challenge, relying on a 24‐month in‐depth study of a venture in the photonics industry. Based on the findings, I developed a process model that outlines how the logics shift from compatibility to incompatibility during the adoption process, thereby causing the organizational identity to fragment. The paper contributes to research streams on organizational identity processes, dynamics of institutional logics in organizations, and scaling of science‐based ventures.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Kalum Schou, 2023. "Coming Apart While Scaling Up – Adoption of Logics and the Fragmentation of Organizational Identity in Science‐Based Ventures," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 688-721, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:60:y:2023:i:3:p:688-721
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12908
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12908?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Einar Rasmussen & Simon Mosey & Mike Wright, 2011. "The Evolution of Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Longitudinal Study of University Spin‐Off Venture Emergence," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 1314-1345, September.
    2. Markus Perkmann & Maureen McKelvey & Nelson Phillips, 2019. "Protecting Scientists from Gordon Gekko: How Organizations Use Hybrid Spaces to Engage with Multiple Institutional Logics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 298-318, March.
    3. Joep P. Cornelissen & Ona Akemu & Jeroen G. F. Jonkman & Mirjam D. Werner, 2021. "Building Character: The Formation of a Hybrid Organizational Identity in a Social Enterprise," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1294-1330, July.
    4. Markus Perkmann & André Spicer, 2014. "How Emerging Organizations Take Form: The Role of Imprinting and Values in Organizational Bricolage," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1785-1806, December.
    5. Snihur, Yuliya & Clarysse, Bart, 2022. "Sowing the seeds of failure: Organizational identity dynamics in new venture pivoting," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(1).
    6. Riccardo Fini & Einar Rasmussen & Johan Wiklund & Mike Wright, 2019. "Theories from the Lab: How Research on Science Commercialization can Contribute to Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(5), pages 865-894, July.
    7. Tina C. Ambos & Julian Birkinshaw, 2010. "How Do New Ventures Evolve? An Inductive Study of Archetype Changes in Science-Based Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 1125-1140, December.
    8. Massimo Colombo & Philippe Mustar & Mike Wright, 2010. "Dynamics of Science-based entrepreneurship," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Katy Mason & Martin Friesl & Chris J. Ford, 2019. "Markets under the Microscope: Making Scientific Discoveries Valuable through Choreographed Contestations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(5), pages 966-999, July.
    10. Sauermann, Henry & Roach, Michael, 2014. "Not all scientists pay to be scientists: PhDs’ preferences for publishing in industrial employment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 32-47.
    11. Giulia Cappellaro & Paul Tracey & Royston Greenwood, 2020. "From Logic Acceptance to Logic Rejection: The Process of Destabilization in Hybrid Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 415-438, March.
    12. Joep P. Cornelissen & Onajomo Akemu & Jeroen G. F. Jonkman & Mirjam D. Werner, 2021. "Building Character: The Formation of a Hybrid Organizational Identity in a Social Enterprise," Business Digest 2021/02, Nazarbayev University, Graduate School of Business.
    13. El-Awad, Ziad & Brattström, Anna & Breugst, Nicola, 2022. "Bridging cognitive scripts in multidisciplinary academic spinoff teams: A process perspective on how academics learn to work with non-academic managers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bohan, Sarah & Tippmann, Esther & Levie, Jonathan & Igoe, Josephine & Bowers, Blake, 2024. "What is scaling?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    2. Tero Montonen, 2025. "Hybrid Identity Work Strategies of Academic Entrepreneurs: Connection Building and Difference Building," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 14(1), pages 29-41, April.
    3. Anita Mustikasari & Wakhid Slamet Ciptono, 2025. "The Microfoundations of Managing Adaptive Tension as Dynamic Capability in Innovation Management," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(3), pages 649-679, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuliia Kyrdoda & Marco Balzano & Donata Vianelli, 2025. "The formation of a sustainable organizational identity: Insights from Brazilian coffee producers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Raj K. Shankar & Einar Rasmussen & Marius T. Mathisen & Øystein Widding, 2023. "Overcoming Buyer-Seller Tensions in the Pre-Acquisition Process," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(5), pages 1731-1759, September.
    3. Davide Hahn & Tommaso Minola & Silvio Vismara & Daniel Agyare, 2024. "Do exploration and exploitation in university research drive early-stage equity financing of university spin-offs?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 627-653, August.
    4. Lien Denoo & Anneleen Van Boxstael & Andrea Belz, 2024. "Help, I need somebody! Business and technology advisors in emerging science-based ventures at American universities," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1567-1605, October.
    5. Merve Güngördü-Arıoğlu & Deniz Tunçalp, 2025. "Understanding the processes of organizational hybridization: a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 3471-3520, December.
    6. Seokwon Chang & Mugoan Jeong, 2021. "Does Leadership Matter in Performance of Social Enterprises in South Korea?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Laura Rocca & Monica Veneziani & Andrea Caccialanza & Claudio Teodori, 2026. "Benefit Corporations: The Moral Legitimacy That Requires More Rules," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 4376-4392, March.
    8. Fabien Martinez, 2023. "Exploring the syncretic dynamics involved in dyadic business–NGO partnerships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4068-4083, November.
    9. Michele Meoli & Silvio Vismara, 2016. "University support and the creation of technology and non-technology academic spin-offs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 345-362, August.
    10. Smirnova, Inna & Shannon, Austin & Teplitskiy, Misha, 2025. "The effect of trainee career intentions on mentor's interest in the trainee: Experimental evidence from academia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    11. Teresa Dieguez & Paula Loureiro & Sulaiman Isabel Ferreira & Mário Basto, 2024. "Transformative Forces: Social Entrepreneurship as Key Competency," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 10(1), pages 23-33, April.
    12. Xiaohua Li & Daozhou Yang & Wu Zhao, 2021. "Scholars’ Identity Transition and Its Impact on Spin-Offs’ R&D Input," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Anita Lovas & Edina Berlinger & Fanni Tóth, 2025. "Social Enterprise Under Moral Hazard: Who Gets State Subsidies and Active Financing?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 37(1), pages 55-78, February.
    14. El-Awad, Ziad & Brattström, Anna & Breugst, Nicola, 2022. "Bridging cognitive scripts in multidisciplinary academic spinoff teams: A process perspective on how academics learn to work with non-academic managers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    15. Marius Tuft Mathisen & Einar Rasmussen, 2019. "The development, growth, and performance of university spin-offs: a critical review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1891-1938, December.
    16. Miozzo, Marcela & DiVito, Lori, 2016. "Growing fast or slow?: Understanding the variety of paths and the speed of early growth of entrepreneurial science-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 964-986.
    17. Huegel, Matthias, 2024. "University scientists’ multiple goals achievement: Social capital and its impact on research performance and research commercialization," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Andrea Setti, 2020. "Linking science-based firms with performance factors: An integrative systematic review of literature," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(2), pages 09-42, March.
    19. Uwe Cantner & Philip Doerr & Maximilian Goethner & Matthias Huegel & Martin Kalthaus, 2024. "A procedural perspective on academic spin-off creation: the changing relative importance of the academic and the commercial sphere," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1555-1590, April.
    20. Thilo Pollmeier & Christian Fisch & Mirko Hirschmann, 2026. "From profit to purpose: a systematic literature review and future research directions on B Corp certification," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 841-884, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:60:y:2023:i:3:p:688-721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.