IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v58y2021i1p245-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Covid‐19 and Our Understanding of Risk, Emergencies, and Crises

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Rouleau
  • Markus Hällgren
  • Mark de Rond

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Rouleau & Markus Hällgren & Mark de Rond, 2021. "Covid‐19 and Our Understanding of Risk, Emergencies, and Crises," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 245-248, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:58:y:2021:i:1:p:245-248
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12649
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davide Nicolini, 2011. "Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 602-620, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wan Ri Ho & Omid Maghazei & Torbjørn H. Netland, 2022. "Understanding manufacturing repurposing: a multiple-case study of ad hoc healthcare product production during COVID-19," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1257-1269, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Palo, Teea & Åkesson, Maria & Löfberg, Nina, 2019. "Servitization as business model contestation: A practice approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 486-496.
    2. Anne Kokkonen & Pauli Alin, 2015. "Practice-based learning in construction projects: a literature review," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 513-530, July.
    3. Paolo Rossi & Matteo Crippa & Gianlorenzo Scaccabarozzi, 2021. "The Relationship between Practitioners and Caregivers during a Treatment of Palliative Care: A Grounded Theory of a Challenging Collaborative Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Matt Beane & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2015. "What Difference Does a Robot Make? The Material Enactment of Distributed Coordination," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1553-1573, December.
    5. Alexandra Michel, 2014. "The Mutual Constitution of Persons and Organizations: An Ontological Perspective on Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1082-1110, August.
    6. Aslam, Muhammad Shakeel & O’Reilly, Dermot & Shah, Uzair, 2023. "Taking the rough with the smooth: A qualitative inquiry into social and cultural practices of knowledge-sharing work in international consultancy alliances," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    7. Scott F. Turner & Violina Rindova, 2012. "A Balancing Act: How Organizations Pursue Consistency in Routine Functioning in the Face of Ongoing Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 24-46, February.
    8. Sietze Vellema & Greetje Schouten & Rob Van Tulder, 2020. "Partnering capacities for inclusive development in food provisioning," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(6), pages 710-727, November.
    9. Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel & Eldridge, Stephen & Wensley, Anthony K.P., 2014. "Counter-knowledge and realised absorptive capacity," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 165-176.
    10. Isabel Martinez Leal & Jayda Martinez & Maggie Britton & Tzuan A. Chen & Virmarie Correa-Fernández & Bryce Kyburz & Vijay Nitturi & Ezemenari M. Obasi & Kelli Drenner & Teresa Williams & Kathleen Case, 2022. "Collaborative Learning: A Qualitative Study Exploring Factors Contributing to a Successful Tobacco Cessation Train-the-Trainer Program as a Community of Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Galina Kallio, 2020. "A carrot isn’t a carrot isn’t a carrot: tracing value in alternative practices of food exchange," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1095-1109, December.
    12. Raelin, Joseph A., 2016. "Imagine there are no leaders: Reframing leadership as collaborative agency," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 131-158.
    13. James, Deborah Michelle & Pilnick, Alison & Hall, Alex & Collins, Luke, 2016. "Participants' use of enacted scenes in research interviews: A method for reflexive analysis in health and social care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 38-45.
    14. Manning, Stephan & Reinecke, Juliane, 2016. "A modular governance architecture in-the-making: How transnational standard-setters govern sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 618-633.
    15. Thinley Tharchen & Raghu Garud & Rebecca L. Henn, 2020. "Design as an interactive boundary object," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    16. Siedlok, Frank & Hibbert, Paul & Sillince, John, 2015. "From practice to collaborative community in interdisciplinary research contexts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 96-107.
    17. Leon, Ramona – Diana & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Raúl & Gómez-Gasquet, Pedro & Mula, Josefa, 2017. "Social network analysis: A tool for evaluating and predicting future knowledge flows from an insurance organization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 103-118.
    18. Liubertė Irina, 2018. "Theorising Practice and Developing Practically Relevant Insights in Organisational Research," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 79(1), pages 55-70, June.
    19. Caccamo, Marta & Pittino, Daniel & Tell, Fredrik, 2023. "Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    20. Viviana Gutiérrez Rincón & Manoj Chandra Bayon & Jose Javier Aguilar Zambrano & Javier Medina Vasquez, 2022. "Exploring the Configuration of Institutional Practices—A Case Study of Innovation Implementation in Healthcare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:58:y:2021:i:1:p:245-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.