IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v43y2006i8p1671-1702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Political Side of Board Involvement in Strategy: A Study of Mixed‐Ownership Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Ravasi
  • Alessandro Zattoni

Abstract

abstract This article reports on a comparative study of strategic decision‐making and board functioning in nine firms. Findings indicate that the heterogeneity of interests represented on the board, members' possession of relevant knowledge, and the presence of ex‐ante conflict resolution mechanisms combine in shaping if and how board members engage in strategy‐related activities and how strategic decisions are taken. Findings extend current understandings about the strategic functions of the board (monitoring, advice, and resource‐dependence), suggesting how, under certain conditions, boards may act as negotiation forums where directors search for a reconciliation between diverging shareholders' interests and views.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Ravasi & Alessandro Zattoni, 2006. "Exploring the Political Side of Board Involvement in Strategy: A Study of Mixed‐Ownership Institutions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 1671-1702, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:43:y:2006:i:8:p:1671-1702
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00659.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00659.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00659.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stiles, Philip & Taylor, Bernard, 2001. "Boards at Work: How Directors View their Roles and Responsibilities," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198288763, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Mai, 2017. "An examination of independent directors in Vietnam," OSF Preprints ay6dv, Center for Open Science.
    2. Boxer, Rosie & Berry, Aidan & Perren, Lew, 2012. "Differing perceptions of non-executive directors’ roles in UK SMEs: Governance conundrum or cultural anomaly?," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 38-50.
    3. Eythor Ivar Jonsson, 2005. "The Role Model of the Board: a preliminary study of the roles of Icelandic boards," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 710-717, September.
    4. Massicotte, Steeve & Henri, Jean-François, 2021. "The use of management accounting information by boards of directors to oversee strategy implementation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    5. Saim Kashmiri & Cameron Duncan Nicol & Liwu Hsu, 2017. "Birds of a feather: intra-industry spillover of the Target customer data breach and the shielding role of IT, marketing, and CSR," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 208-228, March.
    6. Reggy Hooghiemstra & Jaap Manen, 2004. "Non-executive directors in the Netherlands: another expectations gap?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 25-41.
    7. Fabio Zona & Alessandro Zattoni, 2007. "Beyond the Black Box of Demography: board processes and task effectiveness within Italian firms," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 852-864, September.
    8. Ahsan Habib & Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan & Mostafa Monzur Hasan, 2018. "Firm life cycle and advisory directors," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 575-592, November.
    9. Niamh Brennan, 2010. "A review of corporate governance research : an Irish perspective," Open Access publications 10197/2962, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    10. Laura F. Spira, 2003. "Audit Committees: begging the question?," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 180-188, July.
    11. Christopher Cowton, 2011. "Putting Creditors in Their Rightful Place: Corporate Governance and Business Ethics in the Light of Limited Liability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 21-32, March.
    12. Niamh Brennan, 2006. "Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: is there an expectations gap?," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(6), pages 577-593, November.
    13. Eugenio Zubeltzu-Jaka & Eduardo Ortas & Igor Álvarez-Etxeberria, 2019. "Independent Directors and Organizational Performance: New Evidence from A Meta-Analytic Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Bertrand Valiorgue & Xavier Hollandts, 2020. "La contribution des administrateurs à la fabrique de la gouvernance dans les coopératives agricoles, le cas Limagrain," Post-Print hal-03041029, HAL.
    15. Kevin Hendry & Geoffrey C. Kiel, 2004. "The Role of the Board in Firm Strategy: integrating agency and organisational control perspectives," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(4), pages 500-520, October.
    16. Irene Mostert & Dennis Veltrop & Paula van Veen-Dirks & Jakob de Haan, 2015. "How cognitive conflict and higher levels of board tenure shield boards from high-tenured executives: Evidence from Dutch financial institutions," DNB Working Papers 488, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    17. Richard Akisimire & Ernest Abaho & Maureen Tweyongyere, 2020. "CEO Duality and Financial Performance: Testing the Moderating Role of Firm Age: Evidence from a Developing Economy," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(3), pages 53-64.
    18. Mariateresa Torchia & Andrea Calabrò & Morten Huse, 2011. "Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 299-317, August.
    19. Karin Hakelius & Helena Hansson, 2016. "Measuring Changes in Farmers’ Attitudes to Agricultural Cooperatives: Evidence from Swedish Agriculture 1993–2013," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 531-546, November.
    20. Mitchell Bryce & Muhammad Jahangir Ali & Paul R. Mather, 2021. "Director expectations gap and hindsight bias," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 2965-2996, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:43:y:2006:i:8:p:1671-1702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.